![]() |
|
Originally Posted by Bucking Bar
(Post 1291557)
George,
I agree, but it will never happen. We have roughly 5,000+ qualified pilots flying Delta passengers today. 350 of them were already represented by our MEC. Our MEC voted them out of our representative structure. If we are unwilling to represent the Compass pilots, there aint no way Moak's regime is going to try to represent ab initio guys. ALPA did not list scope, or unity, as a priority in the strategic goals set by our BOD. Disappointing ... |
Originally Posted by cni187
(Post 1291486)
Lufthansa trains its own pilots. When I lived in Germany I dated a girl who was going to take their test and apply. She said they take people with no experience at all and train them.
|
Originally Posted by georgetg
(Post 1291541)
two separate issues:
First: ANA Lufthansa train their own non-pilot newhires because of lack of a qualified rated pilot applicant pool in their home countries and because they view ab-initio pilot training as an integral part of their respective flight standards/training department. Have a friend of the family who flew for the BundesLuftwaffe. A320 pilot flying their version of SAM aircraft. Got out and turned down by Lufthansa. They want to train their new-hires from the ground up. Not saying it's right or wrong.. but to say that there are no home grown pilots in Germany is not true. Motch |
Originally Posted by Sink r8
(Post 1291555)
Right. The facility might already exist, but not the sort of arrangement I was thinking about. There wasn't a relationship where a) Delta paid tuition, and b) the student was committed to Delta.
I'm not suggesting ALPA endorses condidates, but I'm asking whether a person that was training under an ab-initio relationship would be a new-hire, just as for ANA. If such person is covered, and I supect labor law and our contract would make sure they're covered, then we have leverage. Take myself for example - I was hired and paid by Delta as an academy instructor and as a Comair pilot. I've worn the widget for 12 years, but I'm still not on the Delta seniority list. I have no doubt that Delta could have paid for my training and gotten me to commit to whatever, only through a shell company that would keep me off the seniority list. And then there's the underboob... http://cdn.ebaumsworld.com/mediaFile...4/81843186.jpg |
Originally Posted by Sink r8
(Post 1291558)
You don't draw a distinction between people flying for a different airline, and people in training at your own airline?
All this shortage nonsense is just A4A carrying the water of the RAA to keep the ultra cheap feed coming. 1500 hours for regional FO's is a very low number historically and even less dramatic in the face of a shrinking regional structure over all. And there are so many flight schools out there that can and will ramp up when necessary it won't be a problem in the slightest. In fact it will actually help the long term pilot supply by incentivising instructors to stick with it for a year or so. 300 hours and out means no instructors and that just won't work beyond a couple quarters of big time hiring (I know, I know, by then someone will have gotten an A on their B school midterm and/or gotten a middle management level bonus for reducing costs or something and won't care anymore). When things get busy, any CFI can get 1000 hours a year or more, easy. As for cost, use regular airplanes. Not every hour has to be in a G1000 and besides its harder to transition to vastly inferior technology at the airlines anyway. :cool: |
Originally Posted by Boomer
(Post 1291544)
Johnso,
Your post count is 9,777. Is that also your bidding preference? :D |
Originally Posted by Sink r8
(Post 1291558)
You don't draw a distinction between people flying for a different airline, and people in training at your own airline?
We should require our outsourced flying be performed by ALPA members and the Compass guys should have been given seniority numbers, IMHO. Before we jump in to represent non-pilots, we should be representing our regional partners. |
Originally Posted by Bucking Bar
(Post 1291575)
...and the Compass guys should have been given seniority numbers, IMHO.
|
Originally Posted by Bucking Bar
(Post 1291575)
We should require our outsourced flying be performed by ALPA members
Now I know theoretically ALPA national will refuse signature until a high cost contract is signed, etc. but we have to come to grips with the realization that it will simply never happen because the only reason for the flying be off list to begin with is because its cheaper and kept cheaper from the endless RFP back stabbing low ball bidding process. ALPA can't prevent that from happening by allowing it to happen. The only solution is to bring the pilot positions directly to the mainline pilot seniority list and CBA. Anything else is putting bacon on the lipstick. |
Originally Posted by gloopy
(Post 1291573)
All this shortage nonsense is just A4A carrying the water of the RAA to keep the ultra cheap feed coming. 1500 hours for regional FO's is a very low number historically and even less dramatic in the face of a shrinking regional structure over all. ....
When things get busy, any CFI can get 1000 hours a year or more, easy. As for cost, use regular airplanes. Not every hour has to be in a G1000 and besides its harder to transition to vastly inferior technology at the airlines anyway. :cool: I wonder if A4A will change its tune when airlines like Delta pick up the phone. I know I'm cheaper than a 30 year Captain and a new hire is cheaper than me. The legacy airlines could use retirements to reduce costs. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 02:14 AM. |
|
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands