Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? >

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Search

Notices

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-22-2012 | 03:19 PM
  #100621  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2011
Posts: 403
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by slowplay
Not exactly...it's an aircraft delivery (event based) as well as time based ratio. If management never buys another 76 seater, then the ratio doesn't come into play. If they buy all 70 allowable, then they have to have 88 small narrowbody aircraft on the property, 125 50 seaters left, and a max of 450 total DCI left. Then they do the ratio and ensure that for every block hour DCI flies mainline has at least 1.56. It's planned to be over 1.7.
What is the timeframe for required compliance on this? If they have all 70 sparkling new 76-seaters on their way to DCI on 2 Jul 12, by when must they increase the mainline fleet by 88, and for how long must they keep them? By when must they cut the 50 seaters to 125?
Old 05-22-2012 | 03:41 PM
  #100622  
Bucking Bar's Avatar
Can't abide NAI
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 12,078
Likes: 15
From: Douglas Aerospace post production Flight Test & Work Around Engineering bulletin dissembler
Default

Originally Posted by forgot to bid
It's almost comical the way this is unrolling. Bar called it, 717s if you sign off on bigger lower casm 76 seaters.

But the problem with the carrot is everyone looks around and says won't the 717s come anyways? And if not, are we better off? A giant order of 76 seaters sure makes you scratch your head wondering if we're supposed to say yes to 76 seaters that replace mainline jets and 717s that just replacement jets. Is it best just to say no and stick to 255 and the current fleet?

Sailing, is there a wb order on the way? That's been rumored before too.
Thank you. Bar's source is himself, DOT data and a calculator. Figure out the numbers and you know where management's looking. In any defense play, watch the eyes.

Don't get me started on 777-300's once we get our balance sheet fixed by flipping leases and capacity purchase contract modifications. I have not finished that homework yet.
Old 05-22-2012 | 03:43 PM
  #100623  
Banned
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 2,007
Likes: 0
From: Space Shuttle PIC
Default

Originally Posted by Bucking Bar
Thank you. Bar's source is himself, DOT data and a calculator. Figure out the numbers and you know where management's looking. In any defense play, watch the eyes.

Don't get me started on 777-300's once we get our balance sheet fixed by flipping leases and capacity purchase contract modifications. I have not finished that homework yet.
Delta had nothing to lose by wording it that way. If we don't take the TA, Southwest gets to keep a plane they don't want, and that will cost them money if they just park them. If we did take it, then we get a cheap plane to replace planes passengers don't want to fly in places like LGA, which would love those 717s. Those planes are the perfect fit for that demographic. We all know the 50 seaters are cramped and old, and this TA gives Delta a way out and a cheap replacement in a bigger plane.
Old 05-22-2012 | 04:06 PM
  #100624  
Bucking Bar's Avatar
Can't abide NAI
 
Joined: Jun 2007
Posts: 12,078
Likes: 15
From: Douglas Aerospace post production Flight Test & Work Around Engineering bulletin dissembler
Default

Bill,

Something is happening in that space (120 seats) with, or without, passage of this TA. The difference is whether we want to go forward under our current contract with 3 to 1 language. The addition of 88 jets if done tomorrow would be close to a wash on new CRJ900's. The TA makes it less painful to restructure DCI, but it will happen regardless... perhaps slower and with more debt which stalls financing of other needed replacements for mainline.

Today's announcement should have been last Thursday at the Bank America presentation. Do not know why the timing has been so awkward.
Old 05-22-2012 | 04:12 PM
  #100625  
flyallnite's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 1,898
Likes: 0
From: Stay THIRSTY, my friends!
Default

Just some thoughts about scope-- that by allowing more 76 seat jets on the property, we are doing several detrimental things to ourselves.

#1. We are giving away our jobs, and once they are gone, they aren't ever coming back.

#2. We are permitting the creation and perpetuation of a sub-class of professionals who will do the same job for much less compensation and contractual protections.

#3. We are allowing, once again, the line to be drawn further down the field, keeping momentum on the side of outsourcing.

#4. We are permitting to exist an airline within an airline that is possibly going to be over half the size of SWA-- flying our pax.

#5. We are telling the company, the other airlines, and the world that we will sell our own jobs for a few bucks today, that we are for sale, and we can be had.

#6. We are turning our backs on what is very likely the only chance we will ever collectively have industry wide to put the scope genie back in the bottle.
Old 05-22-2012 | 04:17 PM
  #100626  
scambo1's Avatar
The Brown Dot +1
 
Joined: Jun 2009
Posts: 7,775
Likes: 0
From: 777B
Default

Originally Posted by flyallnite
Just some thoughts about scope-- that by allowing more 76 seat jets on the property, we are doing several detrimental things to ourselves.

#1. We are giving away our jobs, and once they are gone, they aren't ever coming back.

#2. We are permitting the creation and perpetuation of a sub-class of professionals who will do the same job for much less compensation and contractual protections.

#3. We are allowing, once again, the line to be drawn further down the field, keeping momentum on the side of outsourcing.

#4. We are permitting to exist an airline within an airline that is possibly going to be over half the size of SWA-- flying our pax.

#5. We are telling the company, the other airlines, and the world that we will sell our own jobs for a few bucks today, that we are for sale, and we can be had.

#6. We are turning our backs on what is very likely the only chance we will ever collectively have industry wide to put the scope genie back in the bottle.

Well said. The whole thing, but the last two points are so important.

Folks are talking about positives and tiny miniscule changes that might make this pass.

It should NEVER NEVER EVER pass. It should NEVER HAVE BEEN ENTERTAINED BY DALPA!!!
Old 05-22-2012 | 04:23 PM
  #100627  
forgot to bid's Avatar
veut gagner à la loterie
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 23,286
Likes: 0
From: Light Chop
Default

Originally Posted by Bucking Bar
Thank you. Bar's source is himself, DOT data and a calculator. Figure out the numbers and you know where management's looking. In any defense play, watch the eyes.

Don't get me started on 777-300's once we get our balance sheet fixed by flipping leases and capacity purchase contract modifications. I have not finished that homework yet.
I know we're taking care of the 744s and modifying them, but I'd like assurances 773s are not the 747 killers they've been elsewhere.

I like our whales. Fun to look at it. Still can't figure out why we don't use real video of them taking off in commercials.
Old 05-22-2012 | 04:23 PM
  #100628  
flyallnite's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 1,898
Likes: 0
From: Stay THIRSTY, my friends!
Default

I think it's become pretty clear by now (the UAL Chairman's memo, the 717 purchase, the non-contract employee raises) that this TA is the spearhead of an industry wide effort to contain labor costs, with DALPA, knowingly or not, facilitating the effort. C'mon, does anybody think the non-contract employees will get anything other than 4-8-3-3? A 10 cent per diem increase with a corresponding reduction in profit sharing?! Why must we be tied to FA compensation? To regional airline fleet plans? To ALPA member hiring quotas? To having to pay for re-fleeting mainline?
Old 05-22-2012 | 04:29 PM
  #100629  
flyallnite's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Dec 2009
Posts: 1,898
Likes: 0
From: Stay THIRSTY, my friends!
Default

... and what about retro pay? All this talk of time value of money... Is DALPA basically saying that they will break with past precedent and NOT demand retro pay from amendable date?? Even if you retire, you still get a retro check if the pay rate increase for the hours you flew... do you not?
Old 05-22-2012 | 04:39 PM
  #100630  
dragon's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 1,601
Likes: 0
From: Dismayed
Default

First NNP is out, thoughts?
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
On Autopilot
Regional
22617
11-05-2021 07:03 AM
AeroCrewSolut
Delta
153
08-14-2018 12:18 PM
Bill Lumberg
Major
71
06-13-2012 08:36 AM
Quagmire
Major
253
04-16-2011 06:19 AM
JiffyLube
Major
12
03-07-2008 04:27 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices