APA officially in negotiations with ALPA
Yesterday | 06:25 PM
#383
Line Holder
Joined: Sep 2021
Posts: 397
Likes: 80
From: CA
Yeah I saw earlier, thank god. Time to rescind (vote to repeal) this ridiculous Gustin Amendment.
Yesterday | 08:32 PM
#384
Line Holder
Joined: May 2021
Posts: 405
Likes: 53
As someone who leans ALPA in this whole process, doesn’t repealing the gustin amendment move the goal posts a bit? We couldn’t seem to organize a card drive to get 50% +1 to force a vote so instead we are looking for something less than a majority of eligible voters to get a future merger to pass.
I’m all for this merger process but also interested in what’s fair and equitable to the whole pilot group.
I’d figure there’s 1/4 of the pilot group that doesn’t care who represents us. Is that their problem? I guess it makes it so. Or is the argument that these people should be informed and involved and must vote one way or the other?
I’m all for this merger process but also interested in what’s fair and equitable to the whole pilot group.
I’d figure there’s 1/4 of the pilot group that doesn’t care who represents us. Is that their problem? I guess it makes it so. Or is the argument that these people should be informed and involved and must vote one way or the other?
Yesterday | 08:41 PM
#385
Line Holder
Joined: Feb 2017
Posts: 355
Likes: 119
As someone who leans ALPA in this whole process, doesn’t repealing the gustin amendment move the goal posts a bit? We couldn’t seem to organize a card drive to get 50% +1 to force a vote so instead we are looking for something less than a majority of eligible voters to get a future merger to pass.
I’m all for this merger process but also interested in what’s fair and equitable to the whole pilot group.
I’d figure there’s 1/4 of the pilot group that doesn’t care who represents us. Is that their problem? I guess it makes it so. Or is the argument that these people should be informed and involved and must vote one way or the other?
I’m all for this merger process but also interested in what’s fair and equitable to the whole pilot group.
I’d figure there’s 1/4 of the pilot group that doesn’t care who represents us. Is that their problem? I guess it makes it so. Or is the argument that these people should be informed and involved and must vote one way or the other?
Yesterday | 10:41 PM
#386
Line Holder
Joined: Jul 2021
Posts: 621
Likes: 47
Can you even vote away future voting rights?
Amendment stands via a vote, and can’t undone with a new vote?
How does todays voting body establish authority over a future voting body?
Today | 12:19 AM
#387
Line Holder
Joined: Sep 2021
Posts: 397
Likes: 80
From: CA
As someone who leans ALPA in this whole process, doesn’t repealing the gustin amendment move the goal posts a bit? We couldn’t seem to organize a card drive to get 50% +1 to force a vote so instead we are looking for something less than a majority of eligible voters to get a future merger to pass.
I’m all for this merger process but also interested in what’s fair and equitable to the whole pilot group.
I’d figure there’s 1/4 of the pilot group that doesn’t care who represents us. Is that their problem? I guess it makes it so. Or is the argument that these people should be informed and involved and must vote one way or the other?
I’m all for this merger process but also interested in what’s fair and equitable to the whole pilot group.
I’d figure there’s 1/4 of the pilot group that doesn’t care who represents us. Is that their problem? I guess it makes it so. Or is the argument that these people should be informed and involved and must vote one way or the other?
Today | 04:28 AM
#388
On Reserve
Joined: Apr 2025
Posts: 14
Likes: 18
Originally Posted by rockelino;[url=tel:4034795
4034795[/url]]You have it backwards - APA (Gustin) moved the goal posts by enacting this stupid "amendment" without membership approval. They moved the goal posts in 2023 and didn't ask for our opinion.
Today | 04:40 AM
#389
Line Holder
Joined: Feb 2017
Posts: 355
Likes: 119
Yes, we can absolutely vote the moratorium away down the road if we so choose. This entire thing is a massive distraction and expensive, we don’t need to do it every 5 years.
Today | 05:39 AM
#390
Line Holder
Joined: Mar 2026
Posts: 217
Likes: 218
As someone who leans ALPA in this whole process, doesn’t repealing the gustin amendment move the goal posts a bit? We couldn’t seem to organize a card drive to get 50% +1 to force a vote so instead we are looking for something less than a majority of eligible voters to get a future merger to pass.
I’m all for this merger process but also interested in what’s fair and equitable to the whole pilot group.
I’d figure there’s 1/4 of the pilot group that doesn’t care who represents us. Is that their problem? I guess it makes it so. Or is the argument that these people should be informed and involved and must vote one way or the other?
I’m all for this merger process but also interested in what’s fair and equitable to the whole pilot group.
I’d figure there’s 1/4 of the pilot group that doesn’t care who represents us. Is that their problem? I guess it makes it so. Or is the argument that these people should be informed and involved and must vote one way or the other?
If APA didn't want their existence in danger maybe they shouldn't have ignored the majority of the pilot group during the last contract negotiation in favor of a few loud voices from The Line. Actions have consequences. sorry not sorry
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
