Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?
Gets Weekends Off
Joined: Feb 2008
Posts: 2,539
Likes: 0
As a thick-skinned ex-NWA guy, I really don't care that some of you guys always seem to bring up our history in a somewhat negative light -- as if we serve as an example of what not to do. I am more than willing to refute and defend the NWA pilot groups history. But, is this really part of the discussion you want to have, or are you just trying to jab us?
P.S. I think we did pretty good in 1998.
P.S. I think we did pretty good in 1998.
It is not my intent to bring up the strike in a negative light. It was my intent to show the results that two different strikes (yours and Spirit) produced.
You guys had no choice but to strike. You had a management team that thought they could "win". Your management team was very, very wrong. You guys did good.
Again, I'm not trying to poke a very honorable effort, but to put context into the discussion of those calling for a "fight." In 1998 your contract (and mine) was in a far different place than 4th in the industry with a TA that would take you to first.
Sorry that my post created the impression of an attack.
From what I hear, they're going professionally. Pretty good given the fact they're at the top of the pay heap and will be even after our TA is amendable. Really good considering SWAPA's scope.
NWA, FDX, UPS just to name a few. All of these have/had to fight really hard and even strike to get what was fair. Is this pilot group willing to fight such a fight? Is this pilot group even willing to say NO to a first offer? We already know our union bureauacracy can't do either.
Carl
Originally Posted by hockeypilot44;1195599.
It's the military guys that don't think for themselves that are going to vote this in.
I really don't understand the debate on this TA. In 2015, the 7er will pay $216. In 2004, the 7er paid 267. So 11 years later, it will pay $51 less (or 19% less). 11 years later!
Did anyone think we would have any chance of meaningful restoration without a fight?
If we have any hope of truly restoring this profession, we will have to go to the mattresses. Period. (It definitely won't come from a 2 month, Neville Chamberlin, peace in our time, TA.
This not an LOA/MOU. This is our 1st section 6 since BK. I would hope our goal would be significant (i.e., large) gains in all areas of the contract.
I for one, am not ready to throw the towel in on this profession. I hope that the majority agrees.
Did anyone think we would have any chance of meaningful restoration without a fight?
If we have any hope of truly restoring this profession, we will have to go to the mattresses. Period. (It definitely won't come from a 2 month, Neville Chamberlin, peace in our time, TA.
This not an LOA/MOU. This is our 1st section 6 since BK. I would hope our goal would be significant (i.e., large) gains in all areas of the contract.
I for one, am not ready to throw the towel in on this profession. I hope that the majority agrees.
Carl
It was mostly military guys who got us c2k rates. One strike committee guy I remember was ex AFA. Psych major. I don't think anybody could ever get inside his head-- very smart and determined.
No you're not. The wording of your very own sentence proves it. You don't know what the results are until after the fight. What you're really saying is that you'd NEVER fight...because you can't know what the results of that fight would be.
But you don't need to worry about fighting anyway. This contract doesn't apply to you MEC bureaucrats who get the 92 hours of FPL on the highest equipment you can hold. I know you just don't get why anyone would fight over somethng as good as you have it.
Carl
Carl
Hey folks, don't get distracted and get into the FDAL vs. FNWA or Military vs. Civilian. We are all one despite our backgrounds. If we don't get this right, all of the contracts of the past will seem like the glory days. Let's get this profession moving forward, time to change the trend line.
Yes. They represent management. They're OK if members also get represented assuming members wishes align with management, but that's secondary. Look at how hard slowplay and alfaromeo are trying to get us to see this TA through the eyes of management. Look at how slowplay and alfaromeo says thngs like: 'this is as far management would go' and 'I promise you they will not move from this position if we vote NO.' I ask any objective participant, who does DALPA sound like they're representing?
We don't know. Some LEC reps are saying it clearly did not. The others are silent. No rep that I know of is saying that this TA met the will of the pilot group as stated by the survey. But since we won't get to see the survey...
Absolutely no chance. You're not even going to get to see the DCI contracts or any of that critical scope paperwork prior to the vote.
Carl
We don't know. Some LEC reps are saying it clearly did not. The others are silent. No rep that I know of is saying that this TA met the will of the pilot group as stated by the survey. But since we won't get to see the survey...
Absolutely no chance. You're not even going to get to see the DCI contracts or any of that critical scope paperwork prior to the vote.
Carl
Question ...
RA on said on his weekly message that we are moving into Phase II of the LGA expansion. He mentioned that initially many of the destinations were started with DCI aircraft. Now that the process has matured, we are up gauging the routes to mainline aircraft. He said to check DLNET to see the changes.
Where on DLNET is this? Is he meaning going to TravelNet to view the changes? Or is there a listing of all of the equipment changes on DLNET? I've scoured the website and couldn't find anything.
Thanks ...
RA on said on his weekly message that we are moving into Phase II of the LGA expansion. He mentioned that initially many of the destinations were started with DCI aircraft. Now that the process has matured, we are up gauging the routes to mainline aircraft. He said to check DLNET to see the changes.
Where on DLNET is this? Is he meaning going to TravelNet to view the changes? Or is there a listing of all of the equipment changes on DLNET? I've scoured the website and couldn't find anything.
Thanks ...
Delta Continues New York Growth with Expanded Caribbean, Bermuda, Florida Service
Airline adds new and expanded flights to 10 popular destinations from LaGuardia, JFK
May 21, 2012
NEW YORK, May 21, 2012 /PRNewswire/ -- Delta Air Lines (NYSE: DAL) today announced new and expanded service to 10 popular destinations in the Caribbean, Bermuda and Florida from LaGuardia Airport and John F. Kennedy International Airport, continuing its historic expansion in New York.
The new flights, which will begin in late 2012 and early 2013, are in addition to Delta's previously announced expansion at New York-LaGuardia, where the airline is adding more than 100 new flights to 26 new destinations this summer. When its full schedule is implemented, Delta will operate more than 260 daily flights between LaGuardia and more than 60 cities, exceeding any other carrier.
Delta also is optimizing its schedule at JFK to facilitate convenient connections to international flights. JFK is a major global gateway for Delta, which operates nonstop flights to more than 45 international destinations from the airport.
"We're excited to be announcing new and expanded service to these popular leisure destinations at the same time we're building our new domestic hub at LaGuardia Airport," said Gail Grimmett, Delta's senior vice president – New York. "It's another step toward achieving our goal of becoming the preferred airline in New York."
In conjunction with its expansion at LaGuardia, Delta is investing $160 million to modernize two terminals at the airport and construct a new walkway connecting the facilities. At JFK, Delta is currently under way on a $1.2 billion program to enhance and expand Terminal 4, adding nine new gates and creating a state-of-the-art gateway for New York's fastest growing global airline. That facility will open in spring 2013.
New and expanded service to the Caribbean and Bermuda includes:
New daily year-round service between LaGuardia and Bermuda.
New Saturday flights between JFK and St. Maarten.*
LaGuardia-Nassau flights will be expanded from seasonal to year-round service.
JFK-Montego Bay, Jamaica, flights will grow from Saturday seasonal to daily service.
JFK-Aruba service will increase from Saturday seasonal flights to daily year-round service.
JFK-Punta Cana, Dominican Republic, flights will expand from Saturday seasonal to daily year-round service.
New and expanded service to Florida includes:
Two new flights between LaGuardia and Sarasota, Fla.
A new flight between JFK and Fort Myers, Fla.
A fourth daily flight between LaGuardia and Fort Myers.
A fifth daily flight between LaGuardia and Miami.
A fifth daily flight between LaGuardia and Tampa.
A second daily flight between JFK and Tampa.
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post




