Phenom 100 300 takeoff landing dist
04-15-2018, 04:06 PM
#54
Number Last
Joined APC: Sep 2017
Position: Boeing voice activated systems and ACARS commander
Posts: 442
Originally Posted by Kimo
Little thing called water and a big thing called out of glide distance. Wouldn't want the FAA metermaids on this forum have something else to tell me I'm doing wrong. It's an overseas project on islands but all of the airports are within 10mins. So to get back to what I originally asked about it looks like the 800lbs pencils out to a 2500ft runway. I'm sorry you guys are so emotional and want to call everyone stupid but it only makes you guys look silly.
Proof that you can't fix stupid. If you weren't going to like the answer, why ask the question? I think your mind was made up from the start.
04-15-2018, 04:11 PM
#55
Number Last
Joined APC: Sep 2017
Position: Boeing voice activated systems and ACARS commander
Posts: 442
Originally Posted by Kimo
Never been there but looks like a fun place to go! Curious to know why you're trying to track my whereabouts. Are you planning on doing harm to me?
04-15-2018, 04:26 PM
#56
Line Holder
Thread Starter
Joined APC: Sep 2016
Position: Small and slow
Posts: 64
Originally Posted by PowderFinger
Emotional? Silly?
Proof that you can't fix stupid. If you weren't going to like the answer, why ask the question? I think your mind was made up from the start.
Proof that you can't fix stupid. If you weren't going to like the answer, why ask the question? I think your mind was made up from the start.
04-15-2018, 04:31 PM
#58
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jun 2008
Position: PIC Challenger 605
Posts: 454
The Mustang and the Phenom are worlds apart when it comes to runway performance. I'm typed in both so please take my word on that. The biggest difference is that the Mustang has ground spoilers, which the early Phenom 100s did not.
I've operated a Mustang out of a 2700 ft runway. In my opinion, it wasn't the smartest thing to do, but it was legal. The plane could take off out of that runway with over 2 hours of flying fuel (plus reserve).
I wouldn't have dreamt of taking the Phenom in to a sub 4000 ft runway. The brakes are horrible and the early models had no ability to dump the lift. Anything other than a dry runway and my min runway went up exponentially.
Your original question asks about 4-6 passengers though, so most people in this thread would assume that you mean the Phenom 300.
I've operated a Mustang out of a 2700 ft runway. In my opinion, it wasn't the smartest thing to do, but it was legal. The plane could take off out of that runway with over 2 hours of flying fuel (plus reserve).
I wouldn't have dreamt of taking the Phenom in to a sub 4000 ft runway. The brakes are horrible and the early models had no ability to dump the lift. Anything other than a dry runway and my min runway went up exponentially.
Your original question asks about 4-6 passengers though, so most people in this thread would assume that you mean the Phenom 300.
04-15-2018, 04:34 PM
#59
Line Holder
Thread Starter
Joined APC: Sep 2016
Position: Small and slow
Posts: 64
Originally Posted by galaxy flyer
Kimo,
How about giving us an ICAO location identifier?
GF
How about giving us an ICAO location identifier?
GF
04-15-2018, 04:38 PM
#60
Line Holder
Thread Starter
Joined APC: Sep 2016
Position: Small and slow
Posts: 64
Originally Posted by SrfNFly227
The Mustang and the Phenom are worlds apart when it comes to runway performance. I'm typed in both so please take my word on that. The biggest difference is that the Mustang has ground spoilers, which the early Phenom 100s did not.
I've operated a Mustang out of a 2700 ft runway. In my opinion, it wasn't the smartest thing to do, but it was legal. The plane could take off out of that runway with over 2 hours of flying fuel (plus reserve).
I wouldn't have dreamt of taking the Phenom in to a sub 4000 ft runway. The brakes are horrible and the early models had no ability to dump the lift. Anything other than a dry runway and my min runway went up exponentially.
Your original question asks about 4-6 passengers though, so most people in this thread would assume that you mean the Phenom 300.
I've operated a Mustang out of a 2700 ft runway. In my opinion, it wasn't the smartest thing to do, but it was legal. The plane could take off out of that runway with over 2 hours of flying fuel (plus reserve).
I wouldn't have dreamt of taking the Phenom in to a sub 4000 ft runway. The brakes are horrible and the early models had no ability to dump the lift. Anything other than a dry runway and my min runway went up exponentially.
Your original question asks about 4-6 passengers though, so most people in this thread would assume that you mean the Phenom 300.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
