Originally Posted by pilot2804
(Post 3298597)
did you email pilot recruitment and ask? Sounds like they graded them
|
Mine has been green up until last night until seeing a big fat red X. I’ve emailed both recruiting and IT. We shall see!
|
Apparently 2,000 new hires next year. Don’t think that’s possible but it’s what I’m hearing.
|
Originally Posted by Al Czervik
(Post 3299247)
Apparently 2,000 new hires next year. Don’t think that’s possible but it’s what I’m hearing.
|
It’s officially what they’re trying to do. Whether they get there or not remains to be seen. If they’re trying for 2000 even if they don’t get there it will still likely be the most pilots ever hired at AA ever.
|
Originally Posted by Tjeff
(Post 3299284)
It’s officially what they’re trying to do. Whether they get there or not remains to be seen. If they’re trying for 2000 even if they don’t get there it will still likely be the most pilots ever hired at AA ever.
|
test
any info on the test on the AA application?
|
Originally Posted by Al Czervik
(Post 3299247)
Apparently 2,000 new hires next year. Don’t think that’s possible but it’s what I’m hearing.
They are under the impression AA is behind the curve. |
Originally Posted by El Peso
(Post 3299300)
Where did you hear that it’s official? I have not seen any such communication. Also, I’ll go on record and say right now that that’s impossible, unless they do zero upgrades and use the entirety of the training department to train new hires alone.
|
Originally Posted by El Peso
(Post 3299300)
Where did you hear that it’s official? I have not seen any such communication. Also, I’ll go on record and say right now that that’s impossible, unless they do zero upgrades and use the entirety of the training department to train new hires alone.
Although it is not likely to succeed, it is better that they are setting lofty goals and fall a little short than to set easy goals to begin with. AA is in much better position to hire large amounts now than any point in the past. Recurrent training is 12 months, and not 9 months. There is no current backlog at all. Fewer fleet types mean less training cycles needed overall. Not much movement in the wide bodies as compared to the past (fewer wide bodies all together with less flying and no real new deliveries of aircraft). Not to mention, by this point, most everyone is settled in to their seat. Not many 737 guys at this point are leaving for the 320, and vice-versa. There are several Check Airman vacancies that are being filled now, and they have been hiring ground instructors and sim instructors like crazy. AA has all of their sims up and running, and has contracted thousands of sim sessions (mostly on the 737) from outside venders (mostly in Dallas). |
Originally Posted by Al Czervik
(Post 3299247)
Apparently 2,000 new hires next year. Don’t think that’s possible but it’s what I’m hearing.
|
I'll believe it when I see it, but even if we're limited by training saturation it'll be a good ride.
|
Originally Posted by vore
(Post 3299301)
any info on the test on the AA application?
|
Which Facebook group? Has it been confirmed as a glitch?
|
Hiring 2000 people a year is different from training 2000.
If they’re concerned about losing top candidates, the plan might be to take everyone and accept a backlog |
Originally Posted by ZeroTT
(Post 3299489)
Hiring 2000 people a year is different from training 2000.
If they’re concerned about losing top candidates, the plan might be to take everyone and accept a backlog |
Originally Posted by El Peso
(Post 3299498)
And if they want to accomplish that, they’d need to become the #1 destination for pilots. Dragging out contract negotiations and telling us, final offer, take it or leave it, isnt gonna cut it I’m afraid.
Frustration will set in. Unless they have a strong preference for AA, they are likely to jump ship when another offer by a major comes along. |
Yeah, I think it's more likely that the 2000 number is BS. Guys in the training department say all sorts of stuff.
|
Originally Posted by biigD
(Post 3299510)
Yeah, I think it's more likely that the 2000 number is BS. Guys in the training department say all sorts of stuff.
just escaped GSW last week for CQ and every instructor in class said 90 per month(one new hire class each week). They were more concerned where the applicants will be coming from, ie:experience. |
Originally Posted by TransWorld
(Post 3299503)
What if they hire you, but defer training for 6 months to a year? Then in 2023 they need to hire a good sized amount, near their current training capacity. All they create is a bow wave.
Frustration will set in. Unless they have a strong preference for AA, they are likely to jump ship when another offer by a major comes along. |
Originally Posted by El Peso
(Post 3299543)
If it was me and I lived in an AA hub, Id wait for AA. Even take the other offer and wait it out there. If I didn’t live in an AA hub and got another offer from a big 5 carrier while in the pool, I’d be gone and not look back.
|
Current LCA at a wholly owned with a 2 year degree, are chances of getting hired slim without the 4 year degree?
|
Originally Posted by Elisia76
(Post 3299842)
Current LCA at a wholly owned with a 2 year degree, are chances of getting hired slim without the 4 year degree?
|
Originally Posted by FlyGuy2021
(Post 3299381)
AA is in much better position to hire large amounts now than any point in the past. Recurrent training is 12 months, and not 9 months. There is no current backlog at all. Fewer fleet types mean less training cycles needed overall.
|
Originally Posted by aewhistleblower
(Post 3298439)
I noticed the Red X just showed up yesterday(I have been frequently reviewing my application) before I had a green check mark on "skills test" instead of "PST"
I emailed AA pilot credentials and AA support, and it seems like the "X" shouldn't be there if you completed the assessment. I'm confused as well... When the PST was posted for me to take there was nothing with a green checkmark or red X in the field with all other green ✅ checkmarks. After taking the PST there was still nothing for about 3 weeks, now a “PST ✅ “ just appeared on my profile which makes me believe I passed it. I’d guess a red ❌ is a “No-Pass” and not an “incomplete information” this is a pass or no pass type of type of teat in my humble opinion. Now the question is, do they give a second chance on the PST??? Most airlines around the world do, but they won’t let re-take the test for another 12 months… I don’t know what it the AA criteria on this. Good luck to all! |
I think its a glitch with the red X People are seeing.
|
Originally Posted by A320 CURSED
(Post 3300026)
Hello folks, here is what I can make out of it in my opinion…
When the PST was posted for me to take there was nothing with a green checkmark or red X in the field with all other green ✅ checkmarks. After taking the PST there was still nothing for about 3 weeks, now a “PST ✅ “ just appeared on my profile which makes me believe I passed it. I’d guess a red ❌ is a “No-Pass” and not an “incomplete information” this is a pass or no pass type of type of teat in my humble opinion. Now the question is, do they give a second chance on the PST??? Most airlines around the world do, but they won’t let re-take the test for another 12 months… I don’t know what it the AA criteria on this. Good luck to all! |
Originally Posted by A320 CURSED
(Post 3300026)
Hello folks, here is what I can make out of it in my opinion…
When the PST was posted for me to take there was nothing with a green checkmark or red X in the field with all other green ✅ checkmarks. After taking the PST there was still nothing for about 3 weeks, now a “PST ✅ “ just appeared on my profile which makes me believe I passed it. I’d guess a red ❌ is a “No-Pass” and not an “incomplete information” this is a pass or no pass type of type of teat in my humble opinion. Now the question is, do they give a second chance on the PST??? Most airlines around the world do, but they won’t let re-take the test for another 12 months… I don’t know what it the AA criteria on this. Good luck to all! |
Have all of the previous CJO’s been placed or are there still some waiting for class dates?
|
Originally Posted by Hardlanding
(Post 3300050)
Have all of the previous CJO’s been placed or are there still some waiting for class dates?
2 classes of 40 in sep 3 of 40 in oct My guesstimate is by November pool should be depleted. |
Originally Posted by ItwillBuffout
(Post 3300057)
there were about 300 cjos issued pre covid..
2 classes of 40 in sep 3 of 40 in oct My guesstimate is by November pool should be depleted. |
The plan for 2022 is to hire 45 every week for the entire year, those hired this fall might be lineholders by the spring.
|
Originally Posted by Dunkin
(Post 3300153)
The plan for 2022 is to hire 45 every week for the entire year, those hired this fall might be lineholders by the spring.
4 classes per month (would skip the 5th "Wednesday" of the month for the months that happen to have 5 Wednesdays), so 48 classes. December would only have 2 classes, so a total of 46. 46 weeks * 45 per class = 2070, which is right about the 2000 number that we keep hearing. Allowing for a few classes to fall just short of the 45 number, as tends to happen with people having emergencies, etc... |
Originally Posted by Hardlanding
(Post 3300050)
Have all of the previous CJO’s been placed or are there still some waiting for class dates?
I’m still waiting on my class dates. Hopefully the 3 Nov class. |
Originally Posted by FlyGuy2021
(Post 3300168)
According to the potential future Indoc schedule, it will actually be 45 per week, 46 weeks of the year.
4 classes per month (would skip the 5th "Wednesday" of the month for the months that happen to have 5 Wednesdays), so 48 classes. December would only have 2 classes, so a total of 46. 46 weeks * 45 per class = 2070, which is right about the 2000 number that we keep hearing. Allowing for a few classes to fall just short of the 45 number, as tends to happen with people having emergencies, etc... |
Originally Posted by chrisreedrules
(Post 3300383)
Not that it matters to any of the APA guys here, but for any wholly owned pilots waiting to flow that happen to read this, the flow just became that much more worthless at the current metrics. 2,000 pilots in 2022 is double the usual and basically means you’re set back further on the seniority list if you’re waiting to flow.
|
Originally Posted by Tjeff
(Post 3300385)
Apply outside the flow they will be interviewing more then ever.
|
Originally Posted by chrisreedrules
(Post 3300383)
Not that it matters to any of the APA guys here, but for any wholly owned pilots waiting to flow that happen to read this, the flow just became that much more worthless at the current metrics. 2,000 pilots in 2022 is double the usual and basically means you’re set back further on the seniority list if you’re waiting to flow.
|
Originally Posted by Dunkin
(Post 3300496)
You’re right, it doesn’t matter to any APA pilot. In fact it’s better for us if the WO carriers can’t staff their flying due to attrition, gives us more leverage to bring that flying back in house. Maybe Embraer would give us a good deal on some E190E2s in exchange for some of the E175s. I hear UAL is hiring a bunch of PSA pilots…….
And yeah, Make Group 1 Great Again. |
Originally Posted by Dunkin
(Post 3300496)
You’re right, it doesn’t matter to any APA pilot. In fact it’s better for us if the WO carriers can’t staff their flying due to attrition, gives us more leverage to bring that flying back in house. Maybe Embraer would give us a good deal on some E190E2s in exchange for some of the E175s. I hear UAL is hiring a bunch of PSA pilots…….
|
All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:20 AM. |
User Alert System provided by
Advanced User Tagging v3.3.0 (Lite) -
vBulletin Mods & Addons Copyright © 2024 DragonByte Technologies Ltd.
Website Copyright ©2000 - 2017 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands