18/5/5/5
#401
Where the RLA works most aggressively against us is where the company can drag feet for long enough that “retro” becomes such a prohibitive cost item that it moves beyond the “zone of reasonableness”. Never mind how it got there, but if the company were to drag this along for, say, three more years, they could then make the claim that six years of retro is simply too much of a financial burden…unless, of course, the pilots are willing to give up a lot of things to get it.
In this, the RLA gives all the power to the company. We have zero power to secure timely contracts. We may insist on full retro, but the company merely has to drag it out long enough to place it beyond reach.
In this, the RLA gives all the power to the company. We have zero power to secure timely contracts. We may insist on full retro, but the company merely has to drag it out long enough to place it beyond reach.
#404
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Oct 2017
Position: 737 A
Posts: 901
This should be a target and would be a huge win for the industry.
#405
I’m quite confident there will be an AIP by EOY. Whether or not it’s good enough to make it by the MEC to become a TA is another matter entirely. I hope it does but…
#406
They always do. Nothing new here. That's why we need automatic pay increases as of the amendable date and an immediate mediation in the event the amendable date is approached without solutions. That soft money can also be quantified in a sense. So those automatic pay increases should take that into account, and should be punitive.
#407
#408
Im with you. Retro is a very important part of this negotiation. It needs to be high enough as to tell management that they’re still going to pay us eventually, no matter how long they drag their feet in negotiations, and that they aren’t saving any money in the long run. We’ve had guys retiring for 3 years while this has been going on, some aren’t due much, but more than half of the retirees are due a substantial sum of money and I’ll vote to see that they get it. The only thing I’ll accept in leu of full and substantial retro is CPI calculated pay raises that increase in perpetuity after the amendable date so we never find ourselves three years past the amendable date with pay rates that were negotiated 7 years earlier.
#409
Gets Weekends Off
Joined APC: Sep 2020
Posts: 277
#410
Yes. That’s the problem. The RLA is overseen and administered by U.S. Department of Labor,…..by and through federal mediators,….. who answer to the U.S. Secretary of Labor,……. who was formerly the mayor of Boston and a Massachusetts state representative and who likely has future political ambitions AND the need for political campaign funding.
While I hate the idea of unions funneling money to politicians, (especially those with a “D” after their names), it might be smart for DAPLA to test the waters and see if the Honorable Marty Walsh, U.S. Secretary of Labor, is in the mood to accept campaign funds from the unionized pilots of Delta Airlines and repay the favor by leaning on his federal mediator(s).
Just a thought.