Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? >

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Search

Notices

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 05-22-2012 | 11:47 AM
  #100591  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Sep 2007
Posts: 1,518
Likes: 0
From: B737 CA
Default

I have a question. How hard is it to get info on which 50 seater leases Delta has assumed or renewed, when, and for how long? It seems to me some of these leases are ridiculously long, and it's been known for quite a while that 50 seaters are inefficient and DL has a glut of them. Is it possible that Delta intentionally leased too many 50 seaters for too long, knowing they could parlay those aircraft into the big RJ's they really wanted? This TA has been a long time in the making even though DAL is making it seem very rush-rush now. I'm guessing the 50-for-76 swap has been a management wet dream since the jcba, if not since BK.
Old 05-22-2012 | 12:03 PM
  #100592  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Default

I am at a Connection Carrier and agree with most everyone ALPA representing Majors and there regionals is a total conflict of interest. It has been that way for many years now. Why have our dues not gone directly to repeal the RLA in some form in order to have more leverage against our comapanies when negotiations come around? Just curious. Seems like we continue to mow over the weeds instead of picking them out by the root. The root being our lack of leverage against bankrupcy, subpar TA's, the list goes on...any thoughts
Old 05-22-2012 | 12:04 PM
  #100593  
On Reserve
 
Joined: Aug 2010
Posts: 14
Likes: 0
Default

their*******
Old 05-22-2012 | 12:06 PM
  #100594  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,539
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by tsquare

Hey slow. Section 1.D.9 has block hour ratios based on the 767-300 (non ER) aircraft. Since management has already stated that those airplanes are destined for the scrap heap, why is this even in the contract. I think this could be a GREAT thing, since a ratio based on zero is zero. Or is there another loophole that I don't see?
The intent was to capture domestic flying, and the 767-300 non ER type is a domestic aircraft. So if those block hours go away without replacement, DCI has to shrink even more under the block hour ratio.
Old 05-22-2012 | 12:08 PM
  #100595  
tsquare's Avatar
No longer cares
 
Joined: Mar 2008
Posts: 12,109
Likes: 0
From: 767er Captain
Default

Originally Posted by slowplay
The intent was to capture domestic flying, and the 767-300 non ER type is a domestic aircraft. So if those block hours go away without replacement, DCI has to shrink even more under the block hour ratio.
But not until after 2014, right? That is when the snapshot is taken...
Old 05-22-2012 | 12:19 PM
  #100596  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,539
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by newKnow
Or, am I wrong in thinking that allowing a reserve pilot to fly 15 hours over ALV is a bad thing whereas as of today he can't be assigned anything over the ALV?

My thoughts are more work fit reserve pilots and less staffing required. (less jobs)
Going off memory here, so don't smack me too hard if I've got a piece of data wrong. I'm going to be (hopefully) off the grid tomorrow so I'll look this stuff up Thursday.

The changes to reserve were part of a package, and that package has some job protections in it. First is the ALV. Once you've reached it you can't be assigned more flying. If you're under it you can be assigned ALV +15. But that is limited by the staffing formula, as it requires jobs to be added when reserves are used more than 60 hours per month on average. Another protection is the 6 additional scheduled X days per year, increasing to up to 18 additional for categories staffed at over 20%.

Bottom line, with the additional time off and the staffing formula as a backdrop, there's no way to run reserves at ALV + 15 for any length of time.
Old 05-22-2012 | 12:22 PM
  #100597  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,539
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by tsquare
But not until after 2014, right? That is when the snapshot is taken...
Not exactly...it's an aircraft delivery (event based) as well as time based ratio. If management never buys another 76 seater, then the ratio doesn't come into play. If they buy all 70 allowable, then they have to have 88 small narrowbody aircraft on the property, 125 50 seaters left, and a max of 450 total DCI left. Then they do the ratio and ensure that for every block hour DCI flies mainline has at least 1.56. It's planned to be over 1.7.
Old 05-22-2012 | 12:24 PM
  #100598  
newKnow's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 6,844
Likes: 0
From: 765-A
Default

Originally Posted by slowplay
Going off memory here, so don't smack me too hard if I've got a piece of data wrong. I'm going to be (hopefully) off the grid tomorrow so I'll look this stuff up Thursday.

The changes to reserve were part of a package, and that package has some job protections in it. First is the ALV. Once you've reached it you can't be assigned more flying. If you're under it you can be assigned ALV +15. But that is limited by the staffing formula, as it requires jobs to be added when reserves are used more than 60 hours per month on average. Another protection is the 6 additional scheduled X days per year, increasing to up to 18 additional for categories staffed at over 20%.

Bottom line, with the additional time off and the staffing formula as a backdrop, there's no way to run reserves at ALV + 15 for any length of time.
Thanks slow. I was damn worried. Hell. I think I still am. This give and take can be interpreted to be a lot of smoke and mirrors. Those road show presenters had better be prepared for a lot of skepticism.
Old 05-22-2012 | 12:28 PM
  #100599  
Line Holder
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 98
Likes: 0
From: DAL 7ER FO
Default

Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp
Slow- care to address the exemption on page 1-7, lines 1-3 (note 2)?
It's right in the definitions:

14. “Circumstance over which the Company does not have control,” for the purposes of
28
Section 1, means a circumstance that includes, but is not limited to, a natural disaster;
29 labor dispute; grounding of a substantial number of the Company’s aircraft by a
30 government agency; reduction in flying operations because of a decrease in available fuel
31 supply or other critical materials due to either governmental action or commercial
32 suppliers being unable to provide sufficient fuel or other critical materials for the
33 Company’s operations; revocation of the Company’s operating certificate(s); war
34 emergency; owner’s delay in delivery of aircraft scheduled for delivery; manufacturer’s
35 delay in delivery of new aircraft scheduled for delivery. The term “circumstance over
36 which the Company does not have control” will not include the price of fuel or other
37 supplies, the price of aircraft, the state of the economy, the financial state of the
38 Company, or the relative profitability or unprofitability of the Company’s then-current

39 operations.
Old 05-22-2012 | 12:30 PM
  #100600  
Moderator
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 13,088
Likes: 0
From: B757/767
Default

Originally Posted by slowplay
The intent was to capture domestic flying, and the 767-300 non ER type is a domestic aircraft. So if those block hours go away without replacement, DCI has to shrink even more under the block hour ratio.
Originally Posted by slowplay
Going off memory here, so don't smack me too hard if I've got a piece of data wrong. I'm going to be (hopefully) off the grid tomorrow so I'll look this stuff up Thursday.

The changes to reserve were part of a package, and that package has some job protections in it. First is the ALV. Once you've reached it you can't be assigned more flying. If you're under it you can be assigned ALV +15. But that is limited by the staffing formula, as it requires jobs to be added when reserves are used more than 60 hours per month on average. Another protection is the 6 additional scheduled X days per year, increasing to up to 18 additional for categories staffed at over 20%.

Bottom line, with the additional time off and the staffing formula as a backdrop, there's no way to run reserves at ALV + 15 for any length of time.
Originally Posted by slowplay
Not exactly...it's an aircraft delivery (event based) as well as time based ratio. If management never buys another 76 seater, then the ratio doesn't come into play. If they buy all 70 allowable, then they have to have 88 small narrowbody aircraft on the property, 125 50 seaters left, and a max of 450 total DCI left. Then they do the ratio and ensure that for every block hour DCI flies mainline has at least 1.56. It's planned to be over 1.7.
Slow,

Thanks for the clarification. This helps a lot.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
On Autopilot
Regional
22617
11-05-2021 07:03 AM
AeroCrewSolut
Delta
153
08-14-2018 12:18 PM
Bill Lumberg
Major
71
06-13-2012 08:36 AM
Quagmire
Major
253
04-16-2011 06:19 AM
JiffyLube
Major
12
03-07-2008 04:27 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices