MD-90 going bye-bye?
#101
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2015
Posts: 278
June 27, 2017 from flightglobal.com
"Delta Air Lines has pulled its first Boeing MD-90 from service, as it prepares to begin a three-year drawdown of its MD-88 fleet.
The aircraft (MSN 53382) was withdrawn from service on 23 June, Flight Fleets Analyzer shows and a spokesman for the Atlanta-based carrier confirms. The aircraft had 58,772 cycles and 31,998 hours at the end of 2016.
The MD-90 was one of the first two delivered to launch customer Delta on 24 March 1995, the database shows."
"Delta Air Lines has pulled its first Boeing MD-90 from service, as it prepares to begin a three-year drawdown of its MD-88 fleet.
The aircraft (MSN 53382) was withdrawn from service on 23 June, Flight Fleets Analyzer shows and a spokesman for the Atlanta-based carrier confirms. The aircraft had 58,772 cycles and 31,998 hours at the end of 2016.
The MD-90 was one of the first two delivered to launch customer Delta on 24 March 1995, the database shows."
#102
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Oct 2009
Posts: 3,108
#104
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2010
Position: window seat
Posts: 12,522
See how easy that was.
#105
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Sep 2009
Posts: 282
They bought the aircraft because the JV they hoped to set up with China was planned to end up with 15 to 16 flights a day on Delta metal to China modeled after the AMS hub. That JV has so far not worked out so the forcus has shifted to Korea. The A330-900 is 50 million cheaper than the A350. A350 orders are being cutback to only 15. The A330-900 will be the big fleet.
#106
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 19,273
That was the same thing KAL wanted a few years back that led to a pullback in that relationship. Fortunently for us they bought a shipping company that is dragging them down and they came back to the table hat in hand.
#108
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Oct 2009
Posts: 3,108
We did not give up our nook in Tokyo, it is dead and buried by better aircraft and a very crafty move by the Japanese to open up Haneda to international flights. China has not worked out because our potential partner wants all the Pacific flying with us doing zero.
That was the same thing KAL wanted a few years back that led to a pullback in that relationship. Fortunently for us they bought a shipping company that is dragging them down and they came back to the table hat in hand.
That was the same thing KAL wanted a few years back that led to a pullback in that relationship. Fortunently for us they bought a shipping company that is dragging them down and they came back to the table hat in hand.
Or do you think no airline will?
Clueless.
#109
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 19,273
If they are profitable why would we drop them? RA was anything but a fool when it came to route planning and as he stated many times each route needed to pull its weight. Next time you are in ATL for training walk over to the Marketing area and talk with the folks running Asia. I suspect you might find it enlighting and you might actually be surprised at how competent they actually are.
#110
If they are profitable why would we drop them? RA was anything but a fool when it came to route planning and as he stated many times each route needed to pull its weight. Next time you are in ATL for training walk over to the Marketing area and talk with the folks running Asia. I suspect you might find it enlighting and you might actually be surprised at how competent they actually are.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post