Airline Pilot Central Forums

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   Delta (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/delta/)
-   -   100 321 NEO Order (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/delta/109862-100-321-neo-order.html)

Tinpusher007 12-15-2017 12:24 PM


Originally Posted by Milk Man (Post 2484038)
What about the 330-800 NEO, says 257 seats with 7500 nm range.

It's a bit heavy. Shrinks always have CASM issues. The 787-8 is more efficient in this size class.

sailingfun 12-15-2017 12:33 PM


Originally Posted by Milk Man (Post 2484038)
What about the 330-800 NEO, says 257 seats with 7500 nm range.

It's not a very efficient airframe for 257 seats, I think they have sold like two. Nevertheless I think the 330-900 may end up the 767ER replacement for Delta.

Denny Crane 12-15-2017 04:41 PM


Originally Posted by Xray678 (Post 2483887)
Yes I was here when that happened. I thought it was a mistake to match the rates. Two thoughts, the ER rate was too low to begin with and that has never been addressed. Second, getting the rate to where it should be will be hard since the category flies far more 757 time than ER time. The ER rate is only $10 more than the 739, but $36 less than the 764. Do you really think it’s an appropriate wide body rate? IMHO it’s an appropriate rate for the 757, but the ER should pay $15-20 more.

I am not arguing about any of what you say above. As a matter of fact, if you reread my last sentence, you should have the answer to your question.

What I’m so tired of hearing is the FALSE claim that the 757, 762, and 763 were NOT brought up to the 7ER rate. Like you claimed. If you were here, you know that is patently a false claim and it detracts from any further argument you make.

If you were around for that, then you were around when 738 and 777 payrates were negotiated. If I remember correctly, we have United to thank for the rates negotiated at the time. I will agree we, as a union, have not done a good job of negotiating the 7er pay rate (among others like the M88).

Denny

Denny Crane 12-15-2017 04:43 PM


Originally Posted by TED74 (Post 2483966)
Can anyone point me to the table that shows what issues pilots are allowed to have an opinion on, as a function of their hire date?

We are not talking about an opinion here. We are talking about fact. So what you say above has no bearing on anything being discussed.

Edit: I should say the item being discussed is the very specific question as to whether the payrates for the 757, 763, & 763 were brought up to the 7ER rates. If you weren’t here, I get how you might not understand how it went down. Don’t blame the playa, blame the game.

Denny

BusCapt 12-15-2017 04:57 PM


Originally Posted by BobZ (Post 2482874)
So this aligns fleets for an acquistion i guess?

Hey...if wer stirring the pot lets really stir it!

Lax 321N opening on feb bid. Heard it here 1st. :)


Any reason LAX is not currently a 320 base?

Vincent Chase 12-15-2017 05:04 PM


Originally Posted by BusCapt (Post 2484248)
Any reason LAX is not currently a 320 base?

Networking says it doesn't need to be.

Next question?

TED74 12-15-2017 07:55 PM


Originally Posted by Denny Crane (Post 2484245)
We are not talking about an opinion here.

Not to get too particular, but you actually were talking about an opinion, and whether one was or wasn't "qualified to have one."

No biggie...I don't have an opinion, so worry not.

snowdawg 12-15-2017 09:17 PM


Originally Posted by Denny Crane (Post 2484242)
I am not arguing about any of what you say above. As a matter of fact, if you reread my last sentence, you should have the answer to your question.

What I’m so tired of hearing is the FALSE claim that the 757, 762, and 763 were NOT brought up to the 7ER rate. Like you claimed. If you were here, you know that is patently a false claim and it detracts from any further argument you make.

If you were around for that, then you were around when 738 and 777 payrates were negotiated. If I remember correctly, we have United to thank for the rates negotiated at the time. I will agree we, as a union, have not done a good job of negotiating the 7er pay rate (among others like the M88).

Denny

Almost. Company wanted 777 really bad, and union said $300 per hour. Company laughed, a year later we signed 777 at 300 an hour. Then UAL took that number and applied it to their 1999 contract all the way down to their 737. We in turn for contract 2k asked for UAL +1% and we got it. Contract 2000 UAL +1% was with Malone.

Denny Crane 12-15-2017 10:48 PM


Originally Posted by TED74 (Post 2484326)
Not to get too particular, but you actually were talking about an opinion, and whether one was or wasn't "qualified to have one."

No biggie...I don't have an opinion, so worry not.

No, it’s not an opinion. What don’t you get? It is a fact that the payrates for the 757, 762, and 763 were raised to the payrate of the 7ER. It really is as simple as that.

Do you think when the payrates were harmonized into one that the 7ER rate was lowered? Rhetorical question. It wasn’t. Tell me, where is there a chance for an opinion here? I don’t see it.

Denny

Edit: Whoops, I did say “opinion” in my previous post. What I really meant was if you weren’t here and living thru it, you probably don’t know what happened (and probably didn’t care) in as great a depth as someone who was an active pilot on the list then.

Denny Crane 12-15-2017 10:50 PM


Originally Posted by snowdawg (Post 2484337)
Almost. Company wanted 777 really bad, and union said $300 per hour. Company laughed, a year later we signed 777 at 300 an hour. Then UAL took that number and applied it to their 1999 contract all the way down to their 737. We in turn for contract 2k asked for UAL +1% and we got it. Contract 2000 UAL +1% was with Malone.

Thanks for the reminder.

Denny


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:03 AM.


Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands