|
|
|
Originally Posted by boog123
(Post 1197684)
Where is the guarantee that the 88 "growth" airplanes won't be offset by parking Dc-9's, A319/320's and 757's. These are replacement planes.
Exactly right, all we've seen is Capacity Restraint and Reductions. The B717 will be the lowest paying a/c on the property. I don't buy the growth theory. |
Originally Posted by Roadie85
(Post 1197694)
Exactly right, all we've seen is Capacity Restraint and Reductions. The B717 will be the lowest paying a/c on the property. I don't buy the growth theory.
I don't either, just trying to show that to an extent we are giving up scope just to replace aircraft that have already been parked. Throw in the seemingly still open RAH loophole and this TA is unacceptable to me |
Originally Posted by Roadie85
(Post 1197694)
Exactly right, all we've seen is Capacity Restraint and Reductions. The B717 will be the lowest paying a/c on the property. I don't buy the growth theory.
|
|
|
Originally Posted by tsquare
(Post 1197448)
wow. There is none so blind as those that choose not to see.
|
Originally Posted by Bucking Bar
(Post 1197692)
Logbook! Carl |
Originally Posted by Carl Spackler
(Post 1197718)
Isn't that great?
Logbook! Carl Oh wait.... We don't say that. :) |
Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp
(Post 1197721)
Checked, ship number___.
Oh wait.... We don't say that. :) Carl |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:00 PM. |
|
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands