Search
Notices
View Poll Results: Will AA declare bankruptcy?
Yes
219
70.65%
No
91
29.35%
Voters: 310. You may not vote on this poll

Bankruptcy

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-03-2021, 07:24 AM
  #701  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Cujo665's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2014
Position: Semi-Retired...
Posts: 3,132
Default

Originally Posted by thrust View Post
The A223 is already Group 2. A221 is 1.

AA has lots of pilots under 30 years old. So… 35+ year fences?
You're not reading it right. A new group 2 would be E190/195 & A221. Everything moves up 1 number to make space at the bottom for the RJ's

Why would an existing AA guy care if there is a fence that he can't bid down to an RJ? That same fence keeps a super senior RJ guy from displacing him.

For example, the fence could go away when the first guy hired at the RJ level after date of signing is able to bid a group 3 or higher aircraft. That would take several years, and most of the super senior RJ guys would be retired. Plenty of ways of deciding when fences fall.

Pointless to get bogged down in minutiae unless/until they decide to actually work in it again.
Cujo665 is offline  
Old 11-03-2021, 10:58 AM
  #702  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Dec 2019
Posts: 1,870
Default

Again why are we creating a new group for RJs? Just put them in group 1.

The biggest barrier to bringing RJs on property is the scope clauses for other work groups. Now a lot of stations will be required to be staffed by mainline. Mainline dispatch. Mainline FAs. Mainline mechanics. A few bucks an hour difference for the pilots is comically inconsequential to management.
AllYourBaseAreB is offline  
Old 11-03-2021, 11:11 AM
  #703  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Posts: 2,487
Default

Originally Posted by AllYourBaseAreB View Post
Again why are we creating a new group for RJs? Just put them in group 1.

The biggest barrier to bringing RJs on property is the scope clauses for other work groups. Now a lot of stations will be required to be staffed by mainline. Mainline dispatch. Mainline FAs. Mainline mechanics. A few bucks an hour difference for the pilots is comically inconsequential to management.

Or just make a Group Zero.

And I suspect you’re not wrong about the ancillary costs, but what we’re seeing is fundamentally about the idea that money is not the motivator for pilots, Seniority is, in particular Seniority on a list they see being on the rest of their career.

In the end, if they want to keep meat in the seats in the pointy end, they (management) has to figure out how to meet that demand.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
TallFlyer is offline  
Old 11-03-2021, 12:05 PM
  #704  
Banned
 
Joined APC: May 2017
Posts: 2,012
Default

Originally Posted by AllYourBaseAreB View Post
Again why are we creating a new group for RJs? Just put them in group.
it would preserve a separate fenced category for the pilots who brought the planes
ZeroTT is offline  
Old 11-03-2021, 12:19 PM
  #705  
Perennial Reserve
 
Excargodog's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2018
Posts: 11,526
Default

Originally Posted by TallFlyer View Post
Or just make a Group Zero.

And I suspect you’re not wrong about the ancillary costs, but what we’re seeing is fundamentally about the idea that money is not the motivator for pilots, Seniority is, in particular Seniority on a list they see being on the rest of their career.

In the end, if they want to keep meat in the seats in the pointy end, they (management) has to figure out how to meet that demand.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
Are you referring to the WO regionals as ‘the pointy end’? If so, I think you misunderstand why WOs exist. They exist to provide CHEAPER feed for AAG, not to provide PILOTS for mainline. As long as it is economically advantageous to AAG, there will be WOs, but the issue really isn’t between EITHER operating a WO or having NO regional feed for mainline. There will be WOs as long as it is more advantageous than subcontracting out the feed to Republic, Skywest, and Mesa.

Mainline has no shortage of acceptable applicants from other sources - including Republic, Skywest, and Mesa, the military, the ULCCs, the 135 world, etc.

We are talking management here. The only loyalty is to the bottom line.
Excargodog is offline  
Old 11-03-2021, 02:14 PM
  #706  
Gets Weekends Off
 
biigD's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2010
Posts: 1,729
Default

Originally Posted by Excargodog View Post
We are talking management here. The only loyalty is to the bottom line.
Awww dammit, are we in agreement here???
biigD is offline  
Old 11-03-2021, 03:19 PM
  #707  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2007
Posts: 2,487
Default

Originally Posted by Excargodog View Post
Are you referring to the WO regionals as ‘the pointy end’? If so, I think you misunderstand why WOs exist. They exist to provide CHEAPER feed for AAG, not to provide PILOTS for mainline. As long as it is economically advantageous to AAG, there will be WOs, but the issue really isn’t between EITHER operating a WO or having NO regional feed for mainline. There will be WOs as long as it is more advantageous than subcontracting out the feed to Republic, Skywest, and Mesa.

Mainline has no shortage of acceptable applicants from other sources - including Republic, Skywest, and Mesa, the military, the ULCCs, the 135 world, etc.

We are talking management here. The only loyalty is to the bottom line.

No, I’m referring to the pointy end of regional aircraft. And while I agree they are there to provide cheaper feed, that only exists if there are pilots to move the metal.

My suspicion is that we’re going to start seeing LCCs start to pull directly from Universities and then it’s really gonna get crazy for filling seats at regional airlines.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
TallFlyer is offline  
Old 11-03-2021, 03:27 PM
  #708  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2019
Posts: 314
Default

Originally Posted by TallFlyer View Post
No, I’m referring to the pointy end of regional aircraft. And while I agree they are there to provide cheaper feed, that only exists if there are pilots to move the metal.

My suspicion is that we’re going to start seeing LCCs start to pull directly from Universities and then it’s really gonna get crazy for filling seats at regional airlines.


Sent from my iPhone using Tapatalk
I had a spirit sim instructor on the JS a few weeks ago. He said spirit had a decent amount of people leaving for legacies/cargo and that he wouldn't be surprised if they had 1500 hour pilots in the right seat soon enough.
BurnerAccount69 is offline  
Old 11-03-2021, 05:17 PM
  #709  
Perennial Reserve
 
Excargodog's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jan 2018
Posts: 11,526
Default

Originally Posted by TallFlyer View Post
No, I’m referring to the pointy end of regional aircraft. And while I agree they are there to provide cheaper feed, that only exists if there are pilots to move the metal.
Agree totally, but just pointing out that there are other sources for that. It does not require a wholly owned. Not if subcontracting to other regionals remains viable. They can get feed from many other regionals and likely WILL if that’s cheaper than doing it in house.


My suspicion is that we’re going to start seeing LCCs start to pull directly from Universities and then it’s really gonna get crazy for filling seats at regional airlines.
Very possibly. But there will be no trouble filling seats at mainline - including from the right seats of the LCCs - unless bankruptcy or a concession are contract occurs. AA simply does not need the WOs as a pilot source. Not now, and not likely any time soon. Barring a collapse of all other regional flying they will have more than adequate qualified applications coming into HR.
Excargodog is offline  
Old 11-03-2021, 05:59 PM
  #710  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Nov 2018
Position: 135 F/O
Posts: 60
Default

Originally Posted by reandld View Post
Can't really see Piedmont closing up operations with their 145s. AA needs that lift and Piedmont is ready and willing to deliver it.
the hemorrhoid of apc strikes
QuebOLimaJet is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
aa73
American
200
10-09-2022 08:10 AM
tuktukdriver
Major
42
11-16-2013 08:29 AM
EmbraerFlyer
Major
1
10-08-2008 10:35 AM
redbaron84
Major
1
12-25-2005 09:49 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices