Minimum Balance Plan
#301
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Oct 2014
Posts: 895
Literally nobody except you has said they don’t want to increase DC funds. And wanting to put the money someplace besides the mbcbp is apparently only incomprehensible to you.
#302
#303
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Sep 2016
Posts: 6,716
I want to increase DC. I don’t want to shelter those funds in the same way you do. Nowhere in PWA 26 is a low-performing fund prescribed, so I’m not sure where “as intended” comes from.
#304
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Jul 2013
Posts: 10,116
it's not locked up at all. It's very much accessible through a variety of mechanisms. And I, me get to decide if I put it in highly aggressive funds or bonds. No one else makes that decision for me.
#305
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Sep 2016
Posts: 6,716
there should be a tax-sheltered vehicle for you to use. It should be optional, because I have literally zero desire to use that same vehicle
#306
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Oct 2014
Posts: 895
That would be great, as an option. Many of us have no interest in confiscation of our money, or for additional tax deferral.
#307
Explain to me what the effective difference is between increasing DC to increase taxable wages and increasing pay rates. If we fail to get more DC then we are keeping your hourly rate bound to "reasonableness" with no real increase for retirement. The only way we justify more DC is to have a place to put it that isn't regular income.
#308
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Sep 2016
Posts: 6,716
Explain to me what the effective difference is between increasing DC to increase taxable wages and increasing pay rates. If we fail to get more DC then we are keeping your hourly rate bound to "reasonableness" with no real increase for retirement. the only way we justify more DC is to have a place to put it that isn't regular income.
#309
#310
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Sep 2016
Posts: 6,716
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
DLax85
Cargo
11
01-18-2017 07:53 PM