Search

Notices

MOU 25-05

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-02-2026 | 02:19 PM
  #2591  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jan 2018
Posts: 510
Likes: 94
Default

Originally Posted by Casualinterest
Honestly have no idea which of the 100 threads about the 4th floor nonsense we’ve endured over the past two years to post this in, but

Jason Crude in Crew Planning has been officially forced out. They eliminated his position and basically forced him into retirement. Apparently HT’s job is secure now that they’ve got their scapegoat.
Lets focus on the important things. What is our AE memo gonna be called this month?
Reply
Old 05-02-2026 | 02:22 PM
  #2592  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Jul 2023
Posts: 702
Likes: 236
Default

Originally Posted by iLikeMoose
Lets focus on the important things. What is our AE memo gonna be called this month?
RIP Jason Cude Memo
Reply
Old 05-02-2026 | 04:08 PM
  #2593  
20Fathoms's Avatar
Line Holder
 
Joined: Mar 2019
Posts: 1,427
Likes: 169
Default

Originally Posted by iLikeMoose
Lets focus on the important things. What is our AE memo gonna be called this month?
Racketeering pref sheet.
Reply
Old 05-02-2026 | 09:24 PM
  #2594  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Feb 2024
Posts: 391
Likes: 75
Default

Originally Posted by Casualinterest
Honestly have no idea which of the 100 threads about the 4th floor nonsense we’ve endured over the past two years to post this in, but

Jason Crude in Crew Planning has been officially forced out. They eliminated his position and basically forced him into retirement. Apparently HT’s job is secure now that they’ve got their scapegoat.
Maybe that’s why there isn’t a new seniority list?
Reply
Old 05-03-2026 | 12:10 AM
  #2595  
Line Holder
5 Years
 
Joined: Aug 2018
Posts: 334
Likes: 59
Default

Originally Posted by crewdawg
If there isn't [mostly] guaranteed widespread easy money to be made, most won't drop all their schedule. While there are plenty of us who do drop everything we can, during normal times, most are too scared of "coming up short."
No...this is a false narrative.

There will always be a flow of easy, broken trips for those with the desire and means to drop their schedule. This benefits RSVs (less assignment/less efficient RSV utilization), low seniority pilots (who get the pick ups of the drops of the 'credit surfers'), and the high relative seniority pilots who get the high credit/low block broken trips that are never available on PBS, regardless of seniority.

What the company wants is to be able to meter these broken trips straight to RSV assignments for free (no m7) that they view as no cost (ie against RSV guarantee...another false narrative, but I'll save that analysis for another day), forcing lineholders to fly their PBS schedules (less 'churn').

This is the big scheduling issue that we need to make sure we don't give away.
Reply
Old 05-03-2026 | 03:21 AM
  #2596  
Moderator
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 7,490
Likes: 481
Default

Originally Posted by flightlessbirds
No...this is a false narrative.

There will always be a flow of easy, broken trips for those with the desire and means to drop their schedule. This benefits RSVs (less assignment/less efficient RSV utilization), low seniority pilots (who get the pick ups of the drops of the 'credit surfers'), and the high relative seniority pilots who get the high credit/low block broken trips that are never available on PBS, regardless of seniority.

We might be talking past each other here. I agree with your point here as I am one of those who has dropped their schedule and credit surfed for over a decade now. But it's not a false narrative to say that there hasn't been a recent increase in this strategy in hopes of easy/free money of m7 and QS. If that gravy train goes away, I'd guess that we'll see many of the recent adopters go back to their old ways, while you and I keep with this strategy. By gravy train, I don't mean moving RSV before WS, I just mean if they take away the ability to AA or something else that will drive down all the m7 being handed out like candy.



Originally Posted by flightlessbirds
What the company wants is to be able to meter these broken trips straight to RSV assignments for free (no m7) that they view as no cost (ie against RSV guarantee...another false narrative, but I'll save that analysis for another day), forcing lineholders to fly their PBS schedules (less 'churn').

This is the big scheduling issue that we need to make sure we don't give away.

I agree with you 100% here.

Last edited by crewdawg; 05-03-2026 at 03:32 AM.
Reply
Old 05-03-2026 | 04:22 AM
  #2597  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Jan 2020
Posts: 197
Likes: 32
From: 767
Default

Originally Posted by flightlessbirds
No...this is a false narrative.

There will always be a flow of easy, broken trips for those with the desire and means to drop their schedule. This benefits RSVs (less assignment/less efficient RSV utilization), low seniority pilots (who get the pick ups of the drops of the 'credit surfers'), and the high relative seniority pilots who get the high credit/low block broken trips that are never available on PBS, regardless of seniority.

What the company wants is to be able to meter these broken trips straight to RSV assignments for free (no m7) that they view as no cost (ie against RSV guarantee...another false narrative, but I'll save that analysis for another day), forcing lineholders to fly their PBS schedules (less 'churn').

This is the big scheduling issue that we need to make sure we don't give away.
There no chance chance something like that passed a vote.

Further if the company didn’t build such horrible trips a lot of that churn would go away.
Reply
Old 05-03-2026 | 04:56 AM
  #2598  
Trip7's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2007
Posts: 6,202
Likes: 266
Default

Originally Posted by flightlessbirds
No...this is a false narrative.

There will always be a flow of easy, broken trips for those with the desire and means to drop their schedule. This benefits RSVs (less assignment/less efficient RSV utilization), low seniority pilots (who get the pick ups of the drops of the 'credit surfers'), and the high relative seniority pilots who get the high credit/low block broken trips that are never available on PBS, regardless of seniority.

What the company wants is to be able to meter these broken trips straight to RSV assignments for free (no m7) that they view as no cost (ie against RSV guarantee...another false narrative, but I'll save that analysis for another day), forcing lineholders to fly their PBS schedules (less 'churn').

This is the big scheduling issue that we need to make sure we don't give away.
It's not a false narrative. As a credit surfer I agree with Crewdawg. There is risk that credit surfers take.
  • You can get hurt or sick and get potentially get stuck with a very low pay month.
  • Credit surfing only works in a certain about of categories that have an abundance of short leg traffic flow thru the base. Credit surfing is much more difficult in NYC than ATL.
  • There isn't always a flow of easy broken up trip and I wouldn't advise credit surfing to anyone who only has set amount of days to work. There's been times when it seems like WWIII to get a WSnon a weekend. There have been times when you wake up on a clear blue day in ATL with no open time and before you even have a chance to have breakfast ARCOS rings and you are heading to DHing to Aruba for 24hrs.
As far as trip coverage changes, credit surfers don't scrutinize, we improvise. Hypothetically speaking, even if they flowed easy WS to RSV it would decimate reserve coverage and lead to an ever larger increase of QS/SS/GS. Credit surfing technique has already started shifting to SS/QS in lieu of WS/GS and that would further the migration even more.

Don't hate the player, hate the game


Reply
Old 05-03-2026 | 06:05 AM
  #2599  
GutterGuard's Avatar
Line Holder
On Reserve
 
Joined: Sep 2025
Posts: 1,050
Likes: 851
Default

What's all this about Cude being removed?
Reply
Old 05-03-2026 | 06:09 AM
  #2600  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 12,532
Likes: 1,129
Default

Originally Posted by GutterGuard
What's all this about Cude being removed?
I guess someone has to pay for the incompetence. It certainly wouldn't be the people who ACTUALLY are causing this.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
cactiboss
American
355
09-21-2015 05:20 PM
Doctor
American
250
01-29-2014 12:47 PM
R57 relay
American
86
01-06-2013 09:49 AM
TonyWilliams
Cargo
257
09-09-2010 04:31 PM
fr8rcaptain
Cargo
0
05-12-2009 03:20 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices