Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
Restart of Contract Negotiations >

Restart of Contract Negotiations

Search
Notices

Restart of Contract Negotiations

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 04-21-2021, 08:36 AM
  #1  
Gets Weekends Off
Thread Starter
 
Joined APC: May 2012
Posts: 1,126
Default Restart of Contract Negotiations

Originally Posted by TED74 View Post
I'm just one pilot, but if they want to restructure TOE on that fleet, I'll trade the current methodology for what they want (theater qual / okay to fly domestic prior to TOE). In exchange, I'll take 5:15 for training and vacation. Easy peasy.
Several comments about how TOE is worth ‘so much more than that’. Tell me how, if you are NB, 330, or 350 how this is worth so much more than that. My guess is, if put to MEMRAT, 5:15 for training/vacation would pass easily.
waldo135 is offline  
Old 04-21-2021, 01:17 PM
  #2  
Super Moderator
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: DAL 330
Posts: 6,868
Default

Originally Posted by tcco94 View Post
So what's the solution for this? Will ALPA allow Atlantic crossings for TOE or was that the proposal that we are talking about above
Maybe DALPA should just say - Sure we can address it in section 6, possibly giving the company some incentive not to drag this out for years.

Scoop
Scoop is offline  
Old 04-21-2021, 02:00 PM
  #3  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2012
Posts: 1,418
Default

Originally Posted by Scoop View Post
Maybe DALPA should just say - Sure we can address it in section 6, possibly giving the company some incentive not to drag this out for years.

Scoop
Agreed. Address it in full section 6 like everything else. It’s a problem of their own creation that they want us to solve and pay for.

I’m not sure why so many are all on board to waive training requirements to help the company.
ERflyer is offline  
Old 04-21-2021, 02:19 PM
  #4  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Sep 2014
Posts: 4,909
Default

Originally Posted by ERflyer View Post

I’m not sure why so many are all on board to waive training requirements to help the company.
Who are these many people wanting to help the company? Leverage has no value if you don’t leverage it. The company has a need that we can fix in a way that we could gain far more than we lose. If they don’t want to pay what it’s worth to change TOE, they can pound sand.

Personally, I don’t think now is a good time to reengage fully in Section 6. But I’m happy to lock 5:15 in for 12 thousand of us who all have vacation and training right meow.
TED74 is offline  
Old 04-21-2021, 02:28 PM
  #5  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Jul 2010
Posts: 3,202
Default

Originally Posted by TED74 View Post
Who are these many people wanting to help the company? Leverage has no value if you don’t leverage it. The company has a need that we can fix in a way that we could gain far more than we lose. If they don’t want to pay what it’s worth to change TOE, they can pound sand.

Personally, I don’t think now is a good time to reengage fully in Section 6. But I’m happy to lock 5:15 in for 12 thousand of us who all have vacation and training right meow.
I can see leverage now with the increase of flying and need for new people. We should focus on QOL items and things like the 5:15, more vacation, more PS, PS for commuting, better reserve rules, better retirement, health insurance rules and pay raises accordingly with the recovery.
PilotJ3 is offline  
Old 04-21-2021, 02:31 PM
  #6  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: May 2012
Posts: 1,418
Default

Originally Posted by TED74 View Post
Who are these many people wanting to help the company? Leverage has no value if you don’t leverage it. The company has a need that we can fix in a way that we could gain far more than we lose. If they don’t want to pay what it’s worth to change TOE, they can pound sand.

Personally, I don’t think now is a good time to reengage fully in Section 6. But I’m happy to lock 5:15 in for 12 thousand of us who all have vacation and training right meow.
Originally Posted by PilotJ3 View Post
I can see leverage now with the increase of flying and need for new people. We should focus on QOL items and things like the 5:15, more vacation, more PS, PS for commuting, better reserve rules, better retirement, health insurance rules and pay raises accordingly with the recovery.
As Tunes mentioned above, the company proposal was rejected by the MEC 17-0. It doesn’t seem they want an even trade.

You should fill out the negotiations survey, like everyone else, when it comes out again for such a sweeping change.
ERflyer is offline  
Old 04-21-2021, 03:26 PM
  #7  
Super Moderator
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: DAL 330
Posts: 6,868
Default

Originally Posted by PilotJ3 View Post
I can see leverage now with the increase of flying and need for new people. We should focus on QOL items and things like the 5:15, more vacation, more PS, PS for commuting, better reserve rules, better retirement, health insurance rules and pay raises accordingly with the recovery.

Absolutely - in other words section 6. Its been two years without a raise or major QOL improvements - I am sure the company wouldn't mind stretching this to 5-6 years. Now is not the time for LOAs.

Scoop
Scoop is offline  
Old 04-21-2021, 03:31 PM
  #8  
Super Moderator
 
Joined APC: Dec 2007
Position: DAL 330
Posts: 6,868
Default

Originally Posted by TED74 View Post
Who are these many people wanting to help the company? Leverage has no value if you don’t leverage it. The company has a need that we can fix in a way that we could gain far more than we lose. If they don’t want to pay what it’s worth to change TOE, they can pound sand.

Personally, I don’t think now is a good time to reengage fully in Section 6. But I’m happy to lock 5:15 in for 12 thousand of us who all have vacation and training right meow.

I don't necessarily disagree with you but I will offer the following question:

Would 12 thousand of us benefit more from leveraging the TOE issue into 5:15 or using it motivate the company to actually negotiate in good faith vice giving us the Heisman via the RLA as usual?

I don't know the answer but it sure would be nice to have the company actually interested in negotiating.

Scoop
Scoop is offline  
Old 04-21-2021, 04:17 PM
  #9  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined APC: Feb 2008
Posts: 19,273
Default

Originally Posted by Scoop View Post
I don't necessarily disagree with you but I will offer the following question:

Would 12 thousand of us benefit more from leveraging the TOE issue into 5:15 or using it motivate the company to actually negotiate in good faith vice giving us the Heisman via the RLA as usual?

I don't know the answer but it sure would be nice to have the company actually interested in negotiating.

Scoop
The cost savings to the company by making it a theater qual is not going to be all that great. Most pilots will end up getting the qual because they would love to fly the trips. The company gains some productivity by being able to use a pilot sooner after completing IOE. They lose some cash as greenslips would increase if most reserves lack the qual. In the end your not going to leverage a 5 million cost savings into 50 million in other improvements. We have tried that before with no success. The request by the company to allow a increase in the ALV on the MD88 for two months is a good example. Our demands just ended up screwing a lot of pilots in or scheduled for training at the time.
Once the company gets rid of the IOE backlog there would be no real savings at all. Given the rumblings that the glacial pace of vaccinations is going to kill Europe for the summer and the projected flying is going to be adjusted down they might not even care at this point.
sailingfun is offline  
Old 04-21-2021, 04:39 PM
  #10  
On Reserve
 
Joined APC: Jan 2017
Posts: 18
Default

Originally Posted by sailingfun View Post
The cost savings to the company by making it a theater qual is not going to be all that great. Most pilots will end up getting the qual because they would love to fly the trips. The company gains some productivity by being able to use a pilot sooner after completing IOE. They lose some cash as greenslips would increase if most reserves lack the qual. In the end your not going to leverage a 5 million cost savings into 50 million in other improvements. We have tried that before with no success. The request by the company to allow a increase in the ALV on the MD88 for two months is a good example. Our demands just ended up screwing a lot of pilots in or scheduled for training at the time.
Once the company gets rid of the IOE backlog there would be no real savings at all. Given the rumblings that the glacial pace of vaccinations is going to kill Europe for the summer and the projected flying is going to be adjusted down they might not even care at this point.
wouldn’t the lack of flying to Europe make the matter even worse? There would be very little TOE opportunities and a lot of new pilots needing it.
rambodog is online now  
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
nwa757
American
178
01-10-2015 10:54 AM
tallplt
Major
28
06-17-2012 10:23 AM
Bill Lumberg
Major
71
06-02-2012 07:28 AM
jet320
Hiring News
4
06-12-2008 07:12 AM
Freighter Captain
Atlas/Polar
3
08-03-2005 03:19 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices