1721
#71
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Sep 2014
Posts: 5,130
Likes: 92
Honestly, I'd actually respect that business decision... in absence of the public proclamations they've made about wanting to avoid them. They can't have it both ways, making commitments to avoid furloughs while choosing to furlough because it helps near-term cash flow.
I didn't say they could potentially avoid all involuntary furloughs, they did. I didn't say they'd exhaust voluntary options, they did. I didn't say they would be creative, they did.
I've said I'll work less, not for less. There are plenty of pilots willing to help management avoid furloughs, but it's not a blank check for them to cash in on this crisis to achieve their contractual gains for the next decade or two.
We all lost a week of vacation 15 years ago. Did that ever come back during years of $Billions in profits? Nope. It was a gateway item for management... wouldn't even entertain the thought.
I didn't say they could potentially avoid all involuntary furloughs, they did. I didn't say they'd exhaust voluntary options, they did. I didn't say they would be creative, they did.
I've said I'll work less, not for less. There are plenty of pilots willing to help management avoid furloughs, but it's not a blank check for them to cash in on this crisis to achieve their contractual gains for the next decade or two.
We all lost a week of vacation 15 years ago. Did that ever come back during years of $Billions in profits? Nope. It was a gateway item for management... wouldn't even entertain the thought.
#72
Even if they kept the same number of days on call the amount of actually flying a reserve could contractually be used would be reduced by the ALV reduction. With the planned staffing levels reserve utilization is not going to be high and given pilot posts here and in reality, line holders will be picking up a lot of open time further reducing reserve utilization.
I have seen nothing however that indicates we could not negotiate a reduction in on call days with a ALV reduction. As this evolves what your going to start hearing more and more often is this. “Damn, I wasn’t senior enough to hold reserve next month”
I have seen nothing however that indicates we could not negotiate a reduction in on call days with a ALV reduction. As this evolves what your going to start hearing more and more often is this. “Damn, I wasn’t senior enough to hold reserve next month”
#73
Unfortunately, this sums it up perfectly. I wasn't around for the past, but I'm familiar with it. I was however here to see the SIL's promised and subsequently yanked away so I fully understand the distrust. This is not a problem of pilot's unwilling to negotiate. This is a problem that management created a long time ago. They planted the seed of distrust, and now it's grown into a massive tree that they're trying to pretend doesn't exist. It's very difficult to come back from that...That whole 'fool me once thing.'
#74
I am not sure why people keep saying they want to slash widebody ALV’s. With the elimination of the 777 category and the VEOP retirements they are short and have a lot of training to do for both the A350 and A330 on the Captains side. The A350 next summer will fully utilize every airframe. The 330 is projected for high utilization. ALV’s will be high for both. The manning on the widebodies is solved, the only problem is getting more widebody pilots trained.
#75
On Reserve
Joined: Jan 2014
Posts: 121
Likes: 1
Furloughing is the best business move and the best for the stock price with the limited information I've got as an internet troll. Additionally, do they want to set the precedent that anytime a black swan event occurs, extraordinary efforts will be made to avoid furloughing people?
#76
I am not sure why people keep saying they want to slash widebody ALV’s. With the elimination of the 777 category and the VEOP retirements they are short and have a lot of training to do for both the A350 and A330 on the Captains side. The A350 next summer will fully utilize every airframe. The 330 is projected for high utilization. ALV’s will be high for both. The manning on the widebodies is solved, the only problem is getting more widebody pilots trained.
Denny
#77
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 20,869
Likes: 188
‘Well SEA330A certainly isn’t undermanned for September/October...... One three day trip leaving 30 Sept in open time thru end of October as of last night. I suspect it’s that way in all 330A categories. When is the 330A supposed to be short? Didn’t I read somewhere we still have half our 330’s parked and there are three -900 for us sitting on the ramp at Airbus?
Denny
Denny
P.S. Take a look at NYC and ATL open time. Traditionally there is little to no 330 open time in the fall.
Last edited by sailingfun; 09-18-2020 at 07:54 AM.
#78
On Reserve
Joined: Apr 2015
Posts: 17
Likes: 0
I am not sure why people keep saying they want to slash widebody ALV’s. With the elimination of the 777 category and the VEOP retirements they are short and have a lot of training to do for both the A350 and A330 on the Captains side. The A350 next summer will fully utilize every airframe. The 330 is projected for high utilization. ALV’s will be high for both. The manning on the widebodies is solved, the only problem is getting more widebody pilots trained.
#79
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 20,869
Likes: 188
They filled 300 positions just for 330/350 Captains in the AE. Probably another 40 765 CA’s also awarded. That is not counting reinstatement’s. That does make much sense if they need a big ALV downward adjustment. It also is probably the max they can train on a short AE contrary to your statement even though not all awards require training. I understand they will be purchasing off sight simulator time to complete the 350 training from the bid.


