![]() |
|
Can't remember if I posted this or not... but... wow! It's amazing there were only minor injuries.
|
Originally Posted by dalad
(Post 1291265)
Would Kirby Smart go to UT or AU? How about some of those coaches running pretty good programs in the MAC?
But as so many of my UK friends are so fond of saying "I can hardly wait till basketball season"! |
Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp
(Post 1291531)
Can't remember if I posted this or not... but... wow! It's amazing there were only minor injuries.
It looked like Lexington, but without the tree. |
Originally Posted by 80ktsClamp
(Post 1291531)
Can't remember if I posted this or not... but... wow! It's amazing there were only minor injuries.
|
Originally Posted by iaflyer
(Post 1291518)
Right now (unless it changed in C2012, and I don't think it did) new hire pilots >at Delta< who are in training, only get hotel for the first two weeks, lower pay and no per diem. So - lets first take care of our gals/guys before we get things for people in training at other airlines.
If I had a preference, I would pick first to provide a hotel, then per diem then regular pay for new hires at Delta. First: ANA Lufthansa train their own non-pilot newhires because of lack of a qualified rated pilot applicant pool in their home countries and because they view ab-initio pilot training as an integral part of their respective flight standards/training department. Should Delta experience a qualified rated pilot shortage here in the US it would be a corporate decision to make ab-initio training an integral part of the flight standards/training department. Our contract makes no provisions for requiring training by Delta so it's highly unlikely Delta would ever bring ab-initio training directly under the purview of Delta Air Lines. Most likely it would be an offshoot of DGS if that.... Once that decision is made it would be up to DALPA to negotiate the work rules/conditions pay/benefits for the non-rated pilot newhires, or to require seniority list instructors for newhires. IMHO it's highly unlikely we would ever see either. Second: I agree. A Delta pilot is a Delta pilot is a Delta pilot. Seniority sorts out everything else. Every Delta pilot should be afforded a hotel in training because it's the right thing to do. Cheers George |
Originally Posted by Sink r8
(Post 1291510)
Exactly. As it was intelligently pointed out by another poster, these articles aren't random. Delta's safety guy was quoted. That didn't happen without permission, did it? Like you, I understand the article to be an argument, not an innocent anectdote.
Bottom line is that we're not reaching "Peak" pilot production, as was rumored for oil. We've just run out of very cheap pilots to procure. I'm just not 100% sure how to make sure this translates into gains for pilots already married to their airline. |
Johnso,
Your post count is 9,777. Is that also your bidding preference? :D |
Originally Posted by Boomer
(Post 1291523)
I would think that precedent has been established by Comair Aviation Academy / Delta Connection Academy. For more than a decade, the Delta name and logo (as well as Delta pilots) endorsed that program.
Delta could set up any deal they want with a school and/or student, and unless the DALPA contract states that an ALPA pilot shall have final say in any hiring decision, "poof!" instant Delta new-hire pilot. Or am I missing something? I'm not suggesting ALPA endorses condidates, but I'm asking whether a person that was training under an ab-initio relationship would be a new-hire, just as for ANA. If such person is covered, and I supect labor law and our contract would make sure they're covered, then we have leverage. |
For those using Chrome and want to get rid of the personalized ads, you can now click the Do not Track option.
Settings, Show Advanced Settings, Privacy, click on the box next to Do Not Track. It might work and might not. To get rid of ads all together, search for an extension called AdBlock For those of you on the iPad, SOL as far as I know. |
Originally Posted by georgetg
(Post 1291541)
two separate issues:
First: ANA Lufthansa train their own non-pilot newhires because of lack of a qualified rated pilot applicant pool in their home countries and because they view ab-initio pilot training as an integral part of their respective flight standards/training department. Should Delta experience a qualified rated pilot shortage here in the US it would be a corporate decision to make ab-initio training an integral part of the flight standards/training department. Our contract makes no provisions for requiring training by Delta so it's highly unlikely Delta would ever bring ab-initio training directly under the purview of Delta Air Lines. Most likely it would be an offshoot of DGS if that.... Once that decision is made it would be up to DALPA to negotiate the work rules/conditions pay/benefits for the non-rated pilot newhires, or to require seniority list instructors for newhires. IMHO it's highly unlikely we would ever see either. Second: I agree. A Delta pilot is a Delta pilot is a Delta pilot. Seniority sorts out everything else. Every Delta pilot should be afforded a hotel in training because it's the right thing to do. Cheers George I agree, but it will never happen. We have roughly 5,000+ qualified pilots flying Delta passengers today. 350 of them were already represented by our MEC. Our MEC voted them out of our representative structure. If we are unwilling to represent the Compass pilots, there aint no way Moak's regime is going to try to represent ab initio guys. ALPA did not list scope, or unity, as a priority in the strategic goals set by our BOD. Disappointing ... ... anyway. Delta will never have a pilot shortage. We pay pretty well ... . US Air, Virgin, Spirit, Allegiant are going to have to pay more to get applicants. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:15 AM. |
|
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands