![]() |
Originally Posted by m78fl370
(Post 3105173)
This is going to lead to WAY more guys without pay this fall than would have been if the company just had to furlough the old fashioned way.
How so? A max of 2500 can be furloughed unless more warn letters are issued and the ZTL is supposed to reduce furloughs 1 for 1. Or are you seeing it another way? Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
I think the biggest question is if this is one for one, then what number of furloughed are we starting at? Without this info we are left blindly trusting the company on this most important issue.
|
Originally Posted by airlinegypsy
(Post 3105306)
How so? A max of 2500 can be furloughed unless more warn letters are issued and the ZTL is supposed to reduce furloughs 1 for 1. Or are you seeing it another way?
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk From what it looks like to me, for the bottom 1600, this deal could work out for them better than nothing. For the 900 in the bubble, this looks like a certain furlough, or ZTL, when there was a chance of hanging on before. |
Originally Posted by m78fl370
(Post 3105371)
The issue was that the 1600 staffing overage was still understood to be the number for next summer. The overage was bigger for the fall, 2500? But it looked like they were going to have to carry some of that overage due to being unable to furlough that many and then get them back by next summer. We just conceded to the company the ability to quickly put all 2500 without pay throughout the fall, and bring them back quickly. (Maybe).
From what it looks like to me, for the bottom 1600, this deal could work out for them better than nothing. For the 900 in the bubble, this looks like a certain furlough, or ZTL, when there was a chance of hanging on before. |
Originally Posted by m78fl370
(Post 3105371)
The issue was that the 1600 staffing overage was still understood to be the number for next summer. The overage was bigger for the fall, 2500? But it looked like they were going to have to carry some of that overage due to being unable to furlough that many and then get them back by next summer. We just conceded to the company the ability to quickly put all 2500 without pay throughout the fall, and bring them back quickly. (Maybe).
From what it looks like to me, for the bottom 1600, this deal could work out for them better than nothing. For the 900 in the bubble, this looks like a certain furlough, or ZTL, when there was a chance of hanging on before. Yes... but can’t those in the 900 preference for a ZTL in event of furlough? If they weren’t going to be furloughed then they won’t get a ZTL. Still making guarantee. That’s how I understand it anyways. Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
Originally Posted by airlinegypsy
(Post 3105429)
Yes... but can’t those in the 900 preference for a ZTL in event of furlough? If they weren’t going to be furloughed then they won’t get a ZTL. Still making guarantee. That’s how I understand it anyways.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk |
Originally Posted by LBFO79
(Post 3105442)
You are correct, but what others are trying to say is that these LOAs are going to trigger a higher number of furloughs than without the LOAs. So if 1600(a guess) was the number AA was going to furlough before these LOAs, that could go up significantly due to the fact that is now not as costly to the company to furlough pilots. Furthermore they can keep those furloughed pilots out even longer. I’d say by the looks of it that the top part of that 2500 are getting put more at risk of furlough because of this LOA. We just removed a barrier to furloughing pilots.
|
Originally Posted by LBFO79
(Post 3105442)
You are correct, but what others are trying to say is that these LOAs are going to trigger a higher number of furloughs than without the LOAs. So if 1600(a guess) was the number AA was going to furlough before these LOAs, that could go up significantly due to the fact that is now not as costly to the company to furlough pilots. Furthermore they can keep those furloughed pilots out even longer. I’d say by the looks of it that the top part of that 2500 are getting put more at risk of furlough because of this LOA. We just removed a barrier to furloughing pilots.
|
APA didn’t even need to be in the room for this loa. This is a company’s wet dream come true. All the cost associated with furloughing a pilot just vanished. They’ll side line the whole 2500 for the winter with zero pay yet staying qualified. What a f@cking joking. And is there anything in these loas that require a portion of the 2500 to be awarded the alternating month schedule? Why not just offer that to the whole pilot group, maybe get some takers at the top end and save more money. Then award ZTLs to the 2500. They removed the one and only deterrent the company had to furloughing in mass, training cost.
I’ll take the involuntary furlough and state unemployment thanks. I’ll be damned if I stay current and go through training for zero $. They can bring me back through the full course when they need me. |
As I read it the ZTL won’t start until after you’re VSTLOA is complete, correct??
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:02 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands