Search

Notices

United AIP TA

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 07-02-2022 | 02:31 AM
  #641  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Apr 2014
Posts: 1,142
Likes: 5
Default

Originally Posted by FangsF15
You aren't the only one. As others have also said, the first 16% of any 'raise' only gets us back to break even with C15. If we don't see something well into the 20's DOS, I'm a no along with I'd bet 69+% of the rest of us. My apologies for assuming this was your last contract. Maybe second to last?
Agreed. Yes, second to last.
Reply
Old 07-02-2022 | 04:48 AM
  #642  
notEnuf's Avatar
Racketeer
 
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 13,364
Likes: 846
From: N60.4858 W149.9327
Default

Industry managers are racing to drop turds faster than a goat with IBS. They know something and want the contracts locked up. I'm happily waiting for the Q2 call and '23 projections.
Reply
Old 07-02-2022 | 05:02 AM
  #643  
Banned
 
Joined: May 2022
Posts: 411
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by 3 green
Agreed. Yes, second to last.
Are you sure about that? Remember this latest amendment was suppose to be " seamless"..Apparently in managements eyes 4 years late is " seamless". A 2 yr deal will be enforced for a minimum of 5 years. A 4 year deal will be enforced for 8 years with zero retro of maybe 6 months retro. Get the picture?.And we all sit around like clowns wondering why we are falling so far behind..Management via RLA have us by the locked up in this ridiculously crappy deals that ALPA cuts just to get it over with. I say not this time as the pilots finally have leverage so let's not squander it away again.
Reply
Old 07-02-2022 | 05:51 AM
  #644  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 20,884
Likes: 199
Default

Originally Posted by notEnuf
Industry managers are racing to drop turds faster than a goat with IBS. They know something and want the contracts locked up. I'm happily waiting for the Q2 call and '23 projections.
Why are they only asking for 2 year contracts if that is the case?
Reply
Old 07-02-2022 | 06:06 AM
  #645  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2013
Posts: 136
Likes: 0
From: DL
Default

Originally Posted by sailingfun
Why are they only asking for 2 year contracts if that is the case?
The two year length is a big problem when they drag out the next contract for 3-4 years and pay 6 months retro.
Reply
Old 07-02-2022 | 06:26 AM
  #646  
Can’t find crew pickup
 
Joined: Jun 2021
Posts: 3,066
Likes: 210
Default

Originally Posted by Bobman80
The two year length is a big problem when they drag out the next contract for 3-4 years and pay 6 months retro.
Exactly. Drop a turd 2 year with small pay increases and spend the next 6 years on that contract cycle.
Reply
Old 07-02-2022 | 06:33 AM
  #647  
Boatbuilder's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: May 2015
Posts: 872
Likes: 85
From: 717a
Default

I’ve 5 years left (depending on the market). 20% DOS, FULL retro, and a complete rewrite of the RR rules are non negotiable for me. Other issues are high priority as well such as retirement enhancements, vacation, sick leave etc.
I’m not a single issue voter, but those first three are set in stone for me and I’m ready to walk to get them.
Reply
Old 07-02-2022 | 07:02 AM
  #648  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 20,884
Likes: 199
Default

Originally Posted by Bobman80
The two year length is a big problem when they drag out the next contract for 3-4 years and pay 6 months retro.
Would not a 4 year contract dragged out 3 to 4 years be even better for management?
Reply
Old 07-02-2022 | 09:27 AM
  #649  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jun 2015
Posts: 48
Likes: 0
From: MD88/90 CA
Default

Originally Posted by Myfingershurt
Surely they vote this thing down
If it doesn't, it becomes the new standard. It's time for the UAL Pilots to go 2015 on their MEC.
Reply
Old 07-02-2022 | 09:38 AM
  #650  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jul 2018
Posts: 1,128
Likes: 35
Default

Originally Posted by Buck Rogers
I guess a large part of this is semantics. I'm totally unsure of what you mean by...."Pay is a distant second" to QOL. Then categorize a 16.5 % increase as totally unacceptable.
Have you ever watched a foot race? Basically I want the runner named QOL Improvements to cross the finish line first. I’d like the runner named Pay Raises to cross second, but I don’t really care if he’s anywhere close to QOL Improvements, just as long as he’s ahead of the runner named Retirement.

And are you talking about United’s TA? First, their pay raises are 14.66-15.1%, depending on the fleet. Second, it was 4% for 2022, 5% for 2023, and 5% for 2024. I absolutely consider 4-5% yearly pay increases totally unacceptable, ESPECIALLY in light of their concessionary contract and the fact that the years 2020 and 2021 just apparently don’t matter at all for raises.

So, at some level, PAY is very important. What % pay rate would be the minimum at date of signing and then what annual pay bumps before you would say PAY is a distant second to QOL?
I don’t understand this question, because I already said pay is a distant second to QOL.

That being said, if there were substantial improvements to narrow body QOL, I’d be fine with pay raises that are only slightly above inflation. But I’d want 4-5% retro to the amendable date, 10-15% at date of signing, and 8-10% yearly until the next amendable date. That is with SUBSTANTIAL improvements.

If we’re only talking minor improvements, then the pay raises would need to be substantially higher.

If the runner named QOL Improvements does end up coming in second, then it had better be because the runner named Pay Raises was an Olympic athlete and totally destroyed the other runners, who were all high school gym class runners, so of course QOL Improvements would have no real chance to win.

Anyway, I’m just a single vote and this is all nonsense/fantasy. What I’d LIKE to see and what will eventually come out of the gaping anus of the airline negotiations sausage machine will be very different, and at that time I’ll analyze the TA as best as I can and then vote accordingly.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
Gordon C
Air Wisconsin
10
06-11-2020 03:16 PM
iahflyr
United
117
02-04-2018 04:52 AM
APC225
United
24
11-27-2013 05:49 AM
Rotor2prop
Major
13
07-11-2012 10:55 AM
Freight Dog
Money Talk
20
11-08-2011 01:06 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices