Airline Pilot Central Forums

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   Delta (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/delta/)
-   -   Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/delta/36912-any-latest-greatest-about-delta.html)

80ktsClamp 11-12-2012 01:51 PM

Can't remember if I posted this or not... but... wow! It's amazing there were only minor injuries.


tsquare 11-12-2012 01:59 PM


Originally Posted by dalad (Post 1291265)
Would Kirby Smart go to UT or AU? How about some of those coaches running pretty good programs in the MAC?

I don't think UT is gonna be able to afford to hire another mid major coach with "promise". They are gonna have to back the dumptruck full o'money up to somebody's house and get someone that can win tomorrow.. not 3 years from tomorrow. Bobby Petrino with all the baggage he has, might be such a name. Personally I like Charlie Strong even though he has that gator DNA, but he can win, and he can recruit south Florida. There is a lot of talk about Jon Gruden, but I hope that is just rumor because the NFL will call and he be gone leaving another train wreck in his wake. I liked Dooley, but unfortunately he was our Mike Shula. WE need a true college coach like Saban or Chip Kelly.

But as so many of my UK friends are so fond of saying "I can hardly wait till basketball season"!

Boomer 11-12-2012 01:59 PM


Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp (Post 1291531)
Can't remember if I posted this or not... but... wow! It's amazing there were only minor injuries.


All I could make out was blah blah three people blah blah ATC blah pilot error blah blah.

It looked like Lexington, but without the tree.

FIIGMO 11-12-2012 02:02 PM


Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp (Post 1291531)
Can't remember if I posted this or not... but... wow! It's amazing there were only minor injuries.


looks my landings in the 800 just that they came up short on runway length!!

georgetg 11-12-2012 02:06 PM


Originally Posted by iaflyer (Post 1291518)
Right now (unless it changed in C2012, and I don't think it did) new hire pilots >at Delta< who are in training, only get hotel for the first two weeks, lower pay and no per diem. So - lets first take care of our gals/guys before we get things for people in training at other airlines.

If I had a preference, I would pick first to provide a hotel, then per diem then regular pay for new hires at Delta.

two separate issues:

First:
ANA Lufthansa train their own non-pilot newhires because of lack of a qualified rated pilot applicant pool in their home countries and because they view ab-initio pilot training as an integral part of their respective flight standards/training department.

Should Delta experience a qualified rated pilot shortage here in the US it would be a corporate decision to make ab-initio training an integral part of the flight standards/training department. Our contract makes no provisions for requiring training by Delta so it's highly unlikely Delta would ever bring ab-initio training directly under the purview of Delta Air Lines. Most likely it would be an offshoot of DGS if that....

Once that decision is made it would be up to DALPA to negotiate the work rules/conditions pay/benefits for the non-rated pilot newhires, or to require seniority list instructors for newhires. IMHO it's highly unlikely we would ever see either.

Second:
I agree.
A Delta pilot is a Delta pilot is a Delta pilot.
Seniority sorts out everything else.
Every Delta pilot should be afforded a hotel in training because it's the right thing to do.

Cheers
George

johnso29 11-12-2012 02:07 PM


Originally Posted by Sink r8 (Post 1291510)
Exactly. As it was intelligently pointed out by another poster, these articles aren't random. Delta's safety guy was quoted. That didn't happen without permission, did it? Like you, I understand the article to be an argument, not an innocent anectdote.

Bottom line is that we're not reaching "Peak" pilot production, as was rumored for oil. We've just run out of very cheap pilots to procure. I'm just not 100% sure how to make sure this translates into gains for pilots already married to their airline.

This could be the turning point for outsourcing. Regional airlines already run on very thin profit margins, and the new rules will make them much less efficient. This will require more pilots, but they can't find qualified pilots now. The regional managers are screaming murder right now, and you see several quoted in the article.

Boomer 11-12-2012 02:10 PM

Johnso,

Your post count is 9,777.

Is that also your bidding preference? :D

Sink r8 11-12-2012 02:44 PM


Originally Posted by Boomer (Post 1291523)
I would think that precedent has been established by Comair Aviation Academy / Delta Connection Academy. For more than a decade, the Delta name and logo (as well as Delta pilots) endorsed that program.

Delta could set up any deal they want with a school and/or student, and unless the DALPA contract states that an ALPA pilot shall have final say in any hiring decision, "poof!" instant Delta new-hire pilot.

Or am I missing something?

Right. The facility might already exist, but not the sort of arrangement I was thinking about. There wasn't a relationship where a) Delta paid tuition, and b) the student was committed to Delta.

I'm not suggesting ALPA endorses condidates, but I'm asking whether a person that was training under an ab-initio relationship would be a new-hire, just as for ANA. If such person is covered, and I supect labor law and our contract would make sure they're covered, then we have leverage.

PilotFrog 11-12-2012 02:47 PM

For those using Chrome and want to get rid of the personalized ads, you can now click the Do not Track option.
Settings, Show Advanced Settings, Privacy, click on the box next to Do Not Track.
It might work and might not.
To get rid of ads all together, search for an extension called AdBlock

For those of you on the iPad, SOL as far as I know.

Bucking Bar 11-12-2012 02:48 PM


Originally Posted by georgetg (Post 1291541)
two separate issues:

First:
ANA Lufthansa train their own non-pilot newhires because of lack of a qualified rated pilot applicant pool in their home countries and because they view ab-initio pilot training as an integral part of their respective flight standards/training department.

Should Delta experience a qualified rated pilot shortage here in the US it would be a corporate decision to make ab-initio training an integral part of the flight standards/training department. Our contract makes no provisions for requiring training by Delta so it's highly unlikely Delta would ever bring ab-initio training directly under the purview of Delta Air Lines. Most likely it would be an offshoot of DGS if that....

Once that decision is made it would be up to DALPA to negotiate the work rules/conditions pay/benefits for the non-rated pilot newhires, or to require seniority list instructors for newhires. IMHO it's highly unlikely we would ever see either.

Second:
I agree.
A Delta pilot is a Delta pilot is a Delta pilot.
Seniority sorts out everything else.
Every Delta pilot should be afforded a hotel in training because it's the right thing to do.

Cheers
George

George,

I agree, but it will never happen.

We have roughly 5,000+ qualified pilots flying Delta passengers today. 350 of them were already represented by our MEC. Our MEC voted them out of our representative structure.

If we are unwilling to represent the Compass pilots, there aint no way Moak's regime is going to try to represent ab initio guys. ALPA did not list scope, or unity, as a priority in the strategic goals set by our BOD.

Disappointing ...

... anyway. Delta will never have a pilot shortage. We pay pretty well ... . US Air, Virgin, Spirit, Allegiant are going to have to pay more to get applicants.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:15 AM.


Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands