![]() |
|
Originally Posted by tsquare
(Post 1227474)
We will be negotiating a new contract in 2015... what's your point?
TEN |
Originally Posted by tsquare
(Post 1227474)
We will be negotiating a new contract in 2015... what's your point?
Aahhh, and there it is folks. The old "we'll get em next time." |
Originally Posted by Superdad
(Post 1227518)
Aahhh, and there it is folks. The old "we'll get em next time."
|
Originally Posted by Superdad
(Post 1227518)
Aahhh, and there it is folks. The old "we'll get em next time."
T was merely pointing out that the current PWA will be opened in April of 2015, and with almost 20% higher rates, better work rules and rigs, more pay for vac/trng. It is great to get all that upfront instead of waiting for 2-3 years and hoping for a retro check, and then being able to pile even more value into the PWA rather than just wrapping up the first deal. That blurb by Zack's was just a piece of analyst garbage anyway, mixing lots of different info but not saying anything useful or accurate... Gotta do something to justify the boss keeping them on payroll. |
Originally Posted by FIIGMO
(Post 1227521)
yep DPA would have done better!
Not trying to stir up issues over this, but where do they go from here? |
Originally Posted by Superdad
(Post 1227518)
Aahhh, and there it is folks. The old "we'll get em next time."
Call it what you want, but fact is that this agreement is amendable in 2015. And I prefer "We'll get MORE next time"... but whatever makes you happy. |
Originally Posted by Jughead
(Post 1227544)
Hey that brings up an interesting point - what becomes of the DPA now that we have a new contract? Are they still lurking in the shadows, soliciting donations? Will they re-emerge in 2015 with new bag tags?
Not trying to stir up issues over this, but where do they go from here? |
Originally Posted by shiznit
(Post 1227526)
I think you meant to say: "We'll be able to get even more next time since we already got a solid improvement this time."
I guess "solid improvements" are in the eye of the beholder. |
Originally Posted by Free Bird
(Post 1227577)
Higher ALV = less pilots required. How many fewer pilots do you want on the seniority list?
I guess "solid improvements" are in the eye of the beholder. Can you point to any pilot groups that have above average pay by feather bedding? |
Originally Posted by forgot to bid
(Post 1227469)
The one benefit of a 22.5 year old MD-88, it's harder to get the birds into the front hole where the engine thingy spins around and around.
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:14 AM. |
|
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands