Airline Pilot Central Forums

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   Delta (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/delta/)
-   -   Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/delta/36912-any-latest-greatest-about-delta.html)

DAWGS 09-08-2012 01:38 PM


Originally Posted by Sink r8 (Post 1258064)
If you find him tiresome, ignore him.

I do agree on term limits, and more importantly, I'd like contractual language barring union officers from crossing to a Company function other than LCP or instructor, for some lengthy period, i.e. 5 years. And vice-versa.

I'm trying to follow the substance of the didcussion, to follow, but this is pretty much drowning into personality issues, and not too issue-based.

I don't ignore..I like different points of view, however he was just dragging out a moot point for pages. It's done...yes carried the TA. Maybe he is a union type and had to take alot of crap and he wants to give some back to 80. I don't know, but I do know it's not constructive and it wastes time for all of us who follow this thread. Just pointing it out to 76drvr.

I agree to your point on joint roles. I don't think pilots should make a career of anything other than being a pilot. Too many in our ranks are career MGT or union. We can't control MGT but we can control the stipulations of who and for how long a pilot can work for us.

Timbo 09-08-2012 01:41 PM


Originally Posted by Columbia (Post 1258065)
College fb Saturday! Who is embry riddle playing?

Auburn, and Auburn LOST!

No, wait, that's next week's game...:rolleyes:

BTpilot 09-08-2012 01:47 PM


Originally Posted by Timbo (Post 1258091)

Auburn, and Auburn LOST!

No, wait, that's next week's game...:rolleyes:

Seriously AU lost to MISS STATE.. Embarrassed alumnus :(

dalad 09-08-2012 01:49 PM

I love greenslip, er, football season.

Jesse 09-08-2012 01:55 PM


Originally Posted by slowplay (Post 1258079)
A Jesse post without underboob? What a waste.

See my reply to FtB...

Oh, how's that popularly elected Federal Deficit doing? Partisanship and pandering a problem? The US Government is your model of business efficiency? Can you show me a business in which the shareowners elect the Board, CEO, and management team?

We're not talking about the power to make war, print money or change what is defined as "human rights." We're talking about doing the business (read economics) of the Delta pilots. Our governance structure supports that better than any of the alternatives (APA direct election/Teamster's Business agent, etc.) that I've seen.

Slow, I anticipated your expected response so that's why I included the USSR. It wasn't so I could say, "Well, the USA (whose members vote for their leaders, top to bottom) is still around and a super power, whereas the USSR (whose members didn't get to vote) is no longer in existence." I put both there to help you consider bringing up strawman arguments. But you went there anyway. You simply asked for an example where an organization elects its own CEO, etc. Actually, you said business organization. So if you think of ALPA as a business then you should be able to concede the government functions as a business in a similar enough fashion when it comes to representation.

Not looking for a big argument here, just giving you an example where the people who are represented actually vote on their representation. I happen to think it's a more appropriate example since voters pay taxes to the government as we pay dues to our union. You don't see IBM employees paying dues to IBM; businesses pay their employees, not the other way around.

mmaviator 09-08-2012 01:58 PM

with the innovative minds at DAL thinking outside the box ....ie oil refinery. Now I know why DAL hires FAs with cat farms.


http://thechive.files.wordpress.com/...2603o1_250.gif

Sink r8 09-08-2012 02:21 PM


Originally Posted by mmaviator (Post 1258098)
with the innovative minds at DAL thinking outside the box ....ie oil refinery. Now I know why DAL hires FAs with cat farms.

You just can't get them to think outside the litter box.

Check Essential 09-08-2012 02:36 PM

Its football Saturday and that last page was a personal foul.
Oversized jpg's are a 15 yard penalty.

http://www.scavengeinc.com/images/Pr...stume-1426.jpg

TANSTAAFL 09-08-2012 02:42 PM


Originally Posted by slowplay (Post 1258079)
A Jesse post without underboob? What a waste.

See my reply to FtB...

Oh, how's that popularly elected Federal Deficit doing? Partisanship and pandering a problem? The US Government is your model of business efficiency? Can you show me a business in which the shareowners elect the Board, CEO, and management team?

We're not talking about the power to make war, print money or change what is defined as "human rights." We're talking about doing the business (read economics) of the Delta pilots. Our governance structure supports that better than any of the alternatives (APA direct election/Teamster's Business agent, etc.) that I've seen.

I find your point a little unclear - you seem to defend and ridicule the current system of electing union officiols at the same time. MEC officers have always been elected by the Reps, but Reps by the pilots at large. Are you suggesting you do not favor this system, or it is not the best form of democratic governance? What would you do if you were king?

acl65pilot 09-08-2012 03:01 PM


Originally Posted by shiznit (Post 1258050)
No kidding. I'm not opposed or in favor of an idea like that, it would depend on the reasons.

I am not sure how a representational election versus a general election is better or worse for the membership. I'm all for improving how the union functions, but I'm not in favor of change just for the sake of change.


I do know that my rep is much better informed on the greater issues that are facing the piloting profession, who out there has been doing yeoman's work to improve the union, and also who has the best leadership and management skills to run an organization this size in the most effective manner.


I have had many discussion with people for and against that change. Both make compelling arguments and broadened my horizons on the issue. Having that debate on a larger scale is not a bad thing.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 06:32 AM.


Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands