Search

Notices

MOU 25-05

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 11-06-2025 | 01:29 PM
  #501  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 12,363
Likes: 904
Default

Originally Posted by notEnuf
Then you should get what your residency provides, no more or less.
Originally Posted by Whoopsmybad
Oh goodie, commuting is a choice, and we should never try and improve our contract in any way, especially in a way that is currently pilots have different protections (lawsuits not withstanding) just because a difference in base gives different protections.
Minimum wage for you! That's the state law, that's all you get.... respectfully, NotEnuf
Reply
Old 11-06-2025 | 04:36 PM
  #502  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Mar 2016
Posts: 158
Likes: 22
Default

Originally Posted by gloopy
That’s why we need a contractual provision that anything any state we have a domicile in gets, we all get. The vast majority of people in states that pass those laws get a tiny tiny fraction of the sick allotment we do. Ours is a completely different system by design. To give some bases 270 hours for relatives while others get none isn’t ok since we all negotiated and paid for that cost item.

Anything those bases get, we all get. Put it in the PWA and make everyone share its cost equally for equal benefit.
It's 56 hours/year in NY. They're already required by law to provide 56 hours/year to NYC based pilots and are just ignoring the law. ALPA should be taking them to court. Because the company would likely lose in court and public opinion, it would require much less negotiating capital to achieve a requirement for all pilots. So, I agree with you.
Reply
Old 11-06-2025 | 05:04 PM
  #503  
Gets Weekends Off
Liked
25M+ Airline Miles
Line Holder
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 12,821
Likes: 153
From: window seat
Default

Originally Posted by notEnuf
Those states fought for it while other states want to ride coat tails. Without making this political, start advocating for this at home.
Fought for it? lol sure. How brave to simply decree that companies must do it.

I’m not against the laws. I’m just adamant that we all get to use our collectively negotiated benefit the same way.
Reply
Old 11-06-2025 | 05:07 PM
  #504  
Gets Weekends Off
Liked
25M+ Airline Miles
Line Holder
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 12,821
Likes: 153
From: window seat
Default

Originally Posted by OOfff
yup! you want it, vote for it.
we already did when we voted for C19. The benefits were equally paid for and are now unequally used.

therefore it requires a correction in C25 to stipulate that what one base gets all bases get from our collectively negotiated benefit.

if you want special and extra benefits in your state then vote for extra taxes to fund those benefits. CBA cost items equally shared by us all shouldn’t give you extra benefits.
Reply
Old 11-06-2025 | 05:10 PM
  #505  
Gets Weekends Off
Liked
25M+ Airline Miles
Line Holder
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 12,821
Likes: 153
From: window seat
Default

Originally Posted by m3113n1a1
A PWA provision that United already has! If one base can use sick time to care for family members, then it has to be extended to every base per their PWA.
if true that’s awesome and even more of a must have item for C25.
Reply
Old 11-06-2025 | 07:25 PM
  #506  
notEnuf's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 13,183
Likes: 638
From: ir.delta.com
Default

Originally Posted by gloopy
Fought for it? lol sure. How brave to simply decree that companies must do it.

I’m not against the laws. I’m just adamant that we all get to use our collectively negotiated benefit the same way.
If we are using a socialist philosophy to spread the wealth what about the rest of it? Silver slips, 23M7, single universal pay scale etc.? How about childcare and eldercare? Where are we drawing the line? I just hate when people attack my state for social safety nets and taxes and then claim they should be entitled to it. I think we all eventually will get it but Delta has to figure out how to spin it as a company idea and win for management.
Reply
Old 11-07-2025 | 09:27 AM
  #507  
Gets Weekends Off
Liked
25M+ Airline Miles
Line Holder
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2010
Posts: 12,821
Likes: 153
From: window seat
Default

Originally Posted by notEnuf
If we are using a socialist philosophy to spread the wealth what about the rest of it? Silver slips, 23M7, single universal pay scale etc.? How about childcare and eldercare? Where are we drawing the line? I just hate when people attack my state for social safety nets and taxes and then claim they should be entitled to it. I think we all eventually will get it but Delta has to figure out how to spin it as a company idea and win for management.
Thats quite the extrapolation. Socialism? Trying to compare anything and everything in a PWA to top down national or global absolute authority government is an interesting exercise but well beyond the scope of this topic.

I’m also not “attacking your state” for this. I don’t know what state it even is nor do I care other than insofar as this narrow topic goes, I assume it’s a state that has decreed that you get superior monetary value from an equally negotiated benefit for us all.

While I do personally favor lower taxes, I have nothing against localities or states that want sky high taxes. It doesn’t bother me one bit if your state passes a 100% income tax rate with no deductions to fund all your hopes and dreams. You do you. If your state wants to tax to fund generous family care programs I wouldn’t lift a finger to stop it.

But that’s not what THIS is.

A state decreeing that your 240-270 annual sick hours can be used for that is a cost item that we ALL carry at contract time that you get to use MUCH differently than the rest of us. I’m also not saying I want your benefit to be eliminated. All I AM saying is that every domicile should be able to use our EQUALLY NEGOTIATED CBA/PWA benefits…EQUALLY.

Why would you possibly be against that?

Also, doesn’t UAL have some kind of provision to dress that? While compelling if true, even if it’s not, we should put that in C25. Why would you possibly take issue with that?

Your state’s taxes have nothing to do with that because that benefit is not being funded from those taxes, it’s merely an edict that ALPA negotiated benefits apply more to you than to others.

Why would you possibly be against what I’m advocating for?
Reply
Old 11-07-2025 | 10:20 AM
  #508  
notEnuf's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Mar 2015
Posts: 13,183
Likes: 638
From: ir.delta.com
Default

Originally Posted by gloopy
Thats quite the extrapolation. Socialism? Trying to compare anything and everything in a PWA to top down national or global absolute authority government is an interesting exercise but well beyond the scope of this topic.

I’m also not “attacking your state” for this. I don’t know what state it even is nor do I care other than insofar as this narrow topic goes, I assume it’s a state that has decreed that you get superior monetary value from an equally negotiated benefit for us all.

While I do personally favor lower taxes, I have nothing against localities or states that want sky high taxes. It doesn’t bother me one bit if your state passes a 100% income tax rate with no deductions to fund all your hopes and dreams. You do you. If your state wants to tax to fund generous family care programs I wouldn’t lift a finger to stop it.

But that’s not what THIS is.

A state decreeing that your 240-270 annual sick hours can be used for that is a cost item that we ALL carry at contract time that you get to use MUCH differently than the rest of us. I’m also not saying I want your benefit to be eliminated. All I AM saying is that every domicile should be able to use our EQUALLY NEGOTIATED CBA/PWA benefits…EQUALLY.

Why would you possibly be against that?

Also, doesn’t UAL have some kind of provision to dress that? While compelling if true, even if it’s not, we should put that in C25. Why would you possibly take issue with that?

Your state’s taxes have nothing to do with that because that benefit is not being funded from those taxes, it’s merely an edict that ALPA negotiated benefits apply more to you than to others.

Why would you possibly be against what I’m advocating for?
I'm really not but the argument would be misuse of negotiating capital. If you want the benefit afforded by a particular locale, state in this case, you could move there if it's that important. I don't live in FL but if I wanted 0 state income tax, then I can move there. I'm not advocating anything except self reliance and determination. Like I said, we will get this eventually. We need to let the courts hash it out and corporate america to realize this is happening.
Reply
Old 11-07-2025 | 11:01 AM
  #509  
FangsF15's Avatar
Moderator
 
Joined: Sep 2011
Posts: 8,099
Likes: 1,047
Default

Originally Posted by notEnuf
I'm really not but the argument would be misuse of negotiating capital. If you want the benefit afforded by a particular locale, state in this case, you could move there if it's that important. I don't live in FL but if I wanted 0 state income tax, then I can move there. I'm not advocating anything except self reliance and determination. Like I said, we will get this eventually. We need to let the courts hash it out and corporate america to realize this is happening.
Again, you are conflating national/state law, with our negotiated PWA. Two completely, totally, entirely, wholly, thoroughly, and altogether different animals.
Reply
Old 11-07-2025 | 11:15 AM
  #510  
Banned
 
Joined: Sep 2016
Posts: 8,831
Likes: 499
Default

Originally Posted by FangsF15
Again, you are conflating national/state law, with our negotiated PWA. Two completely, totally, entirely, wholly, thoroughly, and altogether different animals.
so should we be denied the kaiser health option since it’s not available in your state? or the nepp parking options?
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
cactiboss
American
355
09-21-2015 05:20 PM
Doctor
American
250
01-29-2014 12:47 PM
R57 relay
American
86
01-06-2013 09:49 AM
TonyWilliams
Cargo
257
09-09-2010 04:31 PM
fr8rcaptain
Cargo
0
05-12-2009 03:20 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices