![]() |
|
Originally Posted by Sink r8
(Post 1258064)
If you find him tiresome, ignore him.
I do agree on term limits, and more importantly, I'd like contractual language barring union officers from crossing to a Company function other than LCP or instructor, for some lengthy period, i.e. 5 years. And vice-versa. I'm trying to follow the substance of the didcussion, to follow, but this is pretty much drowning into personality issues, and not too issue-based. I agree to your point on joint roles. I don't think pilots should make a career of anything other than being a pilot. Too many in our ranks are career MGT or union. We can't control MGT but we can control the stipulations of who and for how long a pilot can work for us. |
Originally Posted by Columbia
(Post 1258065)
College fb Saturday! Who is embry riddle playing?
No, wait, that's next week's game...:rolleyes: |
Originally Posted by Timbo
(Post 1258091)
Auburn, and Auburn LOST! No, wait, that's next week's game...:rolleyes: |
I love greenslip, er, football season.
|
Originally Posted by slowplay
(Post 1258079)
A Jesse post without underboob? What a waste.
See my reply to FtB... Oh, how's that popularly elected Federal Deficit doing? Partisanship and pandering a problem? The US Government is your model of business efficiency? Can you show me a business in which the shareowners elect the Board, CEO, and management team? We're not talking about the power to make war, print money or change what is defined as "human rights." We're talking about doing the business (read economics) of the Delta pilots. Our governance structure supports that better than any of the alternatives (APA direct election/Teamster's Business agent, etc.) that I've seen. Not looking for a big argument here, just giving you an example where the people who are represented actually vote on their representation. I happen to think it's a more appropriate example since voters pay taxes to the government as we pay dues to our union. You don't see IBM employees paying dues to IBM; businesses pay their employees, not the other way around. |
with the innovative minds at DAL thinking outside the box ....ie oil refinery. Now I know why DAL hires FAs with cat farms.
http://thechive.files.wordpress.com/...2603o1_250.gif |
Originally Posted by mmaviator
(Post 1258098)
with the innovative minds at DAL thinking outside the box ....ie oil refinery. Now I know why DAL hires FAs with cat farms.
|
Its football Saturday and that last page was a personal foul.
Oversized jpg's are a 15 yard penalty. http://www.scavengeinc.com/images/Pr...stume-1426.jpg |
Originally Posted by slowplay
(Post 1258079)
A Jesse post without underboob? What a waste.
See my reply to FtB... Oh, how's that popularly elected Federal Deficit doing? Partisanship and pandering a problem? The US Government is your model of business efficiency? Can you show me a business in which the shareowners elect the Board, CEO, and management team? We're not talking about the power to make war, print money or change what is defined as "human rights." We're talking about doing the business (read economics) of the Delta pilots. Our governance structure supports that better than any of the alternatives (APA direct election/Teamster's Business agent, etc.) that I've seen. |
Originally Posted by shiznit
(Post 1258050)
No kidding. I'm not opposed or in favor of an idea like that, it would depend on the reasons.
I am not sure how a representational election versus a general election is better or worse for the membership. I'm all for improving how the union functions, but I'm not in favor of change just for the sake of change. I do know that my rep is much better informed on the greater issues that are facing the piloting profession, who out there has been doing yeoman's work to improve the union, and also who has the best leadership and management skills to run an organization this size in the most effective manner. I have had many discussion with people for and against that change. Both make compelling arguments and broadened my horizons on the issue. Having that debate on a larger scale is not a bad thing. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:32 AM. |
|
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands