Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Cargo
Why UPS needs a new contract... >

Why UPS needs a new contract...

Search
Notices
Cargo Part 121 cargo airlines

Why UPS needs a new contract...

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-12-2006, 03:33 PM
  #21  
EIGHTMENOUT1
Guest
 
Posts: n/a
Default UPS Contract

There are just so many $$$$ in the pot. The IPA can divide it any way it wants to. In the end, the captains will benefit the most; they always do.
 
Old 04-12-2006, 04:56 PM
  #22  
Gets Weekends Off
 
L'il J.Seinfeld's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Oct 2005
Position: Brown
Posts: 1,126
Default

So many $$ in the pot?? Not true in this case. There are enough dollars to rectify this contract and make it appropriate. It's not like we are asking for a Delta/United pre-9/11 contract. Just make us on par with FedEx, who by the way are about to get an even better contract as well.
L'il J.Seinfeld is offline  
Old 04-12-2006, 06:08 PM
  #23  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Nov 2005
Position: A300 Cpt
Posts: 65
Default

Originally Posted by L'il J.Seinfeld
I would beg to differ that UPS is indeed attracting "quality pilots". Also, new hires do pay union dues, but are not represented by the IPA.

No they do not pay union due until their second year.

BrownBusDriver
BrownBusDriver is offline  
Old 04-12-2006, 06:17 PM
  #24  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2005
Position: CA 767
Posts: 402
Default

Originally Posted by L'il J.Seinfeld
Yeah, I meant initiation fees regarding union dues.

15-20% more than FedEx for FO would be pushing it. But I agree if FO pay is below the FedEX widebody scale, I'll be voting no. More and more newhires are getting off probation and it is changing the dynamics of the pilot group. Call me a dreamer, but I think a TA will come next month and it will be one that we all will be somehat happy with.
Wishful Thinking. But I can already tell all you care about, or at least talk about, is money. I, and many others will be voting NO because of Art. 13. Deadheading up to 18 hours. Sleeping on Floors. Very few Commercials. Forced Overtime. If this comes out, they can shove it up their ass. Screw the money, the wife going to take half, since your never home. And then you'll die at 61. No way.
Nashmd11 is offline  
Old 04-12-2006, 06:25 PM
  #25  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Nov 2005
Position: CA 767
Posts: 402
Default

You are so wrong. I have been told, face to face, that we are asking for a pre-911 contract. This from Tom and Jim at different times. What I'm really afraid of is a "Cost Nuetral" contract. This is what is happening. Whatever pay raise we get, the company will get it back in spades with our Scheduling article. Read Article 13!!!!!!!!!!!
Nashmd11 is offline  
Old 04-12-2006, 06:36 PM
  #26  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Packer Backer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Feb 2006
Posts: 292
Default

Originally Posted by Priority 3
Why only match FedEx? We're far more profitable a company; we should be negotiating pay that is 15 to 20% above the FedEx pay rate sheet.

I think our negotiators will send us a POS T/A that we'll have to stamp "no" to.
I think you guys should go for UAL +1%.





Easy guys, just kidding.....
Packer Backer is offline  
Old 04-12-2006, 07:00 PM
  #27  
Line Holder
 
Joined APC: Sep 2005
Position: MD-11
Posts: 43
Cool

UPS is going to raise their 1st year pay when they have to, and right now, with the carnage going on in the industry, they dont have to.
No one on the property is going to negotiate away one thing to fix the first year pay either, no matter how much they might say otherwise.

Folks hire on knowing what they are getting into, I'm not saying it shouldn't
be better, and having recently endured it, I know, but if you are going to concentrate your angst, it should be on scope, scope, and scope. No one is going to vote NO if the only thing they don't like in the TA is low 1st year pay, period.

ISFS, TB
TurboBeaver is offline  
Old 04-12-2006, 09:55 PM
  #28  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Trash Hauler 1's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2005
Posts: 325
Default Get your ass back in the NASC

Originally Posted by EIGHTMENOUT1
There are just so many $$$$ in the pot. The IPA can divide it any way it wants to. In the end, the captains will benefit the most; they always do.
Managers (you) should just just shut up and color. Go give Barr a reach-around and leave this forum to the real pilots
Trash Hauler 1 is offline  
Old 04-13-2006, 05:47 AM
  #29  
Gets Weekends Off
 
AmericanIdiot#1's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Nov 2005
Position: Former 757/767 F/O, now MD-11
Posts: 148
Default Stuff

In the 767, you CAN sleep on the floor if you use the catering box, ball up your overcoat and jacket and use them as a pillow...in front of the galley. ANYTHING is possible.

Originally Posted by L'il J.Seinfeld
Money? I guess you are right. I'll sleep on the floor if you pay me enough.
AmericanIdiot#1 is offline  
Old 04-13-2006, 10:32 AM
  #30  
Freightmama!
 
Freightpuppy's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2005
Position: 757/767 FO
Posts: 2,880
Default

Originally Posted by Nashmd11
You are so wrong. I have been told, face to face, that we are asking for a pre-911 contract. This from Tom and Jim at different times. What I'm really afraid of is a "Cost Nuetral" contract. This is what is happening. Whatever pay raise we get, the company will get it back in spades with our Scheduling article. Read Article 13!!!!!!!!!!!
I heard that some doing the negotiations want to sacrifice scheduling rules for retirement???? Screw that!
Freightpuppy is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Freighter Captain
Cargo
29
05-22-2007 07:51 AM
Freight Dog
Cargo
18
08-14-2006 07:15 AM
Browntail
Cargo
7
06-28-2006 05:23 PM
Freighter Captain
Atlas/Polar
3
08-03-2005 03:19 PM
Freighter Captain
Cargo
0
07-05-2005 09:50 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices