View Poll Results: Will AA declare bankruptcy?
Yes



219
70.65%
No



91
29.35%
Voters: 310. You may not vote on this poll
Bankruptcy
#751
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Dec 2019
Posts: 2,262
Likes: 119
The only way I see the regionals surviving is them making mainline(ish) wages while they wait to flow. That might stem the outflow to other airlines and not disrupt applicants to AA from mil, 135, etc. dramatically increase the flow and the higher pay will make it the go to place for young cfi’s
#752
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Oct 2018
Posts: 564
Likes: 0
The only way I see the regionals surviving is them making mainline(ish) wages while they wait to flow. That might stem the outflow to other airlines and not disrupt applicants to AA from mil, 135, etc. dramatically increase the flow and the higher pay will make it the go to place for young cfi’s
#753
On Reserve
Joined: Apr 2019
Posts: 150
Likes: 0
I think it would be interested if they were offered pay longevity. Not seniority. Like 8 years at envoy, start at year 8 pay once you flow. Or maybe a scale, every 2 years equals 1 year of pay longevity at AA. I know if I was 1 year from flowing knowing I would be eyeing up year 3-5 pay when I started I would be way more hesitant to leave.
#754
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jul 2021
Posts: 305
Likes: 0
here is a idea
what if everyone that is at Envoy, Piedmont, PSA that is with in one year of flowing to AA is given a AA seniority number, but they stay at the regional until flow date. You could throw in retaining pay seniority when you flow as well (better than retention bonus) You then would never have a problem staffing a wholly owned regional. It’s free for AA and they can merge each wholly owned by hire date and last four of social when they give out the seniority numbers. just a thought.
what if everyone that is at Envoy, Piedmont, PSA that is with in one year of flowing to AA is given a AA seniority number, but they stay at the regional until flow date. You could throw in retaining pay seniority when you flow as well (better than retention bonus) You then would never have a problem staffing a wholly owned regional. It’s free for AA and they can merge each wholly owned by hire date and last four of social when they give out the seniority numbers. just a thought.
#755
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jul 2021
Posts: 305
Likes: 0
I think it would be interested if they were offered pay longevity. Not seniority. Like 8 years at envoy, start at year 8 pay once you flow. Or maybe a scale, every 2 years equals 1 year of pay longevity at AA. I know if I was 1 year from flowing knowing I would be eyeing up year 3-5 pay when I started I would be way more hesitant to leave.
#756
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Nov 2016
Posts: 147
Likes: 0
Originally Posted by NotPhlying;[url=tel:3324398
3324398[/url]]Why? Pilots will always leave the WO for other opportunities. How about the regionals improve theIr contracts and address QOL issues. Your seniority idea royal screws the OTS new hires.
#757
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jul 2021
Posts: 305
Likes: 0
the whole own pilots who actually work for AAG get screwed when 2,000 pilots get hired in a year while they wait for their flow date. AA most likely won’t go hire 1,500 out of their wholly own carriers next year. so either way someone is getting screwed the only difference is a wholly own pilot has put in blood, sweat and tears to help AAG succeed for years while the OTS hire has done absolutely nothing for AAG. Regional wholly owned pilots won’t stick around if they lose thousands of numbers in seniority because they work for a wholly owed carrier. Airline pilots know seniority is everything. If you stapled all regional pilots to the bottom of the seniority list, then the OTS hires would really be getting screwed. This is a way to help those that have paid their dues and keep them at AA for 30 plus years for free.
#758
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Nov 2016
Posts: 147
Likes: 0
[QUOTE=NotPhlying;[url=tel:3324403]3324403[/url]]So what you’re saying is Skywest, Mesa, nor Republic contribute to AAG? Hmm.. interesting outlook. Here’s the deal..your union signed the dotted line for whatever flow agreement you have. Now you’re upset that you can’t get an interview outside of flow? Have you even applied to AA? Do you meet the requirements? We have new hire pilots from ALL 3 WOs who were hired outside or flow. You can always stay at your regional and keep your seniority.[/QUOTE
I never said I was upset. Trust me i’ll be at AA sooner than later. i’m just giving an idea to help retain pilots instead of other legacy carriers bleeding them dry. i never said giving every single pilot at a wholly owned a seniority number, just those 1 year out from flow. if you get hired tomorrow you have nothing to worry about.
Just take a breath i’m sure you’ll get a interview.
I never said I was upset. Trust me i’ll be at AA sooner than later. i’m just giving an idea to help retain pilots instead of other legacy carriers bleeding them dry. i never said giving every single pilot at a wholly owned a seniority number, just those 1 year out from flow. if you get hired tomorrow you have nothing to worry about.
Just take a breath i’m sure you’ll get a interview.
#759
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 2,610
Likes: 15
The problem with any of the seniority / longevity ideas is that both of those concepts are defined in the APA JCBA, and offering those benefits to pilots not yet on property would take negotiation with APA, which by some accounts the company doesn't seem willing to do. Given that there was already some negative comments by the APA President about WO pilots being paid their large bonuses while being in AA new hire classes (the last, large amount is supposed to come on their last WO paycheck, which at PSA could come well after leaving the company), I would imagine the APA would try and extract as much negotiating leverage as they could out of it (as well they should), and AAG doesn't seem willing to give much up at the moment.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



