Notices

Openers today?

Old 04-20-2026 | 12:58 PM
  #361  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Aug 2014
Posts: 134
Likes: 12
Default

Originally Posted by TED74
Divide $23M/month by 17,500 pilots and I think you’ll find it actually isn’t much value per individual. I assume the company actually wants to reduce that bill and not just pay it elsewhere, so I simply can’t see them bringing anything that will pass memrat to the masses. Triple pay is here to stay for a long time, I’m guessing.

I sure won’t vote for any deal that puts $23m/17,500 in my pocket every month (roughly $1k after tax). I probably make ten times that solving the daily gummster fires management created with their incompetence.
That would essentially be a cost-neutral contract. I certainly hope ALPA doesn’t settle for that.
Reply
Old 04-20-2026 | 12:59 PM
  #362  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2015
Posts: 5,516
Likes: 186
From: UNA
Default

Originally Posted by Red Swingline
We better hope they don’t just put it back to the way it was pre COVID - no batch sizes and no auto accept. Guys phones were ringing off the hook back then and that was before they staffed this place dependent on premium flying.
i think that depends on the slip type. For example if they only went to single step coverage for out of base slips, that would probably get a different reaction from the pilots than if they did all slips.

and wasn’t fall of 2019 when the “a little hot” email came out?
Reply
Old 04-20-2026 | 01:18 PM
  #363  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 12,470
Likes: 1,026
Default

Originally Posted by Viper25
If they don’t reduce the value of 23m/month, and just redistribute it elsewhere, is it not still a win for them operationally even though not financially? Not saying I disagree with you in general though. There needs to be a steep cost to them for us to help them out of their mess.
I think this is going to be a major sticking point and serious propaganda fodder for a small but vocal percent of the list that will see a substantial decrease in pay and an equal substantial increase in work. It doesn't matter what's in the contract for the farmers. We just have to make sure to fairly evaluate an agreement and not let people who would never agree to fix m7 in the first place drive the boat.
Reply
Old 04-20-2026 | 01:31 PM
  #364  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 12,470
Likes: 1,026
Default

Originally Posted by Red Swingline
That would essentially be a cost-neutral contract. I certainly hope ALPA doesn’t settle for that.
I hope so too. I have spoken with my rep and made it very clear that it needs to exceed expectations if it's going to get through memrat on a short timeline especially considering how management has viewed the previous agreement and public display of contempt for the pilots.
Reply
Old 04-20-2026 | 01:41 PM
  #365  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2022
Posts: 2,244
Likes: 1,076
Default

Originally Posted by CBreezy
I think this is going to be a major sticking point and serious propaganda fodder for a small but vocal percent of the list that will see a substantial decrease in pay and an equal substantial increase in work. It doesn't matter what's in the contract for the farmers. We just have to make sure to fairly evaluate an agreement and not let people who would never agree to fix m7 in the first place drive the boat.
Right, but the flip side of that is the group that has never received a 23M7 payment, doesn’t understand its value, and doesn’t care about the value of a potential trade. This is the group that RG is banking on to influence the MEC enough to win a discounted deal. It’s also a small, but vocal minority.

The entire pilot group should become aware of not only the value of auto-accept/23M7, but also its secondary operational effects. As others have said, auto-accept drives trips into premium coverage that wouldn’t have otherwise gone premium. Most pilots have likely benefitted at least once, even if indirectly.

This leverage represents one of the best opportunities in recent history for the pilot group to make significant gains across the entire contract. This is not the time to sell ourselves short.
Reply
Old 04-20-2026 | 01:53 PM
  #366  
crewdawg's Avatar
Moderator
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 7,413
Likes: 413
Default

Originally Posted by ancman
Right, but the flip side of that is the group that has never received a 23M7 payment, doesn’t understand its value, and doesn’t care about the value of a potential trade. This is the group that RG is banking on to influence the MEC enough to win a discounted deal. It’s also a small, but vocal minority.

The entire pilot group should become aware of not only the value of auto-accept/23M7, but also its secondary operational effects. As others have said, auto-accept drives trips into premium coverage that wouldn’t have otherwise gone premium. Most pilots have likely benefitted at least once, even if indirectly.

This leverage represents one of the best opportunities in recent history for the pilot group to make significant gains across the entire contract. This is not the time to sell ourselves short.

Yup. For every one top page type that has already collected 14 23M7 trips (many multi-day...and just the ones in base) this month, there is about 90% of the rest of the list that isn't getting a thing, even premium. Worse, many of them are not getting the W trips that they'd normally get (for those who play that game), and/or losing out on premium opportunities because trips are taking so long to be awarded. It's not all rainbows and dollar signs for everyone.
Reply
Old 04-20-2026 | 01:53 PM
  #367  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2013
Posts: 12,470
Likes: 1,026
Default

Originally Posted by ancman
Right, but the flip side of that is the group that has never received a 23M7 payment, doesn’t understand its value, and doesn’t care about the value of a potential trade. This is the group that RG is banking on to influence the MEC enough to win a discounted deal. It’s also a small, but vocal minority.

The entire pilot group should become aware of not only the value of auto-accept/23M7, but also its secondary operational effects. As others have said, auto-accept drives trips into premium coverage that wouldn’t have otherwise gone premium. Most pilots have likely benefitted at least once, even if indirectly.

This leverage represents one of the best opportunities in recent history for the pilot group to make significant gains across the entire contract. This is not the time to sell ourselves short.
I think there are certainly some that would personally benefit from getting rid of AA/m7 usage. But I also know and am confident that the MEC is very well aware of the value. The ATL CA Rep alone being the former scheduling committee chair is testament to that alone. That and the MEC Chair being the one who negotiated c19. I'm actually concerned at this point that we will get a great deal and it will be scuttled by guys who live off M7 and people who just want to punish the company all summer
Reply
Old 04-20-2026 | 01:54 PM
  #368  
Can’t find crew pickup
 
Joined: Jun 2021
Posts: 3,036
Likes: 186
Default

Originally Posted by ancman
Right, but the flip side of that is the group that has never received a 23M7 payment, doesn’t understand its value, and doesn’t care about the value of a potential trade. This is the group that RG is banking on to influence the MEC enough to win a discounted deal. It’s also a small, but vocal minority.

The entire pilot group should become aware of not only the value of auto-accept/23M7, but also its secondary operational effects. As others have said, auto-accept drives trips into premium coverage that wouldn’t have otherwise gone premium. Most pilots have likely benefitted at least once, even if indirectly.

This leverage represents one of the best opportunities in recent history for the pilot group to make significant gains across the entire contract. This is not the time to sell ourselves short.
I think you way over estimate the number of pilots that benefit on a regular basis. I can’t get premium at all (pretty well staffed category) and don’t get M7. Some trips I might have gotten as a GS can’t get to me, and by the time they hit the panic button, I can’t be there in time.
Im firmly in the hold the line category, and I regularly engage my reps. But know for sure I’m far from the only one that fits in my situation either.
Reply
Old 04-20-2026 | 01:55 PM
  #369  
Can’t find crew pickup
 
Joined: Jun 2021
Posts: 3,036
Likes: 186
Default

Originally Posted by Gone Flying
I would rather have the current m7 fiasco and no new contract than a subpar new agreement. I will vote accordingly and I bet most here will too.

IMO one of the big leverages we have with renegotiating to end M7 is not just the cost but the labor it frees up. how many pilots are flying very little because they can get paid M7 pay without working? M7 goes away and most those pilots are probably back to flying full ish schedule quickly

time is on our side. If we can get a deal done quick that recognizes our goals then great. If HT and RG want to play hardball I am more than happy to wind the clock, and from the sound of it so is our MEC.
This is exactly the feedback I get from my reps.
Reply
Old 04-20-2026 | 02:01 PM
  #370  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2022
Posts: 2,244
Likes: 1,076
Default

Originally Posted by Whoopsmybad
I think you way over estimate the number of pilots that benefit on a regular basis. I can’t get premium at all (pretty well staffed category) and don’t get M7. Some trips I might have gotten as a GS can’t get to me, and by the time they hit the panic button, I can’t be there in time.
Im firmly in the hold the line category, and I regularly engage my reps. But know for sure I’m far from the only one that fits in my situation either.
Most pilots fall into that category, most of the time. But that group (the majority) can still leverage 23.M.7 by holding out for a deal that properly leverages its value. That’s what I’m hopeful we will see.
Reply
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
satpak77
Military
11
10-07-2011 02:53 PM
SrfNFly227
Regional
48
06-11-2009 09:02 PM
jungle
Money Talk
2
02-19-2009 07:50 PM
Longbow64
Flight Schools and Training
18
12-19-2007 05:15 AM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Your Privacy Choices