View Poll Results: Will AA declare bankruptcy?
Yes



219
70.65%
No



91
29.35%
Voters: 310. You may not vote on this poll
Bankruptcy
#721
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Dec 2019
Posts: 2,262
Likes: 119
Again, why would we vote for a lower rate for anything right now if we have all the leverage? I could see, maybe, a new category being created that is current book group 1 pay, with everything else getting boosted, in an entirely new contract, not an LOA.
if you onboard a bunch of RJ guys at once and keep them at subpar mainline wages for a few years with fences they will still be bailing left and right and the company will have solved nothing
if you onboard a bunch of RJ guys at once and keep them at subpar mainline wages for a few years with fences they will still be bailing left and right and the company will have solved nothing
#722
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 2,610
Likes: 15
Again, why would we vote for a lower rate for anything right now if we have all the leverage? I could see, maybe, a new category being created that is current book group 1 pay, with everything else getting boosted, in an entirely new contract, not an LOA.
if you onboard a bunch of RJ guys at once and keep them at subpar mainline wages for a few years with fences they will still be bailing left and right and the company will have solved nothing
if you onboard a bunch of RJ guys at once and keep them at subpar mainline wages for a few years with fences they will still be bailing left and right and the company will have solved nothing
Disagree. The key is one legacy putting 50-76 seats on a mainline list. As an aside, my guess is that will be DAL, whom I believe already have a CRJ900 rate in their contract (they still do pay rates per type).
Beyond that, I think you see the other two legacies (UAL, AA, and maybe Alaska) panic and then do the same thing.
Wild cards in that process would be a SKW OR RAH acquisition by any of the legacies and then detangling all the aircraft operated for other carriers. That could be a catalyst.
At the end of the day I think the goal is to get all those aircraft on one seniority list, then the competition for pilots via pay rates that we’ve seen over the last 5 years continues.
Don’t let perfect be the enemy of the good.
Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
#723
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Feb 2021
Posts: 414
Likes: 0
Delta is already putting regional jets on their list. They are the 220's. The more 220s they add, the fewer 50-76 seat regional jets they need.
They can cut service to a "regional" city from 7 RJ flights down to 4-5 220 flights, move more passengers, fewer pilots needed, and on the mainline certificate.
A slower, gradual replacement.
They can cut service to a "regional" city from 7 RJ flights down to 4-5 220 flights, move more passengers, fewer pilots needed, and on the mainline certificate.
A slower, gradual replacement.
#724
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 2,610
Likes: 15
Delta is already putting regional jets on their list. They are the 220's. The more 220s they add, the fewer 50-76 seat regional jets they need.
They can cut service to a "regional" city from 7 RJ flights down to 4-5 220 flights, move more passengers, fewer pilots needed, and on the mainline certificate.
A slower, gradual replacement.
They can cut service to a "regional" city from 7 RJ flights down to 4-5 220 flights, move more passengers, fewer pilots needed, and on the mainline certificate.
A slower, gradual replacement.
But if they want to operate 76 seat aircraft, I'm of the position that outsourced carriers aren't going to be able to staff appropriately sooner rather than later.
#725
You're not wrong; if you used to work where I worked there are quite a few places where we parked our band new CRJ900s right next to 717s (haven't seen a 220 yet).
But if they want to operate 76 seat aircraft, I'm of the position that outsourced carriers aren't going to be able to staff appropriately sooner rather than later.
But if they want to operate 76 seat aircraft, I'm of the position that outsourced carriers aren't going to be able to staff appropriately sooner rather than later.
Now that the regionals have to offer big bonuses and higher pay to get butts in the seats, that gap keeps decreasing and it makes sense to mainlines to protect their brand by bringing that flying in house. It's really that simple. Look for this trend to continue. Soon, SkyWest and Republic will be the only RJ operators (E175), and they will do the scraps mainlines cant do with 717s/220s/737s/319/320s. CRJs and E145s will be gone. There isn't anyone left to fly them.
#726
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 2,610
Likes: 15
RJs allow mainline carriers to provide the same level of frequency in smaller markets that they do in larger ones, probably more of an issue for Business travelers than leisure, but there's also a leisure crowd that appreciates having 1 hour layovers in hubs vs 3.
That, and that allows for a certain level of rebooking and flexibility when IROPs and mx issues hit. In certain parts of the areas of the country PSA serves, the moment there's a delay or weather issue there's 2-3 other hubs in play that passengers can be re-routed through. I was in one of our larger outstations a while back when a LCC had to do a return to field for a mx issue. The outcome for passengers? A no questions asked refund and "Have a nice day," because the next flight wasn't for two days and was already full with whatever bargain basement fares they were advertising.
Whatever value Vasu and his minions apply to that is up to them, but there's a certain level of flexibility and resiliency that RJs contribute to that isn't solely seen in the bottom line.
Now that the regionals have to offer big bonuses and higher pay to get butts in the seats, that gap keeps decreasing and it makes sense to mainlines to protect their brand by bringing that flying in house. It's really that simple. Look for this trend to continue. Soon, SkyWest and Republic will be the only RJ operators (E175), and they will do the scraps mainlines cant do with 717s/220s/737s/319/320s. CRJs and E145s will be gone. There isn't anyone left to fly them.
As I type this, money really isn't the issue, or the retention bonus AAG offered the regionals would've had a much higher uptake. It's all about the longer term benefits that accruing seniority on a mainline list ultimately provide, and pilots are keen not to miss out on.
#727
Banned
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 2,012
Likes: 0
long term with the ability to plan ahead? Yes
but 1/3 of the big 3 have those planes and 0/3 have lots of spare capacity.
so short term (short defined as time needed to manufacture several hundred 220’s) they need the 76 seat jets. And the sooner they get the jets and the pilots tacked down the better
#728
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 2,610
Likes: 15
long term with the ability to plan ahead? Yes
but 1/3 of the big 3 have those planes and 0/3 have lots of spare capacity.
so short term (short defined as time needed to manufacture several hundred 220’s) they need the 76 seat jets. And the sooner they get the jets and the pilots tacked down the better
but 1/3 of the big 3 have those planes and 0/3 have lots of spare capacity.
so short term (short defined as time needed to manufacture several hundred 220’s) they need the 76 seat jets. And the sooner they get the jets and the pilots tacked down the better
#729
Again, why would we vote for a lower rate for anything right now if we have all the leverage? I could see, maybe, a new category being created that is current book group 1 pay, with everything else getting boosted, in an entirely new contract, not an LOA.
if you onboard a bunch of RJ guys at once and keep them at subpar mainline wages for a few years with fences they will still be bailing left and right and the company will have solved nothing
if you onboard a bunch of RJ guys at once and keep them at subpar mainline wages for a few years with fences they will still be bailing left and right and the company will have solved nothing
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post



