![]() |
|
Can someone pls answer, how many mainline jets are we down since the merger?
|
Originally Posted by forgot to bid
(Post 1197602)
So do we have to do that math equation again? How many pilots would we hire if we take the 717s?
0? Ive been hearing nobody can get a straight answer on the subject. Hopefully both the company and the union will post something on the matter before the vote given a seniority list integration and no definitive hiring will be a part of the 717 transaction. If this TA passes, the early retirements would offset the new efficiencies that they gain in the contract. So, we are where we are right now minus the fact that many of the guys slated to retire in the next 5 years just left on the early out. So, not too many retirements for several years due to the early outs. We are a bit fat right now (a SWAG). The first 20 or so 717's would replace DC9's. That takes us until the 2014 deliveries. So, they will make sure all the furlough bypass and mil leave guys come back if they want to, and then hire. I think if this TA passes, we still won't see hiring (or flows) until late 2013 (or later). Just my guess. |
There are 720 mainline jets as of May 22 and 599 at DCI. We were at 767 at the merger so we are down 47 airframes.
|
Originally Posted by Free Bird
(Post 1197623)
Can someone pls answer, how many mainline jets are we down since the merger?
|
Originally Posted by MoonShot
(Post 1197625)
My guess.
If this TA passes, the early retirements would offset the new efficiencies that they gain in the contract. So, we are where we are right now minus the fact that many of the guys slated to retire in the next 5 years just left on the early out. So, not too many retirements for several years due to the early outs. We are a bit fat right now (a SWAG). The first 20 or so 717's would replace DC9's. That takes us until the 2014 deliveries. So, they will make sure all the furlough bypass and mil leave guys come back if they want to, and then hire. I think if this TA passes, we still won't see hiring (or flows) until late 2013 (or later). Just my guess. So to get all of that "growth" we just need to give up large rj scope and establish a temporary 3 year new max cap of 325. |
Originally Posted by forgot to bid
(Post 1197640)
Makes sense to me.
So to get all of that "growth" we just need to give up large rj scope and establish a temporary 3 year new max cap of 325. |
Originally Posted by Carl Spackler
(Post 1197501)
Come on t, refute his points if you can. But don't call him blind.
Geez Carl |
mainline jets at time of merger 767
mainline jets today 720 difference -47 Proposed Narrowbody jets 88 - difference in parked mainline jets 47 growth mainline airframes 41 41 717's = 70 76 seaters Plus a hard cap of 450 DCI aircraft, until the next contract of course when the line in the sand can once again be moved. |
Originally Posted by Free Bird
(Post 1197675)
mainline jets at time of merger 767
mainline jets today 720 difference -47 Proposed Narrowbody jets 88 - difference in parked mainline jets 47 growth mainline airframes 41 41 717's = 70 76 seaters Plus a hard cap of 450 DCI aircraft, until the next contract of course when the line in the sand can once again be moved. |
Originally Posted by Free Bird
(Post 1197675)
mainline jets at time of merger 767
mainline jets today 720 difference -47 Proposed Narrowbody jets 88 - difference in parked mainline jets 47 growth mainline airframes 41 41 717's = 70 76 seaters Plus a hard cap of 450 DCI aircraft, until the next contract of course when the line in the sand can once again be moved. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:52 PM. |
|
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands