Search

Notices

Minimum Balance Plan

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-16-2022 | 08:18 AM
  #301  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 1,015
Likes: 13
Default

Originally Posted by notEnuf
Why you don't want to increase the DC benefit for all and shelter those funds as intended is incomprehensible.
Literally nobody except you has said they don’t want to increase DC funds. And wanting to put the money someplace besides the mbcbp is apparently only incomprehensible to you.
Reply
Old 11-16-2022 | 08:19 AM
  #302  
notEnuf's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 13,223
Likes: 670
From: ir.delta.com
Default

Originally Posted by bugman61
Again, you are saying everyone should stop working once we hit the irs compensation limit?
Not at all, I am saying there should be a tax sheltered vehicle for our much needed increase in DC funds. How much you choose to work is up to you.
Reply
Old 11-16-2022 | 08:19 AM
  #303  
Banned
 
Joined: Sep 2016
Posts: 8,831
Likes: 499
Default

Originally Posted by notEnuf
Why you don't want to increase the DC benefit for all and shelter those funds as intended is incomprehensible.
I want to increase DC. I don’t want to shelter those funds in the same way you do. Nowhere in PWA 26 is a low-performing fund prescribed, so I’m not sure where “as intended” comes from.
Reply
Old 11-16-2022 | 08:20 AM
  #304  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 12,480
Likes: 1,051
Default

Originally Posted by notEnuf
Hate to break it to you but your entire 401k is already "locked up" and nope your DC contributions are not spendable cash other than the overage you cherish.
​​​​​​
it's not locked up at all. It's very much accessible through a variety of mechanisms. And I, me get to decide if I put it in highly aggressive funds or bonds. No one else makes that decision for me.
Reply
Old 11-16-2022 | 08:20 AM
  #305  
Banned
 
Joined: Sep 2016
Posts: 8,831
Likes: 499
Default

Originally Posted by notEnuf
Not at all, I am saying there should be a tax sheltered vehicle for our much needed increase in DC funds. How much you choose to work is up to you.
there should be a tax-sheltered vehicle for you to use. It should be optional, because I have literally zero desire to use that same vehicle
Reply
Old 11-16-2022 | 08:23 AM
  #306  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Oct 2014
Posts: 1,015
Likes: 13
Default

Originally Posted by notEnuf
Not at all, I am saying there should be a tax sheltered vehicle for our much needed increase in DC funds. How much you choose to work is up to you.
That would be great, as an option. Many of us have no interest in confiscation of our money, or for additional tax deferral.
Reply
Old 11-16-2022 | 08:23 AM
  #307  
notEnuf's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 13,223
Likes: 670
From: ir.delta.com
Default

Originally Posted by bugman61
Literally nobody except you has said they don’t want to increase DC funds. And wanting to put the money someplace besides the mbcbp is apparently only incomprehensible to you.
Explain to me what the effective difference is between increasing DC to increase taxable wages and increasing pay rates. If we fail to get more DC then we are keeping your hourly rate bound to "reasonableness" with no real increase for retirement. The only way we justify more DC is to have a place to put it that isn't regular income.
Reply
Old 11-16-2022 | 08:25 AM
  #308  
Banned
 
Joined: Sep 2016
Posts: 8,831
Likes: 499
Default

Originally Posted by notEnuf
Explain to me what the effective difference is between increasing DC to increase taxable wages and increasing pay rates. If we fail to get more DC then we are keeping your hourly rate bound to "reasonableness" with no real increase for retirement. the only way we justify more DC is to have a place to put it that isn't regular income.
put yours in the MBCBP. We’d be ecstatic for you to be able to do so.
Reply
Old 11-16-2022 | 08:26 AM
  #309  
notEnuf's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 13,223
Likes: 670
From: ir.delta.com
Default

Originally Posted by OOfff
there should be a tax-sheltered vehicle for you to use. It should be optional, because I have literally zero desire to use that same vehicle
I agree completely but optionality lives in fantasy land so we will have to face this decision as a group.
Reply
Old 11-16-2022 | 08:27 AM
  #310  
Banned
 
Joined: Sep 2016
Posts: 8,831
Likes: 499
Default

Originally Posted by notEnuf
I agree completely but optionality lives in fantasy land so we will have to face this decision as a group.
okay. No thanks, then. You’ll have to find somewhere else to make money. Put it in QQQ and you’ll make out far better, anyway
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
TonyC
FedEx
243
06-13-2022 11:27 AM
Poeman
FedEx
1141
02-22-2022 03:37 PM
kronan
FedEx
241
07-12-2021 10:46 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices