Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > American
AA Pilots Unite Or Fold Forever >

AA Pilots Unite Or Fold Forever

Search

Notices

AA Pilots Unite Or Fold Forever

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 01-05-2015 | 11:51 AM
  #81  
texaspilot76's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,458
Likes: 0
From: Right Seat
Default

Originally Posted by MarineGrunt
Destroying future? I think thats just a little bit dramatic...

I am in the NO column right now (if I was able to vote) based on some QOL items, but if it passes, it certainly doesn't destroy my future.

I don't know why APA didn't slide the Delta contract across the table from the very beginning, but I expect nothing less when section 6 negotiations start.
No kidding. All you hardcore unionists keep projecting this doom and gloom. I think there's a more political union agenda behind all that rhetoric. "Oh no! The sky is falling!"

I agree with the post above that when regular section 6 comes up, if the company is still profitable, we will have the leverage to secure a Delta or better contract. We do not have that ability right now.
Reply
Old 01-05-2015 | 11:54 AM
  #82  
Banned
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 8,350
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by KiloAlpha
Has anyone talked to their union reps regarding the possible effects of the 2018 Cadillac Healthcare plan review?

What does this provision allow the company to do? Can they act unilaterally?

This issue alone could all but nullify the shiny pay raises.
The value plan is at company discretion. Cadillac affects the other two and this could be arbitrated. From my understanding though, we have a reverse "me too" scenario that puts us in the same boat as other employee groups and thus our premiums could end up in the Obama Care range. They could get all that money back and then some.

But don't look at the man behind the curtain.......look over here......here.....I have some shiny candy for you !
Reply
Old 01-05-2015 | 12:02 PM
  #83  
texaspilot76's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 1,458
Likes: 0
From: Right Seat
Default

Originally Posted by eaglefly
The value plan is at company discretion. Cadillac affects the other two and this could be arbitrated. From my understanding though, we have a reverse "me too" scenario that puts us in the same boat as other employee groups and thus our premiums could end up in the Obama Care range. They could get all that money back and then some.

But don't look at the man behind the curtain.......look over here......here.....I have some shiny candy for you !
If I'm not mistaken, under the law, the company is required to pay the tax.

The best way to insure that our healthcare won't erode further, short of a supreme court victory, is for everyone to vote in a Republican president in 2016.
Reply
Old 01-05-2015 | 12:05 PM
  #84  
Banned
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 8,350
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by MarineGrunt
Destroying future? I think thats just a little bit dramatic...

I am in the NO column right now (if I was able to vote) based on some QOL items, but if it passes, it certainly doesn't destroy my future.

I don't know why APA didn't slide the Delta contract across the table from the very beginning, but I expect nothing less when section 6 negotiations start.
It doesn't ?

Could you tell me what your strategy is in 2020 when we once again drop to our knees and pray Parker doesn't say "no" ?



Specifically,

A. Tell me what leverage we will have with our broken group still blaming each other for this disaster who will all be older with many who haven't already retired, are very close to it ?

B. Tell me what leverage we will have with the worst (most competitively advantageous to management) work rules and benefits of all the competitive legacy carriers ?

C. Tell me what leverage we will have with the lowest pay scales of the big three ?

D. Explain why Parker won't kick the can for another 5 years after that considering the above future FACTS ?

E. Convince me as an older, more senior pilot much CLOSER to retirement why I shouldn't act in self-interest as many advocate now (rationalized or not) for a few extra bucks and a little sooner as opposed to the more favorable long-term interests of the group, especially when I'll be gone before any succeeding agreement ?

Make it good, because next time around without a believable plan nor a GROUP to stand with, I'll have flipped big time and trust me.......I'll have plenty of company.

Your move.
Reply
Old 01-05-2015 | 12:08 PM
  #85  
MarineGrunt's Avatar
Unfaithfully yours, Hank
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 222
Likes: 0
From: All
Default

Originally Posted by texaspilot76
If I'm not mistaken, under the law, the company is required to pay the tax.

The best way to insure that our healthcare won't erode further, short of a supreme court victory, is for everyone to vote in a Republican president in 2016.
The R's will never get rid of Obamacare even if they had the perfect opportunity. Just like the Dems will never sign on to immigration reform (could have had 100% their way in 08-10). They all need their bogeyman to fight against.... but thats another topic entirely....
Reply
Old 01-05-2015 | 12:10 PM
  #86  
Banned
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 8,350
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by texaspilot76
If I'm not mistaken, under the law, the company is required to pay the tax.

The best way to insure that our healthcare won't erode further, short of a supreme court victory, is for everyone to vote in a Republican president in 2016.
Not likely on the P vote...and again, with reverse "me too", we'd be tethered to others and in 5 years, what's that going to cost in premiums ?

$15-17,000 annual with perhaps a $5000 deductible ?

I hope you save a lot of that money from here on out, pal.

You're going to need it.

AAG's biggest labor albatross is health care now that pensions have been gutted. Trust me, in that respect, he'll dump us out like soiled laundry and why shouldn't he ?

It's not like we're going to do anything about it, eh ?
Reply
Old 01-05-2015 | 12:12 PM
  #87  
Banned
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 8,350
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by MarineGrunt
The R's will never get rid of Obamacare even if they had the perfect opportunity. Just like the Dems will never sign on to immigration reform (could have had 100% their way in 08-10). They all need their bogeyman to fight against.... but thats another topic entirely....
Saw a thing on TV news evaluating the next P bid. Basically came to the conclusion that Hillary will need only something like 1/4 of the electoral votes that will be in play. In other words, our next President will wear skirts, regardless of who the R's field unless she flops over before then.
Reply
Old 01-05-2015 | 12:12 PM
  #88  
MarineGrunt's Avatar
Unfaithfully yours, Hank
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 222
Likes: 0
From: All
Default

Originally Posted by eaglefly
It doesn't ?

Could you tell me what your strategy is in 2020 when we once again drop to our knees and pray Parker doesn't say "no" ?



Specifically,

A. Tell me what leverage we will have with our broken group still blaming each other for this disaster who will all be older with many who haven't already retired, are very close to it ?

B. Tell me what leverage we will have with the worst (most competitively advantageous to management) work rules and benefits of all the competitive legacy carriers ?

C. Tell me what leverage we will have with the lowest pay scales of the big three ?

D. Explain why Parker won't kick the can for another 5 years after that considering the above future FACTS ?

E. Convince me as an older, more senior pilot much CLOSER to retirement why I shouldn't act in self-interest as many advocate now (rationalized or not) for a few extra bucks and a little sooner as opposed to the more favorable long-term interests of the group, especially when I'll be gone before any succeeding agreement ?

Make it good, because next time around without a believable plan nor a GROUP to stand with, I'll have flipped big time and trust me.......I'll have plenty of company.

Your move.
A-E) Destroying one's credibility/standing for future negotiations is a far cry from "destroying one's future." Even that is debatable. But I'll let you guys that live your lives on this forum to hash that one out....
Reply
Old 01-05-2015 | 12:21 PM
  #89  
Banned
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 8,350
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by MarineGrunt
A-E) Destroying one's credibility/standing for future negotiations is a far cry from "destroying one's future." Even that is debatable. But I'll let you guys that live your lives on this forum to hash that one out....
That's what I thought.

No plan whatsoever.

See you in 2020 my friend when I'll advocate giving Doug a blank piece of paper to fill in the blanks if it gets me a little more $$$ in 2020 vs. him stalling for 5 years.

The only variable is what he fills in the blanks to pay for it.

That will be the majority philosophy from all the old geezers in their late 50's and 60's who will be the majority (heck....that's a significant percentage of the yes crowd NOW !). Everyone needs to plan their foxhole position now and to all those who think anything will be different in 2020, well,....................pucker up, Buttercup.
Reply
Old 01-05-2015 | 12:33 PM
  #90  
MarineGrunt's Avatar
Unfaithfully yours, Hank
 
Joined: Nov 2006
Posts: 222
Likes: 0
From: All
Default

Originally Posted by eaglefly
That's what I thought.

No plan whatsoever.

See you in 2020 my friend when I'll advocate giving Doug a blank piece of paper to fill in the blanks if it gets me a little more $$$ in 2020 vs. him stalling for 5 years.

The only variable is what he fills in the blanks to pay for it.

That will be the majority philosophy from all the old geezers in their late 50's and 60's who will be the majority (heck....that's a significant percentage of the yes crowd NOW !). Everyone needs to plan their foxhole position now and to all those who think anything will be different in 2020, well,....................pucker up, Buttercup.
W-T-F are you talking about??? I was pointing out the absurdity of you saying that some are in the process of destroying our future and you somehow want my point-by-point plan for 2020 as a retort???

By the way.... my "plan" is to vote NO on this proposal in case you didn't catch it already.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Tsuda
Regional
44
03-20-2014 04:52 AM
Acroflyer32
American
85
02-05-2014 11:10 PM
TruthHurts
United
64
04-02-2012 10:23 AM
bgmann
Regional
33
11-19-2011 07:33 PM
John Pennekamp
Major
31
02-13-2007 01:08 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices