Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
Short Call QOL Improvement >

Short Call QOL Improvement

Search

Notices

Short Call QOL Improvement

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 10-27-2018 | 07:34 AM
  #81  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 20,871
Likes: 189
Default

I think the point was you never have a good thing to say. It’s always negative to a extreme.
Reply
Old 10-27-2018 | 07:41 AM
  #82  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 1,015
Likes: 13
Default

Originally Posted by notEnuf
This is a productivity and efficiency move. Reserves were essentially useless to them after 9 hours and now more of the 24 hour day is able to be useful on SC. 9hr SC, 10hrs rest, and then back to SC. That's a 3 hour gain in SC usability. I rarely do all 7 SCs in a month. I think that will now change. That would result in fewer reserves required.

Nobody thinks this is an intentional effort to attack QOL,. But, this is an intentional effort the find additional efficiency and productivity within the contract (as they always do.) However, any change which results in productivity means an equal reduction in (increased SCs and flying affecting the good deal reserve) QOL.


I’ll say it again. They can do this today. It happens to me. I get released early from SC for an earlier short call the next day or a trip the next day. Nobody has come up with a single scenario that a 9 hour SC lets them do that they aren’t already doing. If they wanted more guys on SC every day they don’t have to go from 12 to 9 hours, they could just have more on 12 hour SC.

I get it, their reasoning seems weird. It might just be 5% usage, but they are giving it up for no apparent reason other than to be nice. I see why people don’t trust it. But there is no concrete way that this helps scheduling.
Reply
Old 10-27-2018 | 07:48 AM
  #83  
notEnuf's Avatar
Racketeer
 
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 13,242
Likes: 702
From: N60.4858 W149.9327
Default

Originally Posted by bugman61
I’ll say it again. They can do this today. It happens to me. I get released early from SC for an earlier short call the next day or a trip the next day. Nobody has come up with a single scenario that a 9 hour SC lets them do that they aren’t already doing. If they wanted more guys on SC every day they don’t have to go from 12 to 9 hours, they could just have more on 12 hour SC.

I get it, their reasoning seems weird. It might just be 5% usage, but they are giving it up for no apparent reason other than to be nice. I see why people don’t trust it. But there is no concrete way that this helps scheduling.
They are giving up the 5% because they don't need it and they will use more or all of the 7 SCs now. This reduces the number of reserves required and deploys them back into the first 9 hours sooner, gaining productivity. Yes they CAN do this now but don't as a policy. Doing it all the time as policy creates more efficiency.
Reply
Old 10-27-2018 | 07:53 AM
  #84  
Line Holder
 
Joined: May 2009
Posts: 481
Likes: 5
Default

This whole thread is fatiguing.
Reply
Old 10-27-2018 | 07:56 AM
  #85  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 1,015
Likes: 13
Default

Originally Posted by notEnuf
They are giving up the 5% because they don't need it and they will use more or all of the 7 SCs now. This reduces the number of reserves required and deploys them back into the first 9 hours sooner, gaining productivity. Yes they CAN do this now but don't as a policy. Doing it all the time as policy creates more efficiency.


If most categories don’t max out on SC, and they need more, then why don’t they just assign more 12 hour SC?
Reply
Old 10-27-2018 | 08:28 AM
  #86  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 235
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by bugman61
I see why people don’t trust it. But there is no concrete way that this helps scheduling.
They're not paying a scheduler to answer the "please sir, may I be released early" phone calls. After 8 pages that's the only thing the comapny is getting that I can see.
Reply
Old 10-27-2018 | 08:36 AM
  #87  
RonRicco's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 833
Likes: 5
From: Captain
Default

Originally Posted by notEnuf
They are giving up the 5% because they don't need it and they will use more or all of the 7 SCs now. This reduces the number of reserves required and deploys them back into the first 9 hours sooner, gaining productivity. Yes they CAN do this now but don't as a policy. Doing it all the time as policy creates more efficiency.
I hope you will present a resolution at your next council meeting supporting a move to make 12 hour SC mandatory.
Reply
Old 10-27-2018 | 08:39 AM
  #88  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 235
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by TED74
The ipad has made me more efficient and productive. I want the Surface back!
Attached Images
File Type: jpg
dey-tuk-ar-split-screen.jpg (87.9 KB, 219 views)
Reply
Old 10-27-2018 | 08:43 AM
  #89  
notEnuf's Avatar
Racketeer
 
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 13,242
Likes: 702
From: N60.4858 W149.9327
Default

Originally Posted by RonRicco
I hope you will present a resolution at your next council meeting supporting a move to make 12 hour SC mandatory.
Because the last 3 hours are statistically useless. This will result in fewer reserves required because they are more useful and productivite. (fly more, not just saved for emergencies)

This will shift us to a more short call based system. Delta’s long call is an anomaly in reserve systems. And much less efficient.
Reply
Old 10-27-2018 | 09:03 AM
  #90  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 1,015
Likes: 13
Default

Originally Posted by notEnuf
Because the last 3 hours are statistically useless. This will result in fewer reserves required because they are more useful and productivite. (fly more, not just saved for emergencies)



This will shift us to a more short call based system. Delta’s long call is an anomaly in reserve systems. And much less efficient.


Just because you keep repeating this doesn’t make it true. They can assign more SC today. And they don’t do it.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Martin404
United
476
04-07-2018 03:24 PM
hawgdriver
American
8
03-05-2017 11:45 AM
mispoken
Delta
6
10-30-2016 05:26 PM
Clearedtopush
Delta
241
07-27-2016 06:10 PM
baseball
United
20
10-26-2015 08:47 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices