Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Cargo
FAA Says *** You to Cargo Pilots >

FAA Says *** You to Cargo Pilots

Notices
Cargo Part 121 cargo airlines

FAA Says *** You to Cargo Pilots

Old 12-10-2014, 07:44 AM
  #11  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2013
Posts: 1,339
Default

Originally Posted by Firsttimeflyer View Post
Bad and good. Next time you cargo guys jumpseat on a pax 121 carrier, ask them about the impact to their schedules and QOL thanks to 117.

I'd say on average you will work 1-2 days more per month to make the same pay compared to the previous rules...or take the pay hit to keep the same amount of days off.

I'd say it hurt the pairings and most operators making the flying much less efficient.

Not saying I agree with the FAAs decision, just pointing out what has happened to schedules and those impacted by 117.
I have been asking. My friends at Delta, United and SWA are either positive or neutral, in other words, changes are so small they're barely noticeable.

A pilot's quality of life is directly proportional to the number of pilots behind him/her on the seniority list. Part 117 has forced airlines to hire in record numbers. At one of the WAI job seminars a United recruiter said at least 10% of hiring is due to the new rest rules. Those rules are much more restrictive for night flying. If United, an airline which flies primarily during the day (starting trips, domicile time) imagine how many pilots fedex and ups would have to hire.

Common Sense 101 - if fedex and ups management spends millions and millions of dollars fighting a new regulation you know that regulation must be beneficial to pilots.

Last edited by whalesurfer; 12-10-2014 at 07:57 AM.
whalesurfer is offline  
Old 12-10-2014, 07:51 AM
  #12  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,173
Default

If the changes are so small they don't matter, than I guess I have one less thing in my life to get spun up about. But I would guess that the impact of the changes depend on whether or not you commute. Most passenger carriers don't have the high percentage of commuters that FedEx does.
Rock is offline  
Old 12-10-2014, 07:52 AM
  #13  
Gets Weekends Off
 
labbats's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2006
Position: A320
Posts: 1,347
Default

Best part of 117 is they can no longer push back your showtime and then the duty day is no longer 16 hours. I for one think it's a big improvement.
labbats is offline  
Old 12-10-2014, 07:57 AM
  #14  
Stuck Mic
 
Firsttimeflyer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2013
Posts: 1,059
Default

Originally Posted by FDXLAG View Post
I am pretty sure it is not a coincidence that Delta is hiring a 100 a month.
Not sure what you meant by this comment.

But I'd chalk the hiring going on based on the upcoming and currently happening retirements, growth, reduction in regional flying which will increase major flying, FAR 117 staffing and probably some other factors as well. The biggest factor being retirements.
Firsttimeflyer is offline  
Old 12-10-2014, 08:03 AM
  #15  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2013
Posts: 1,339
Default

Originally Posted by Rock View Post
If the changes are so small they don't matter, than I guess I have one less thing in my life to get spun up about....
You must be senior since 10% extra bodies means nothing to you.
..and those "small changes" apply to primarily day-flying airlines. I'd imagine those changes would be much greater, i.e. more new hires, at primarily night-flying cargo airlines.
PS. Pax airlines have a large percentage of commuters too.
whalesurfer is offline  
Old 12-10-2014, 08:09 AM
  #16  
Stuck Mic
 
Firsttimeflyer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2013
Posts: 1,059
Default

Originally Posted by contrails View Post
I don't know if I'm an anomaly or what, but my schedule and my schedule flexibility is vastly improved with 117.

16 hours on duty?? 8:00hr layover commencing while waiting for the hotel van?? Never again.

Don't think 117 is bad stuff, it's not.
There are definitely some good things out of 117. I love not having less than 10 hours. At the regional I was at we would be scheduled with reduced rest. I would fly a 4 day with under 30 hours of scheduled rest on the overnights, all while doing 20+ legs in those 4 days.
Also some bad things....like having to ride DH in the back to LGA just in case the weather gets bad and the crew doing the turn to LGA flying the plane isn't legal to fly it back due to the hard limit on flight time.
This summer was full of those.
I've been lazy and haven't found/paid for an app to track it, but the rolling Duty/time limits are pretty difficult to keep track of.

And you can still do 16 hour days if you take the 2 hr extension.
Firsttimeflyer is offline  
Old 12-10-2014, 08:22 AM
  #17  
Stuck Mic
 
Firsttimeflyer's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Dec 2013
Posts: 1,059
Default

Originally Posted by whalesurfer View Post
I have been asking. My friends at Delta, United and SWA are either positive or neutral, in other words, changes are so small they're barely noticeable.

A pilot's quality of life is directly proportional to the number of pilots behind him/her on the seniority list. Part 117 has forced airlines to hire in record numbers. At one of the WAI job seminars a United recruiter said at least 10% of hiring is due to the new rest rules. Those rules are much more restrictive for night flying. If United, an airline which flies primarily during the day (starting trips, domicile time) imagine how many pilots fedex and ups would have to hire.

Common Sense 101 - if fedex and ups management spends millions and millions of dollars fighting a new regulation you know that regulation must be beneficial to pilots.
Which kind of proves my point. 10% more pilots to cover the same amount of flying. If you aren't legal to do the same flying pre-117, you are either working more days or getting paid less...unless you are on reserve getting guarantee and min days off. Seniority definitely plays a role, as does pairing generation software and the parameters placed upon it.

Night flying is definitely more restrictive which I think it's extremely important due to the effects on circadian rhythms and internal clocks and the like. I really don't like red eyes at all!

And I truly appreciate the rides you guys have given me while commuting and I certainly don't envy the night schedules.

Again, I don't agree with the FAAs decision and I think 117 should be applied to all operators. And it definitely makes sense to me why management would spend the money, saves them a ton of money over the long run. Hopefully it can be applied to you cargo guys soon. Not sure what the best way to go about it is, other than to continue to lobby elected officials, and emphasize physiological factors in any ASAP reports.
Firsttimeflyer is offline  
Old 12-10-2014, 08:23 AM
  #18  
Line Holder
 
TazPilot's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Jun 2006
Position: B767 Both Seats
Posts: 37
Default Reserve under part 117

The big difference is staffing for adequate reserve coverage. No more endless reserve days where they can call you out for a 16 hour duty day at the end of your reserve coverage window.....
TazPilot is offline  
Old 12-10-2014, 08:29 AM
  #19  
Gets Weekends Off
 
contrails's Avatar
 
Joined APC: Mar 2005
Posts: 1,943
Default

Originally Posted by Firsttimeflyer View Post
Also some bad things....like having to ride DH in the back to LGA just in case the weather gets bad and the crew doing the turn to LGA flying the plane isn't legal to fly it back due to the hard limit on flight time.
You realize this means a carrier that runs a quality operation has to staff more reserve pilots, right?

Originally Posted by Firsttimeflyer View Post
And you can still do 16 hour days if you take the 2 hr extension.
Yeah -- you can sell a mansion for $100, too -- but why would you?
contrails is offline  
Old 12-10-2014, 08:36 AM
  #20  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jan 2007
Posts: 1,173
Default

Originally Posted by whalesurfer View Post
You must be senior since 10% extra bodies means nothing to you.
..and those "small changes" apply to primarily day-flying airlines. I'd imagine those changes would be much greater, i.e. more new hires, at primarily night-flying cargo airlines.
PS. Pax airlines have a large percentage of commuters too.
I said "10% extra bodies means nothing"? Maybe I'm too junior to understand the impact of that. Hopefully you are senior enough to explain it to me.
Rock is offline  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
FEtrip7
Cargo
38
02-16-2012 02:25 PM
Timeoff2fish
Safety
69
12-29-2011 06:23 AM
RPC Unity
Union Talk
149
06-30-2011 08:39 PM
SF340guy
Union Talk
92
06-12-2011 06:30 PM
fireman0174
Major
46
11-19-2006 05:49 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Your Privacy Choices