Search

Notices

MEC Early Out Comm

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-12-2020 | 12:35 PM
  #11  
JamesBond's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 7,292
Likes: 0
From: A350 Both
Default

Originally Posted by dynap09
Early outs save the company money by saving costs for some of the most expensive pilots flying (max seniority / max benefits / max healthcare costs etc).

When you talk about doing training events for 60 year olds, not that many are going to be bumped to have to learn a potentially whole new airplane or plane type that they may not actually fly for very long. The young guys like moving around a ton, some older pilots have families, grandkids etc, may not want to commute or relocate to a new base.

Early out is a win win option - it's going to happen - why wouldn't it? Seriously what is the argument against it?

Keep it voluntary - it doesn't have to be a great option, and pilots don't have to take it if the option isn't good.
Wanna bet?
Reply
Old 05-12-2020 | 12:40 PM
  #12  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 4,116
Likes: 1
Default

You arent an airline pilot without a dee-vorce...a bankruptcy...a merger...AND sli integration...and another bankruptcy just to make sure.
Reply
Old 05-12-2020 | 12:59 PM
  #13  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2008
Posts: 329
Likes: 0
Default

Most of us senior north guys have flow Boeing and the bus. We also have commuted mostly are whole career. So it’s not that big of a deal to keep flying for high pay, full vacation, use personal drops. Whatever. It would have to be a Considerable lump some or at least 55 hours a month guarantee plus a way back to the seniority list if Delta goes bankrupt. But that’s me bird in the hand. I can’t speak for delta South guys.
Reply
Old 05-12-2020 | 01:07 PM
  #14  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Aug 2006
Posts: 1,465
Likes: 0
From: A330 First Officer
Default

With the displacement bid on the horizon this week, I don't think that there will be an ERP put out before then.
Reply
Old 05-12-2020 | 01:10 PM
  #15  
Tailhookah's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 794
Likes: 2
From: Widget Jet
Default

I fly w/ a lot of those top of the list A guys. From what I’ve heard, a lot of them have said they would take a AA style SIL buyout in a heartbeat. Don’t forget that they all have either a frozen pension or a PBGC retirement as well... the guys who I’ve had this conversation with all have friends who feel the same way. So at least in the big categories, I bet there’s more that would take it than you think.
Reply
Old 05-12-2020 | 01:13 PM
  #16  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 2,960
Likes: 0
From: Power top
Default

Originally Posted by Aviator147
because they’ll be displaced? Have to go to training in their last year or 2 on a new plane? I’d bet there’s incentive for some to tap out.
Maybe, but the PBGC monthly benefit at 63 is roughly 20% of ALV on the A330. What would the average pilot do?
Reply
Old 05-12-2020 | 01:28 PM
  #17  
FangsF15's Avatar
Moderator
 
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 8,219
Likes: 1,177
Default

Excellent Comm Piece. Logically lays out all the many ways ignoring the union will cost the company big money and flexibility. Which is the MEC's strategy, I think.

The company seems poised to, once again, inexplicably thumb their nose at their most important partner's good suggestions, and publish a MOAD without the obvious churn-mitigation of a Pilot specific ERP. I suspect APLA knows/suspects the pending one-size-fits-all ERP will be so underwhelming to the pilot group that virtually no takers will bite, and will once again pit us vs. the rest of the employees in an attempt to extract more from us, and stupidly care more about keeping a FA union off property than save real money.

Wait for it, the MOAD will look more like UA than AA, and the ERP will be a nothing burger for us (and the noncons will cheer wildly...). The MEC is prepping the battlefield for the after party. I hope I'm wrong.
Reply
Old 05-12-2020 | 01:36 PM
  #18  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 20,869
Likes: 187
Default

Originally Posted by Tailhookah
I fly w/ a lot of those top of the list A guys. From what I’ve heard, a lot of them have said they would take a AA style SIL buyout in a heartbeat. Don’t forget that they all have either a frozen pension or a PBGC retirement as well... the guys who I’ve had this conversation with all have friends who feel the same way. So at least in the big categories, I bet there’s more that would take it than you think.
The NWA plan is frozen and the value does not increase with age. That is why they felt in the SLI negotiations that most NWA pilots would retire at 60. The PBGC payment goes up substantially every year you don’t take it so waiting to 65 is a no brainer. In the end however I understand the average retirement ages both North and South are almost identical. I think any plan is not going to have a huge number of takers. I am hearing rumors about a company wide plan which would be offered to pilots being 1 week of pay for each year of service up to 32 weeks in a lump. I really can’t see the company paying lumps out at the moment but the source was good. If true and I am skeptical the devil would be defining a weeks pay. Would it be based off FAE or 80 hours a month. Big difference for some.
Reply
Old 05-12-2020 | 01:42 PM
  #19  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 2,960
Likes: 0
From: Power top
Default

Originally Posted by sailingfun
The NWA plan is frozen and the value does not increase with age. That is why they felt in the SLI negotiations that most NWA pilots would retire at 60. The PBGC payment goes up substantially every year you don’t take it so waiting to 65 is a no brainer. In the end however I understand the average retirement ages both North and South are almost identical. I think any plan is not going to have a huge number of takers. I am hearing rumors about a company wide plan which would be offered to pilots being 1 week of pay for each year of service up to 32 weeks in a lump. I really can’t see the company paying lumps out at the moment but the source was good. If true and I am skeptical the devil would be defining a weeks pay. Would it be based off FAE or 80 hours a month. Big difference for some.
Heard same. Sils and the ERP aren't worth the value of negotiating with multiple unions 5 years down the road.
Reply
Old 05-12-2020 | 01:50 PM
  #20  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 4,116
Likes: 1
Default

No early out pkg until we agree on size of pay cut.

Its gona look like contract 96 and the pre 72 escape hatch that closed with signing.

50hrs at current pay rates will look dang good after we take a 30% cut
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
newKnow
Delta
80
08-23-2015 11:10 PM
TANSTAAFL
Major
728
10-30-2013 01:18 PM
Redundant Guy
Regional
201
01-28-2013 07:06 AM
Pinchanickled
Regional
33
12-17-2010 06:58 PM
Redeye Pilot
United
113
11-07-2010 01:31 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices