Delta To Furlough?
03-01-2020 | 04:01 PM
#71
Line Holder
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 1,140
Likes: 155
A question,
If children under 15 are less likely to either A. contract the illness, or B. have symptoms so mild as to avoid diagnosis, does it mean they are not a carrier?
I mean this as an honest question. If they can have the virus and be a carrier while showing no/minimum symptoms could this be even more problematic?
I do not know enough about how this spreads to have even a moderately intelligent understanding of the risks.
If children under 15 are less likely to either A. contract the illness, or B. have symptoms so mild as to avoid diagnosis, does it mean they are not a carrier?
I mean this as an honest question. If they can have the virus and be a carrier while showing no/minimum symptoms could this be even more problematic?
I do not know enough about how this spreads to have even a moderately intelligent understanding of the risks.
03-01-2020 | 04:13 PM
#72
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 5,131
Likes: 92
03-01-2020 | 04:14 PM
#73
Banned
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 1,317
Likes: 0
From: The Beginnings
Interesting, I just saw that.
As a practical matter, if (!) crews have to "self quarantine" for 2 weeks after returning from either China or Italy, that would explain why flights are no longer feasible, even if the chances for contagion are slight.
As a practical matter, if (!) crews have to "self quarantine" for 2 weeks after returning from either China or Italy, that would explain why flights are no longer feasible, even if the chances for contagion are slight.
03-01-2020 | 04:18 PM
#74
Line Holder
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 1,140
Likes: 155
03-01-2020 | 04:42 PM
#75
Banned
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 2,012
Likes: 0
A question,
If children under 15 are less likely to either A. contract the illness, or B. have symptoms so mild as to avoid diagnosis, does it mean they are not a carrier?
I mean this as an honest question. If they can have the virus and be a carrier while showing no/minimum symptoms could this be even more problematic?
I do not know enough about how this spreads to have even a moderately intelligent understanding of the risks.
If children under 15 are less likely to either A. contract the illness, or B. have symptoms so mild as to avoid diagnosis, does it mean they are not a carrier?
I mean this as an honest question. If they can have the virus and be a carrier while showing no/minimum symptoms could this be even more problematic?
I do not know enough about how this spreads to have even a moderately intelligent understanding of the risks.
1) get the virus
2) spread the virus
3) have minimal symptoms (cough/sneeze a little for a day)
03-01-2020 | 04:46 PM
#76
Roll’n Thunder
Joined: Oct 2009
Posts: 5,130
Likes: 549
From: Pilot
03-01-2020 | 05:19 PM
#77
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 12,484
Likes: 1,060
03-01-2020 | 05:38 PM
#78
Banned
Joined: May 2017
Posts: 2,012
Likes: 0
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
