![]() |
Originally Posted by GucciBoy
(Post 3134646)
Thanks for the tip, Ed. [emoji106]
|
Originally Posted by jmcharles
(Post 3134633)
This^^^
ALPA (our reps and us) need to come to terms with the reality that there is not enough flying to go around. And at the same time come to terms with the reality that furloughs need not be the “industry standard” in a crisis. Life is not black and white and there is always a middle gray. Go into the room, lock the door, and don’t come out until there’s something worth voting on. The end. I’m sure many here would like to see the optimizer reigned in, give us better trip mixes (more day turns in bases with lots who live locally, more commutable 3-5 day trips in bases like NYC) , and have better DHD accommodations. Hopefully both sides can be reasonable, but I don’t expect ALPA to play ball if DL is going to try to turn a negotiation into a demand list. |
Originally Posted by Jaww
(Post 3134666)
Yes to all. They were all agreed upon.
More to consider than the pilot group? You mean union busting or union preventing? Please clarify. |
Originally Posted by Gone Flying
(Post 3134671)
while I can agree with you in principle, I think this management team has done quite a bit of damage to pilots willingness to work together. While I really hope a deal does come through, it needs to be a deal that offers something to the pilot group other than no furloughs to pass MEMRAT. Given the number of EOs and the voluntary measures the hours cuts would probably not have to be that drastic. An 7-8 hour cut to the bottom or our TLV of 75 hours would probably generate more savings than furloughing due to the fact that those in the furlough range are much cheaper employees. (rumor is AA only asked for 8 hr reduction to save all 1605 furloughs there)
I’m sure many here would like to see the optimizer reigned in, give us better trip mixes (more day turns in bases with lots who live locally, more commutable 3-5 day trips in bases like NYC) , and have better DHD accommodations. Hopefully both sides can be reasonable, but I don’t expect ALPA to play ball if DL is going to try to turn a negotiation into a demand list. |
Originally Posted by jmcharles
(Post 3134665)
You don’t trust them because they didn’t offer SILs, after they explicitly stated it may or may not be offered at their discretion? You don’t trust them because they have more than just the pilot group to represent? You don’t trust them because they’ve had the AUDACITY to admit to you that they can’t keep all of us flying at contractual levels in the current revenue environment? Why don’t you stop thinking diabolically for one second and realize we are just one piece in this puzzle. We either fit or we get reshuffled until we do.
So I ask you, why do YOU think the pilot group went almost universally from “work less, but not for less” to FPTTLD overnight? |
Originally Posted by jmcharles
(Post 3134675)
Thanks. Some good points.
#240SUX |
Originally Posted by jmcharles
(Post 3134665)
You don’t trust them because they didn’t offer SILs, after they explicitly stated it may or may not be offered at their discretion? You don’t trust them because they have more than just the pilot group to represent? You don’t trust them because they’ve had the AUDACITY to admit to you that they can’t keep all of us flying at contractual levels in the current revenue environment? Why don’t you stop thinking diabolically for one second and realize we are just one piece in this puzzle. We either fit or we get reshuffled until we do.
I don't trust them because I was told "Do it once do it right" and voted for a 32% paycut to avoid BK. The company knew we were going into BK and misled us. As a reward for our magnanimous behavior The company then took us to court for further cuts. I don't trust them because they made almost zero effort to negotiate in good faith last fall. I don't trust them because they resorted to public shaming of the Pilot group via the media last spring. I don't trust them because after benefiting from the April re-bid they reneged. While within the letter of their agreement, it was clearly not within the Spirit of the agreement. I don't trust them because they continually violate Scope when it is in their best interest. Is DALPA perfect? Far from it, and union Politics definitely plays into all of this. It would be great if we could reach a win-win with the company that would help the furloughs. Do not however fool yourself one bit - the company is unsure of furloughs because no one knows this ends and how quick the recovery would be - but if it would benefit the companies bottom line we would furlough in a heartbeat. I do not begrudge the company for this at all - if we are flying at a 9000 pilot required level it would be foolish to carry addiitonal Pilots for any extended time. Bottom line - If we do not furlough it will be because it benefits the company. I hope we can come to a win-win deal with the company but if we don't the blame primarily rests with our management. This distrust of management is a learned behavior, the company through their actions has lost the trust of the Pilots. Scoop |
Originally Posted by scoop
(Post 3134686)
there are plenty of valid reasons not to trust our management team:
I don't trust them because i was told "do it once do it right" and voted for a 32% paycut to avoid bk. The company knew we were going into bk and misled us. As a reward for our magnanimous behavior the company then took us to court for further cuts. I don't trust them because they made almost zero effort to negotiate in good faith last fall. I don't trust them because they resorted to public shaming of the pilot group via the media last spring. I don't trust them because after benefiting from the april re-bid they reneged. While within the letter of their agreement, it was clearly not within the spirit of the agreement. I don't trust them because they continually violate scope when it is in their best interest. Is dalpa perfect? Far from it, and union politics definitely plays into all of this. It would be great if we could reach a win-win with the company that would help the furloughs. Do not however fool yourself one bit - the company is unsure of furloughs because no one knows this ends and how quick the recovery would be - but if it would benefit the companies bottom line we would furlough in a heartbeat. I do not begrudge the company for this at all - if we are flying at a 9000 pilot required level it would be foolish to carry addiitonal pilots for any extended time. Bottom line - if we do not furlough it will be because it benefits the company. I hope we can come to a win-win deal with the company but if we don't the blame primarily rests with our management. This distrust of management is a learned behavior, the company through their actions has lost the trust of the pilots. Scoop |
Originally Posted by FangsF15
(Post 3134681)
Senator McCarthy was right about communists in the State Department, but it was how he went about dealing with it that made him notorious even today...
So I ask you, why do YOU think the pilot group went almost universally from “work less, but not for less” to FPTTLD overnight? Is it possible you are mistaken re the "universally"? When I see the vote at UAL I will have more data instead of an emotional argument. If they turn down their LOA 90-10, I will admit that you handicapped the will of the Delta pilot group successfully. If their LOA passes then let's revisit this and what "universally" means. Deal? |
Originally Posted by Buck Rogers
(Post 3134690)
Is it possible you are mistaken re the "universally"? When I see the vote at UAL I will have more data instead of an emotional argument. If they turn down their LOA 90-10, I will admit that you handicapped the will of the Delta pilot group successfully. If their LOA passes then let's revisit this and what "universally" means. Deal?
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:47 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands