Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? >

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?


Notices

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Old 05-24-2012 | 08:43 PM
  #101171  
Carl Spackler's Avatar
Back on TDY
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 12,487
Likes: 0
From: 747-400 Captain
Default

Originally Posted by slowplay
It was asked. The MEC looked at the numbers to try and make the operation cost-competitive on mainline. It would have been a horrendous B-scale. The one-time startup costs, pilot contract costs, and other related costs completely outstripped savings on the DCI margins. We even looked at adding seats into the aircraft that were capable of higher density, and there wasn't enough revenue to offset mainline expenses at our current costs (pre-TA).
That is so disingenuous that it's nearly PURE BS. LEC resolutions have asked for this study many times and you unelected MEC bureaucrats have steadfastly refused.

Furthermore, negotiations is NOT about making us cost competitive with some bottom feeding regional. Negotiations is about first wanting something as the objective, then spending capital as necessary to make it happen. Unbelievable.

The FACT is that your MEC and sadly, MEC's before you DO NOT WANT this flying at mainline for whatever sick and twisted reason. Moak used to say that kind of flying was beneath the mainline pilot. I'm afraid that arrogant legacy lives on.

Carl
Old 05-24-2012 | 08:48 PM
  #101172  
Boomer's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 4,629
Likes: 15
From: blueJet
Default

Originally Posted by gloopy
Hire a fleet Captain, set up a training program, procure some sim time and put out an AE.
Delta already has all that, and it's in place and running today (except the AE, that is).

Unfortunately the pilots are on a separate list.
Old 05-24-2012 | 08:50 PM
  #101173  
Carl Spackler's Avatar
Back on TDY
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 12,487
Likes: 0
From: 747-400 Captain
Default

Originally Posted by LeineLodge
I completely agree with you. The Block Hour Ratios significantly shift flying back to mainline.
They will on the way up...but are legally unenforceable on the way down. If/when mainline flying drops, we (DALPA) will be in no legal position to demand this worthless language of forcing RJ airlines to reduce their block hours be enforced. The company flat won't do it, and tell us to grieve it later. The affected RJ airline certainly won't do it voluntarily, and would sue ALPA on a DFR if forced. That's the sad reality.

Carl
Old 05-24-2012 | 08:53 PM
  #101174  
newKnow's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2007
Posts: 6,844
Likes: 0
From: 765-A
Default

Originally Posted by slowplay
It was asked. The MEC looked at the numbers to try and make the operation cost-competitive on mainline. It would have been a horrendous B-scale. The one-time startup costs, pilot contract costs, and other related costs completely outstripped savings on the DCI margins. We even looked at adding seats into the aircraft that were capable of higher density, and there wasn't enough revenue to offset mainline expenses at our current costs (pre-TA).

Things are moving so fast, I almost missed this.

So, are you saying we could have had inroads into 70 seat flying, but someone determined the pay wasn't enough and mainline expenses were too high?

I wish they had sent that out in the TA. (Not trying to be flip. Seriously.)
Old 05-24-2012 | 08:54 PM
  #101175  
Carl Spackler's Avatar
Back on TDY
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 12,487
Likes: 0
From: 747-400 Captain
Default

Originally Posted by LeineLodge
I think I see where you're going here. Let's show how tough we are! . . . Then what?
That has nothing to do with negotiations. Negotiations are about knowing the process, and using it to your maximum advantage. Our MEC is saying YES to the very first offer before real section 6 negotiations even begins. How can you not see the problem there?

Do you not remember our MEC chairman begging us to give them a chance to show us all what a great job they can do with the first Section 6 negotiations that has occured on the property in over a decade? Is this it? Running from the table before Section 6 even begins and waving a victory flag?

Carl
Old 05-24-2012 | 08:57 PM
  #101176  
Boomer's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jan 2008
Posts: 4,629
Likes: 15
From: blueJet
Default

Originally Posted by johnso29
No it won't Carl. Do your math again.
The math largely depends on the timeframe.

Yes, the TA will reduce DCI seats for the short term (as 50s are parked early and 90s added). Looking long term, however, going from 255 to 325 large RJs will mean more DCI seats, since the 50s are being pulled down under either scenario.

The company is already thinking two moves ahead in this game, so perhaps you need to consider how many seats will be at DCI when you need to negotiate again?

You can call it the time value of seats.
Old 05-24-2012 | 08:57 PM
  #101177  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,539
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by newKnow
Things are moving so fast, I almost missed this.

So, are you saying we could have had inroads into 70 seat flying, but someone determined the pay wasn't enough and mainline expenses were too high?

I wish they had sent that out in the TA. (Not trying to be flip. Seriously.)
No, that's not what I'm saying. What I said was that we were not cost competitive for 76 seat flying (even worse for 70). There were no inroads available to make.
Old 05-24-2012 | 08:58 PM
  #101178  
Ragtop Day's Avatar
On Reserve
 
Joined: Apr 2010
Posts: 177
Likes: 1
From: B737 FO
Default

Originally Posted by johnso29
Carl, the current TA doesn't give one more seat or one more pound. It reduces seats and pounds.
What about the exception for 99,900 lb Delta Private Jets?
Old 05-24-2012 | 08:59 PM
  #101179  
forgot to bid's Avatar
veut gagner à la loterie
 
Joined: Apr 2008
Posts: 23,286
Likes: 0
From: Light Chop
Default

Originally Posted by Bucking Bar
Slow says the leases start to expire in 2014 & 2015. Is your question:
(1) The beginning of 2015
(2) The end of 2015
(3) What is the net difference whether we accept, or refuse, this TA?

I think the answer to #3 is probably fewer RJ's and certainly fewer seats outsourced without the TA.
I think #3 is right.

Originally Posted by alfaromeo
So you want to let them cut 737 and 767 flying while they add 717's? We included all domestic because we wanted to include all domestic. That's the point, they can't play hide the ball.
Cut the 737 and 767 out of the MBH : DBH ratio? Absolutely.

Run the ratio off the 717, MD88 (not the 90) and 752. If you did that after we had acquired the 188 new jets and they went to the 450 jet fleet the ratio would near 1.0. If we kept the 1.56 ratio they'd have to reduce from 450 aircraft to 283. So I think at a minimum we should have more airplanes here then there on an apples to apples CASM basis, i.e. better than 1.0 in our favor.

By tying that ratio to the bigger domestic jets they're able to increase that DCI fleet to the temporary 450 hard cap for now max.

I say all of that because if the CRJ-900 = Mainline CASM if not better, then we should only tie the block hours of those planes most threatened by the CRJ-900 only. Take out the 739, 763, 738, 90 and 753, and keep the ratio with the 752, MD88 and 717.

Hence the CRJ-900 ain't a 100 seat killer, it's David killing off Goliath.

Originally Posted by alfaromeo
I will go back to block hours. The very first input to determine line holders in the staffing formula is block hours. Not flight segments, ASM's, or any other metric. If you want to protect Delta pilot jobs, you want to protect as many as possible and you want to protect them with the key item that creates jobs. If we cut a 757 from JFK to LAX and replace it with an out and back in a 717 from ATL to SAV, you doubled the flight segments and cut the manning required by two thirds. Please go back and read the staffing formula and understand it. It is in Section 22 of your contract, I believe page 3 or 4.
My issue is as stated above, allowing the block hours from longer range domestic airplanes count in the calculation therein allowing the number of large RJs to swell and still meet the 1.56 ratio.

FWIW, played with the PBS staffing formula a few weeks ago. Would love to have the actual input data to play with. Had to guesstimate.

Originally Posted by alfaromeo
You didn't tell me what number you came up with in my math problem. No one else did either. I wonder why?

I answered your question. Just ran the numbers out using the fleet based off your 3.6M block hours and 53.9% belonging to mainline and let excel do the rest.

Sorry it took a few hours but hey, there is only so much time I have to fight for this pilot group here relying on information as it dribbles out and raise a family.
Old 05-24-2012 | 09:00 PM
  #101180  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,539
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by Carl Spackler
That is so disingenuous that it's nearly PURE BS. LEC resolutions have asked for this study many times and you unelected MEC bureaucrats have steadfastly refused.

Furthermore, negotiations is NOT about making us cost competitive with some bottom feeding regional. Negotiations is about first wanting something as the objective, then spending capital as necessary to make it happen. Unbelievable.

The FACT is that your MEC and sadly, MEC's before you DO NOT WANT this flying at mainline for whatever sick and twisted reason. Moak used to say that kind of flying was beneath the mainline pilot. I'm afraid that arrogant legacy lives on.

Carl
Maybe you better check with your reps again...

As I said, you can't handle the truth.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
On Autopilot
Regional
22617
11-05-2021 07:03 AM
AeroCrewSolut
Delta
153
08-14-2018 12:18 PM
Bill Lumberg
Major
71
06-13-2012 08:36 AM
Quagmire
Major
253
04-16-2011 06:19 AM
JiffyLube
Major
12
03-07-2008 04:27 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On


Thread Tools
Search this Thread
Your Privacy Choices