![]() |
I tried to give them the benefit of the doubt too until I looked into it more and ran different scenarios. As someone in the 2500 saying this, we would have been better off with nothing.
|
Originally Posted by ny797
(Post 3105685)
I tried to give them the benefit of the doubt too until I looked into it more and ran different scenarios. As someone in the 2500 saying this, we would have been better off with nothing.
|
Originally Posted by EasternShore
(Post 3105221)
The very junior individuals that bid ZTL’s can thank the senior guys that get furloughed since we’re now abrogating seniority.
No senior pilot will be furloughed without having the opportunity to bid a ZTL or a conditional ZTL. A senior pilot, below the cutline, who passes on both the ZTL or conditional ZTL will be at risk of furlough. |
As I look at this, the ZTL part of the LOA is not designed for the bottom 2500, it is designed or the top 5000, to save the bottom 2500. What do I mean? What do senior captains that max their pay/QOL do? Bid a line, drop, (through trades) all their lines (zero time), and then pick up tips to max their desired end state. They want a zero time line so they just pick and chose what they want rom open time, trades, premium, etc. Get the greedy CAs to jump on this any pretty soon you have a sizable hunk of mitigated furloughs.
The ALternat month schedule is or those that want some time off, have dual incomes with kids at home, want to get a lot of time of when combined with vacation or are too junior to normally get December off, but now will. Another sizable chunk of furloughs mitigated. Furlough with training, those at the top o the bottom 2500. They don’t believe that they will be out very long, probably 190/75/76/330 pilots that can make some money from the company while furloughed. The rest of us in the bottom half of the 2500 can hope for conditional ZTL or AML to not have to pay COBRA. The bottom 1000 just have to wait and pray. Sent from my iPad using Tapatalk |
After speaking directly with my rep, I will say this much:
They are aware of the same issues you all are posting here. The BOD is concerned about the risk of management failing to provide transparency regarding the "target" furlough number. They are discussing ways to ensure that the they don't move the goalposts in a manner many posters here are concerned about. I am not sure the method they will try to use (or share on a public forum their options up for consideration), but suffice it to say, they want to make sure that your fears are addressed. |
Originally Posted by RhinoBallAuto
(Post 3105695)
After speaking directly with my rep, I will say this much:
They are aware of the same issues you all are posting here. The BOD is concerned about the risk of management failing to provide transparency regarding the "target" furlough number. They are discussing ways to ensure that the they don't move the goalposts in a manner many posters here are concerned about. I am not sure the method they will try to use (or share on a public forum their options up for consideration), but suffice it to say, they want to make sure that your fears are addressed. |
Originally Posted by RhinoBallAuto
(Post 3105695)
. The BOD is concerned about the risk of management failing to provide transparency regarding the "target" furlough number. They are discussing ways to ensure that the they don't move the goalposts in a manner many posters here are concerned about.
|
Originally Posted by AAL24
(Post 3105738)
Discussing ways to ensure this after they signed the LOA!WTF? Maybe they should have created some iron clad language before they signed the deal. Can we fire this NC and get the old one back?
|
Take a deep breath. Open a cold one and watch the zoom meeting when it's posted.
Then if you still have questions, email your reps for more information. APA has a bit of useful leverage in this matter. I trust the process, and I have more skin in the game than most. |
Originally Posted by RhinoBallAuto
(Post 3105766)
Take a deep breath. Open a cold one and watch the zoom meeting when it's posted.
Then if you still have questions, email your reps for more information. APA has a bit of useful leverage in this matter. I trust the process, and I have more skin in the game than most. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 10:24 AM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands