Airline Pilot Central Forums

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   Delta (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/delta/)
-   -   Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/delta/36912-any-latest-greatest-about-delta.html)

Justdoinmyjob 07-28-2009 11:25 AM


Originally Posted by acl65pilot (Post 652093)
Fact is that it is the CA switch, and never forget it. Just do what he tells you to do. Works well here on the southern front. ;)

You've apparently never flown the 737. When I flew it, not one captain ever touched the switch.:cool:

iaflyer 07-28-2009 11:28 AM

Hmmm. I can enter into ICrew a displacement/AE for the following:

DTW: DC9, 320, 330 or 744
MSP: DC9, 320, 330
MEM: DC9, 320

But no 757 (or 767) or 7ER.

I think Delta-N has 757s based in MSP and DTW now. Are they hiding what they are doing with the 757 until the AE is published?

iaflyer 07-28-2009 11:29 AM


Originally Posted by acl65pilot (Post 652111)
I hear ya.

Might get some added routes out of the Republic of Texas though.

Don't give the DFW commuters any ideas - they are as bad as BOS!

acl65pilot 07-28-2009 11:30 AM


Originally Posted by Justdoinmyjob (Post 652112)
You've apparently never flown the 737. When I flew it, not one captain ever touched the switch.:cool:

My statement is not aircraft specific.

If he is a LCA it is when the aircraft is cleared to push to the completion of the shutdown checklist.

With the line guys, it is however they want it done. My point was if they wants it on early, that is their call, if they don't, I do not flip it. If they keep it on after shutdown, that is his/her call,, if they do not, it is their call as well. IE the philosophy if spelled out in the FOM, but as a CA with CA Authority it is right to change that, and I am not going to reinvent the wheel, or prove that yes, a wheel is in fact round.

Like I said, do it however he/ she wants it done.

acl65pilot 07-28-2009 11:33 AM


Originally Posted by iaflyer (Post 652117)
Hmmm. I can enter into ICrew a displacement/AE for the following:

DTW: DC9, 320, 330 or 744
MSP: DC9, 320, 330
MEM: DC9, 320

But no 757 (or 767) or 7ER.

I think Delta-N has 757s based in MSP and DTW now. Are they hiding what they are doing with the 757 until the AE is published?

Just for grins and since it appears that you are quite board, go in and try to put in ATL DC9B. Yep, probably cannot get that either. They have not activated any of the cross base/ fleet stuff yet.

Like I stated this AM, it looked as though they were going to do this. Fact is that they can change their mind up to the second they hit publish.

acl65pilot 07-28-2009 11:33 AM


Originally Posted by iaflyer (Post 652118)
Don't give the DFW commuters any ideas - they are as bad as BOS!

Do not talk to the station manager in DFW then!

Justdoinmyjob 07-28-2009 11:37 AM


Originally Posted by acl65pilot (Post 652119)
Like I said, do it however he/ she wants it done.

While I agree with your philosophy about how it's done, keep in mind that the company has gone after BOTH pilots in a few instances where the FOM policy wasn't followed. The intention was that the FO should have brought to the captain's attention the deviation from policy, and by not doing so, was complicant in violating said policy.

iaflyer 07-28-2009 11:37 AM


Originally Posted by acl65pilot (Post 652121)
Just for grins and since it appears that you are quite board, go in and try to put in ATL DC9B. Yep, probably cannot get that either. They have not activated any of the cross base/ fleet stuff yet.

True - and ATL DC9 says, "EQUIPMENT NO LONGER VALID FOR BASE" while a ATL330 says, EQUIPMENT INVALID FOR BASE. Guess that's left over from when DAL flew the DC9.

Can't pick any DAL equipment in NWA bases either (like DTW777). Just trying to make my crystal ball work better.

Cycle Pilot 07-28-2009 11:41 AM

As far as the beacon in the 737 and MD-88, I turn it on per the S.O.P. (cleared/ready to push) until the Captain I'm flying with directs me otherwise. It makes life easy. I'm not a mind reader.

acl65pilot 07-28-2009 11:42 AM


Originally Posted by Justdoinmyjob (Post 652123)
While I agree with your philosophy about how it's done, keep in mind that the company has gone after BOTH pilots in a few instances where the FOM policy wasn't followed. The intention was that the FO should have brought to the captain's attention the deviation from policy, and by not doing so, was complacent in violating said policy.

I totally agree, but as I stated it is his authority. And they did not go after guys turning it on. They went after guys that pulled a circuit breaker, which per FOM policy was the issue.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 12:24 PM.


Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands