|
|
Originally Posted by boog123
(Post 1212612)
If this contract is such a slam dunk, then why aren't all the reps just falling all over themselves to tell us to vote yes? Why wall street screaming that we are getting paid too much? Why aren't the DCI pilots filing injunctions due to scope givebacks?
My prediction: In 3 years, a lot less DAL pilots, stagnation, w2's near what they are today for most pilots and a lot of "we didn't think they would do that" |
Originally Posted by boog123
(Post 1212612)
If this contract is such a slam dunk, then why aren't all the reps just falling all over themselves to tell us to vote yes? Why wall street screaming that we are getting paid too much? Why aren't the DCI pilots filing injunctions due to scope givebacks?
My prediction: In 3 years, a lot less DAL pilots, stagnation, w2's near what they are today for most pilots and a lot of "we didn't think they would do that" Again, dispute my math if you can. How does that result in similar w2's? I see a 5 year 88 FO making nearly 25k more/year using the assumptions I listed above. Bigger aircraft/seats will see similar or better results. Reserve pilots benefit even more. How does voting NO provide for more (not just talking about $)? |
Originally Posted by boog123
(Post 1212612)
If this contract is such a slam dunk, then why aren't all the reps just falling all over themselves to tell us to vote yes? Why wall street screaming that we are getting paid too much? Why aren't the DCI pilots filing injunctions due to scope givebacks?
My prediction: In 3 years, a lot less DAL pilots, stagnation, w2's near what they are today for most pilots and a lot of "we didn't think they would do that" They aren't falling all over themselves because too many clowns would be accusing them of a sell job. Man there are way too many children posting on this site... |
Originally Posted by johnso29
(Post 1212618)
Why? Put some facts to your prediction. Tell people how you've come to this, and you may sway people to a NO vote.
Sorry, vote how you want. |
Originally Posted by CVG767A
(Post 1212285)
The incident he's talking about was in 1998. The article you've cited is unrelated.
|
Originally Posted by tsquare
(Post 1212628)
They aren't falling all over themselves because too many clowns would be accusing them of a sell job.
|
Originally Posted by boog123
(Post 1212634)
Too late for that.
Yup.. clowns and children.. It is truly a shame that their votes count same as a rational adult's do. |
I just want to say something... I flew an MD-90 yesterday with a bi-folding first class lav door.
I told everyone here at the house. http://deadhomersociety.files.wordpr...akesthree3.png Nobody cared. Someone needs to share in my joy. |
Originally Posted by tsquare
(Post 1212651)
Yup.. clowns and children.. It is truly a shame that their votes count same as a rational adult's do.
|
Originally Posted by CVG767A
(Post 1212549)
It's fairly obvious that, before the merger, the Delta guys and the Northwest guys had a radically different approach to labor relations. Despite that, it doesn't seem like we had radically different contracts. It's tough to make the case that one approach is more effective than the other.
Carl |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:54 PM. |
|
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands