Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > American
Republic Airline Unilateral JS Action >

Republic Airline Unilateral JS Action

Search

Notices

Republic Airline Unilateral JS Action

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 09-06-2019 | 10:15 PM
  #461  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2005
Posts: 3,707
Likes: 0
Default

Actually it's not a rah flight, it's an aa flight on rah equipment, rah gets priority to jumpseat then aa/wo then oal. Simple as that. Your problem is an I.T. issue with aa not the way aa/wo get jumpseat.
Fight it all you want, if aa caves in I will be surprised but they aa mgt likes to **** off employees in the first place so maybe you get it.
Old 09-06-2019 | 10:34 PM
  #462  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2016
Posts: 125
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by ICUROOK
Thanks, don't need it.
Pretty cocky to think a commuter airline with 80 planes operating a contract for a flag carrier is going to start a jumpseat war with the worlds largest airline over priority on the flag carrier’s own coded flights and not need a little luck. It is this exact attitude that is going to turn us against you and fight this. Most of us on here think what you are asking for is fair, but the few clowns on here trying to swing your **** like you have a dog in the fight is why you are getting the response from AA pilots you are currently getting. You truly think that the AA pilots and APA are just going to accept this? You think that AA, who owns 25% of Republic doesn’t have the pull with the board of directors at RAH to reverse this? I think you’ll need a little luck which is ok to admit. Hell, I’ll take a little luck any day of the week. Clearly you are blinded by your own arrogance here.

Last edited by jetflyer123; 09-06-2019 at 10:50 PM.
Old 09-06-2019 | 11:21 PM
  #463  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2018
Posts: 301
Likes: 0
From: Non-standard Phraseology Curator
Default

Just wondering...wasn't there supposed to be a response from APA/AA today? First time caller, long time listener...
Old 09-07-2019 | 04:48 AM
  #464  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Apr 2011
Posts: 729
Likes: 0
From: ERJ 170
Default

Originally Posted by jetflyer123
Pretty cocky to think a commuter airline with 80 planes operating a contract for a flag carrier is going to start a jumpseat war with the worlds largest airline over priority on the flag carrier’s own coded flights and not need a little luck. It is this exact attitude that is going to turn us against you and fight this. Most of us on here think what you are asking for is fair, but the few clowns on here trying to swing your **** like you have a dog in the fight is why you are getting the response from AA pilots you are currently getting. You truly think that the AA pilots and APA are just going to accept this? You think that AA, who owns 25% of Republic doesn’t have the pull with the board of directors at RAH to reverse this? I think you’ll need a little luck which is ok to admit. Hell, I’ll take a little luck any day of the week. Clearly you are blinded by your own arrogance here.
The only ones swinging their **** around, throwing temper tantrums, spreading false information, threatening denied JS and loss of travel benefits are AA pilots.

How exactly is this a JS war? Are you being denied a JS? No. You are getting reciprocal treatment.

Sent from my GM1917 using Tapatalk
Old 09-07-2019 | 05:33 AM
  #465  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2016
Posts: 1,826
Likes: 0
From: 6th place
Default

Now i know why airways stopped hiring republic guys back in 2013 lol.
Old 09-07-2019 | 06:36 AM
  #466  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2016
Posts: 125
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by mainlineAF
Now i know why airways stopped hiring republic guys back in 2013 lol.
That hasn’t changed much at AA. Granted, outside of being military or a flow you have almost no chance of getting hired here. It’s not actually the republic guys fault though. I’ve met a few great guys over there. Their problem is most of their guys are likely young and know nothing about the industry yet so they blindly follow the Teamsters and it’s merry band of window lickers who are trying to disrupt the status quo with an opponent 20+ times their size. Anyone who has half a brain knows this was driven by their union (why else would the union and not the company inform the gate agents of a change to FOM policy), and of course management “supports” the pilots on this. Why wouldn’t they? It is a no cost item to the company and shows support for the pilots which maintains balance and trust. Would/will they continue to support the pilot group if AA turns on pressure or if this began affecting the bottom line somehow, probably not.
Old 09-07-2019 | 06:46 AM
  #467  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Dec 2017
Posts: 58
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by jetflyer123
That hasn’t changed much at AA. Granted, outside of being military or a flow you have almost no chance of getting hired here. It’s not actually the republic guys fault though. I’ve met a few great guys over there. Their problem is most of their guys are likely young and know nothing about the industry yet so they blindly follow the Teamsters and it’s merry band of window lickers who are trying to disrupt the status quo with an opponent 20+ times their size. Anyone who has half a brain knows this was driven by their union (why else would the union and not the company inform the gate agents of a change to FOM policy), and of course management “supports” the pilots on this. Why wouldn’t they? It is a no cost item to the company and shows support for the pilots which maintains balance and trust. Would/will they continue to support the pilot group if AA turns on pressure or if this began affecting the bottom line somehow, probably not.

You mean the management team that withheld a contract for 8+ years? Republic Management hates their pilots. This was driven by both parties it seems. Teamsters are no different than ALPA same noodle different sauce. Local leadership determines more.
ALPA has done nothing but allow this industry to be ripped apart and stomped on. But yeah go ALPA....American rarely hires outside of their flow and Mil guys because they like have sheep as Pilots so they can continue to pass sub par contracts to their Pilot group.
Old 09-07-2019 | 07:03 AM
  #468  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Sep 2019
Posts: 78
Likes: 0
From: 737
Default

Originally Posted by jetflyer123
That hasn’t changed much at AA. Granted, outside of being military or a flow you have almost no chance of getting hired here. It’s not actually the republic guys fault though. I’ve met a few great guys over there. Their problem is most of their guys are likely young and know nothing about the industry yet so they blindly follow the Teamsters and it’s merry band of window lickers who are trying to disrupt the status quo with an opponent 20+ times their size. Anyone who has half a brain knows this was driven by their union (why else would the union and not the company inform the gate agents of a change to FOM policy), and of course management “supports” the pilots on this. Why wouldn’t they? It is a no cost item to the company and shows support for the pilots which maintains balance and trust. Would/will they continue to support the pilot group if AA turns on pressure or if this began affecting the bottom line somehow, probably not.
This is exactly what has emboldened them to take this action. Very few of their pilots will get an interview with AA so if that number moves to zero, what do they care? The few sitting tall in the left seat of their 175 are staying at RAH. They will hide behind their quality of life and FOM (don’t forget it was signed off by the FAA) and the word “reciprocal”.

But here’s the deal. Republic is Fee For Departure (FFD) and the price paid for that departure has been negotiated with the mainline carrier. If the flight leaves one minute late (just 1, go ask your Pilot on duty) the fee paid for the flight declines significantly. So yes a late departure hurts AA’s stats but it also hurts the Republic bottom line.

So let’s all keep kicking our own a**es.
Old 09-07-2019 | 07:04 AM
  #469  
chrisreedrules's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2012
Posts: 4,601
Likes: 0
From: CRJ FO
Default

Originally Posted by busdriver123456
You mean the management team that withheld a contract for 8+ years? Republic Management hates their pilots. This was driven by both parties it seems. Teamsters are no different than ALPA same noodle different sauce. Local leadership determines more.
ALPA has done nothing but allow this industry to be ripped apart and stomped on. But yeah go ALPA....American rarely hires outside of their flow and Mil guys because they like have sheep as Pilots so they can continue to pass sub par contracts to their Pilot group.
Obvious attempt to troll is obvious.
Old 09-07-2019 | 07:12 AM
  #470  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2016
Posts: 125
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by magnus0322
The only ones swinging their **** around, throwing temper tantrums, spreading false information, threatening denied JS and loss of travel benefits are AA pilots.

How exactly is this a JS war? Are you being denied a JS? No. You are getting reciprocal treatment.

Sent from my GM1917 using Tapatalk
A “reciprocal agreement” on OUR FLIGHTS. I fully support that your captains have the right to deny the jumpseat, which is what they will be doing to AA pilots who are properly listed for the jumpseat in accordance with company policy. You want to deny the jumpseat out of order than fine! That’s a jumpseat war.

FAR 121.547 says that in order to sit in the jumpseat you must have permission from the pilot in command and that under his emergency authority the PIC can exclude anyone from the cockpit in the interest of safety. NO ONE HERE IS ARGUING THAT WHATSOEVER.

What we are arguing is the fact that a handful of your brightest crayon munchers are stating that this is not a change to priority and is a true reciprocal agreement. A reciprocal agreement means I can ride your jumpseat and you can ride mine, ok that box is checked.

Now that we have those two items out of the way, the next issue in the reciprocity agreement would be how we are cleared from the standby list in accordance with the flag carriers travel/jumpseat policy. Mine says pilots on their own metal, D1 FDJ, D2 FDJ, D6UJ. Yours says..... oh wait that’s right you didn’t sell a single ticket, your RJ says American Eagle on the side of it, you were hired to operate the way we tell you to operate, you use our gate agents, and the standby list, including jumpseats, for AA flights is cleared in accordance with AA policy. By all means, tell us we can’t ride, that is 100% your right, but when we’ve done everything right in accordance with the policy that trumps yours and you remove us for the Delta guy, it’s a jumpseat war. Trying to hide behind the fact that your FOM states this is “the law” is retarded. The FAA doesn’t care about what the priority list for a jumpseat is beyond FAA, NTSB, Secret Service etc, and I doubt AA is going to let a little contract carrier put pressure on them just because they changed their FOM. That is setting a dangerous precedent, and I doubt they would take that risk. While this is small, what would be next?

All that being said, I still think you guys are right, and if it wasn’t for a few of your finest on here pounding their chests because “we’ve successfully changed the jumpseat priority and are going to treat AA pilots the way they treated us all these years,” there would probably be a lot of guys that would go to bat for you. Like we’ve said, we had no idea, but the way these guys have been on here I’d rather just throw them a comfort animal and send them off to their safe space. They can sit there and feel great about themselves for bumping the American guy off an American flight and giving it to United. Bravo
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Sr. Barco
Republic Airways
194
09-17-2015 11:35 AM
DoNotReset
Republic Airways
35
03-11-2013 05:50 PM
Hal9000
Major
38
05-18-2011 01:29 PM
Frisky Pilot
Major
0
06-23-2005 02:46 PM
Gordon C
Regional
0
04-21-2005 06:14 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices