Notices

MD-90 going bye-bye?

Old 06-26-2017 | 06:55 AM
  #61  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 3,108
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Andy
International widebody flying prints money during good times. It flushes money down the toilet in bad economic times. While I'm very happy to be flying international widebodies at United, our. -400s were flying sub-20% loads across the Pacific during SARS. The cash bleed almost had us joining Pan Am, Eastern, TWA and other airlines in the trash heap of defunct airlines.

JV allows airlines to revenue share without the economic risks. It smooths earnings through good times and bad, increasing long term stability.

As for dominating LAX, I consider American's facilities the best. But even with that, they won't be able to dominate LAX. Delta would do better to set up an international fortress hub in SEA.
When you look at the forecast growth of flying in Asia over the next 20 years, there is no reason Delta for to sit on the sidelines.

Giving our management a free pass with worthless scope is a critical mistake. Just as having over 800 RJs was an unnecessary self induced nightmare.

Sometimes you have to save management from themselves.

In my opinion.
Reply
Old 06-26-2017 | 07:32 AM
  #62  
notEnuf's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 13,210
Likes: 654
From: ir.delta.com
Default

Originally Posted by gzsg
When you look at the forecast growth of flying in Asia over the next 20 years, there is no reason Delta for to sit on the sidelines.

Giving our management a free pass with worthless scope is a critical mistake. Just as having over 800 RJs was an unnecessary self induced nightmare.

Sometimes you have to save management from themselves.

In my opinion.
No worries in 20 years we will still have 650,000 GBHs.
Reply
Old 06-26-2017 | 08:43 AM
  #63  
UCH Pilot
 
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 776
Likes: 1
From: 787
Default

Originally Posted by C130driver
Have you been to the Philippines? 5+ star hotel is dirt cheap, amazing service, cheap drinks and hundreds of beautiful women asking to be your girlfriend...
Asking to be your girlfriend is one thing. Being loved "long time" is what you should be hoping for.
Reply
Old 06-26-2017 | 08:47 AM
  #64  
qball's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2011
Posts: 1,410
Likes: 1
From: Cockpit speaker volume knob set to eleven.
Default

It's the only place I look like a movie star. Every time.
Reply
Old 06-26-2017 | 08:57 AM
  #65  
Thread Starter
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2015
Posts: 1,034
Likes: 2
From: I got into this business so I wouldn't have to work.
Default

Originally Posted by svergin
Asking to be your girlfriend is one thing. Being loved "long time" is what you should be hoping for.
Unfortunately, I fall into the "too beaucoup" category. And I'm not even a soul brother!
Reply
Old 06-26-2017 | 12:35 PM
  #66  
:-)
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 7,339
Likes: 0
Default

Open skies ruined international flying. The bread, and butter is now Domestic where the airlines are all exercising capacity discipline.

The synergies are converting 2 RJ's to a mainline plane.
Reply
Old 06-26-2017 | 02:18 PM
  #67  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2006
Posts: 5,213
Likes: 14
From: guppy CA
Default

Originally Posted by gzsg
When you look at the forecast growth of flying in Asia over the next 20 years, there is no reason Delta for to sit on the sidelines.

Giving our management a free pass with worthless scope is a critical mistake. Just as having over 800 RJs was an unnecessary self induced nightmare.

Sometimes you have to save management from themselves.

In my opinion.
I understand what you're saying, but suggesting Delta management will buy a ton of widebodies is akin to suggesting that Southwest management will be buying a different aircraft than the 737.

I suppose DALPA could come up with contractual language that limits widebody JV flying but management would probably extract quite a bit from the pilots for that language.
Reply
Old 06-26-2017 | 03:02 PM
  #68  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 3,108
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Andy
I understand what you're saying, but suggesting Delta management will buy a ton of widebodies is akin to suggesting that Southwest management will be buying a different aircraft than the 737.

I suppose DALPA could come up with contractual language that limits widebody JV flying but management would probably extract quite a bit from the pilots for that language.
Management can buy whatever planes they choose.

As we have finally done with regional flying, we can use scope language to protect our flying from outsourcing.

As you will see with the Korean JV, our international scope, is almost worthless.

That is unacceptable and must change in C2019.

That is in every Delta pilots best interest.
Reply
Old 06-26-2017 | 08:09 PM
  #69  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Sep 2009
Posts: 284
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by gzsg
As an old guy our almost worthless international scope language won't hurt me much. That being said, I will fight to improve it until I fly my last round trip to Sydney.

I hope the new Delta pilots are reading and paying close attention.

In my opinion this is the number one issue we need to tackle going forward.

Allowing management to outsource our international flying via JVs is not in our best interest, just like allowing over 800 RJs until our regional partners did over 65% of our domestic departures was not in our best interest.

United started SFO to Singapore last year and is now adding LAX to Singapore.

Please spare me the "we can't make money on international".

How did we get to over 800 RJs?

By line pilots repeating the excrement management was whispering in their ear.

"The RJs are saving our bacon!!!"
We can't make $ on Intl because we refuse to acquire the right kind of fleet. Relying on the 763 to cross the Pacific isn't a recipe for success. And all we see are UA, AA and nearly every other Intl airline flying the Dreamliner. We don't have that plane-type to fly these markets. All we have are generic Intl a/c to run into the hubs of our Intl partners.
Reply
Old 06-27-2017 | 02:38 AM
  #70  
Gets Weekends Off
Veteran: Air Force
Line Holder
200 Countries Visited
 
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 3,361
Likes: 58
Default

Originally Posted by n9810f
We can't make $ on Intl because we refuse to acquire the right kind of fleet. Relying on the 763 to cross the Pacific isn't a recipe for success. And all we see are UA, AA and nearly every other Intl airline flying the Dreamliner. We don't have that plane-type to fly these markets. All we have are generic Intl a/c to run into the hubs of our Intl partners.
Kinda gettin' the ol' "Cousin Eddie RV" image in my mind as I picture our 763s rollin' in next to those 787s.

"Ohhh...the silent majesty of a winter's morn...clean, cool chill of a holiday air....and an a $$hole in a bathrobe emptying a chemical toilet into my sewer....."

"$hitter was full!!"
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Plane Ramrod
Spirit
29
03-15-2017 03:00 PM
DALFA
Delta
5
10-11-2016 07:01 AM
MD11FLYER
FedEx
22
01-11-2016 12:53 PM
FlyHigh423
Major
5
10-24-2009 03:58 PM
PeopleMover
Major
20
05-30-2008 05:28 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Your Privacy Choices