|
Originally Posted by Meow1215
(Post 2872356)
Their own metal, is Delta's metal. Hate to break the news to you.
|
Originally Posted by Cogf16
(Post 2872260)
SIAP, but talked to a recent retiree and he was really upset about this (change?) that puts Endeavor guys ahead of our retiree's. I wholeheartedly agree. I say we put this high on our list for the contract. Not right.
|
Originally Posted by Meow1215
(Post 2872356)
Their own metal, is Delta's metal. Hate to break the news to you.
|
Originally Posted by 20Fathoms
(Post 2872362)
True but mainline is not their metal. Let me ask you this: Should compass, GoJet, Republic, and Skywest all go ahead of our retirees for vacation travel? Or just you guys? Our retirees gave a lot for this profession.
|
Originally Posted by 20Fathoms
(Post 2872362)
True but mainline is not their metal. Let me ask you this: Should compass, GoJet, Republic, and Skywest all go ahead of our retirees for vacation travel? Or just you guys? Our retirees gave a lot for this profession.
|
Originally Posted by ChecklistMonkey
(Post 2872364)
Gave a lot, like scope? Haha. Sorry. I couldn't help myself.
|
Originally Posted by 20Fathoms
(Post 2872362)
True but mainline is not their metal. Let me ask you this: Should compass, GoJet, Republic, and Skywest all go ahead of our retirees for vacation travel? Or just you guys? Our retirees gave a lot for this profession.
|
Totally don’t buy the “Endeavor employee NON-REVVING to work” argument. In that case, an Endeavor employee non-revving to WORK should have priority over an S2, right?
The jumpseat is for commuting. Non-reving is a benefit of employment (active or retired). Not eligible for the jumpseat? Then commuting to work at Endeavor is dicey career choice. Got bumped from the jumpseat? Commuter clause. Endeavor is a wholly owned. They are not Delta employees. Their benefits should not undermine Delta employee benefits (active or retired). I’m almost convinced this is a false flag move to force us to expend negotiating capital on a benefit we already had. Signed, Former ASA Mainline Pilot |
Originally Posted by Speed Select
(Post 2872370)
Totally don’t buy the “Endeavor employee NON-REVVING to work” argument. In that case, an Endeavor employee non-revving to WORK should have priority over an S2, right?
The jumpseat is for commuting. Non-reving is a benefit of employment (active or retired). Not eligible for the jumpseat? Then commuting to work at Endeavor is dicey career choice. Got bumped from the jumpseat? Commuter clause. Endeavor is a wholly owned. They are not Delta employees. Their benefits should not undermine Delta employee benefits (active or retired). I’m almost convinced this is a false flag move to force us to expend negotiating capital on a benefit we already had. |
Originally Posted by Speed Select
(Post 2872370)
Totally don’t buy the “Endeavor employee NON-REVVING to work” argument. In that case, an Endeavor employee non-revving to WORK should have priority over an S2, right?
The jumpseat is for commuting. Non-reving is a benefit of employment (active or retired). Not eligible for the jumpseat? Then commuting to work at Endeavor is dicey career choice. Got bumped from the jumpseat? Commuter clause. So only 1-2 people per flight can commute to work? lol |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:57 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands