![]() |
|
Anyone care to ballpark the Feb 2013 profit sharing check as a % of our 2012 pay?
A little short on time, so I didn't want to have to peruse the Delta financial statements if someone had a round-a-bout %. Thanks. |
Originally Posted by MoonShot
(Post 1298680)
Anyone care to ballpark the Feb 2013 profit sharing check as a % of our 2012 pay?
A little short on time, so I didn't want to have to peruse the Delta financial statements if someone had a round-a-bout %. Thanks. |
A little help, SoCal guys. Where do we park at SNA?
|
Originally Posted by MoonShot
(Post 1298680)
Anyone care to ballpark the Feb 2013 profit sharing check as a % of our 2012 pay?
A little short on time, so I didn't want to have to peruse the Delta financial statements if someone had a round-a-bout %. Thanks. |
Originally Posted by MoonShot
(Post 1298680)
Anyone care to ballpark the Feb 2013 profit sharing check as a % of our 2012 pay?
A little short on time, so I didn't want to have to peruse the Delta financial statements if someone had a round-a-bout %. Thanks. |
Originally Posted by Denny Crane
(Post 1298666)
Okay, after eating some popcorn and reading some of the UAL and AMR threads, here is the question. What are everyones predictions as far as votes for and against go? I say at UAL 60% for 40% against. At AMR 45% for 55% against.
Anyone else?????:) Denny Any word on Alaska's attempt at a section 1? I hear some over there are concerned DL's 717 may take some of their flying. |
Originally Posted by Denny Crane
(Post 1298666)
Okay, after eating some popcorn and reading some of the UAL and AMR threads, here is the question. What are everyones predictions as far as votes for and against go? I say at UAL 60% for 40% against. At AMR 45% for 55% against.
Agree on UCAL. I think you might flip those % for AMR. They're getting to the end of the exclusivity period, and the end of their max leverage with Horton. My gut tells me neither the pilots nor management want to talk merger with LCC from a position of weakness. In fact, I really wonder if it will be LCC at all. JetBlue puts them in a great position in New York, which is critical. PHL does nothing for Horton, and neither does CLT. For the pilots, now that it could come to an integration, I doubt they want LCC. I think this slowly brings the vocal, but desperate mating dance with Parker to an abrupt end, as Horton and APA engage in some violent but unsatisfying make-up sex, and focus their energies on screwing someone else. Kicking Parker out of the car with his pants around his ankles becomes the icing on the cake; they put the pictures on fb, and move on. AMR has a strong history, and a strong sense of identity. I think they want to assimilate or conquer, not marry. I'm going purely on instinct here, and have no specific intel, but I expect a surprise, with the vote yielding the first clue. |
Originally Posted by TOGA LK
(Post 1298705)
I think those numbers are spot on, although the AA TA may pass because of the "pull up the ladder" mentality, group think within the mother base, etc. It is amazing how quickly we all ended up with the same scope clauses, almost miraculous.
Any word on Alaska's attempt at a section 1? I hear some over there are concerned DL's 717 may take some of their flying. |
Originally Posted by Sink r8
(Post 1298709)
Hi Denny,
Agree on UCAL. I think you might flip those % for AMR. They're getting to the end of the exclusivity period, and the end of their max leverage with Horton. My gut tells me neither the pilots nor management want to talk merger with LCC from a position of weakness. In fact, I really wonder if it will be LCC at all. JetBlue puts them in a great position in New York, which is critical. PHL does nothing for Horton, and neither does CLT. For the pilots, Now that it could come to an integration, I doubt they want LCC. I think this slowly brings the vocal, but desperate mating dance with Parker to an abrupt end, as Horton and APA engage in some violent but unsatisfying make-up sex, and focus their energies on screwing someone else. Kicking Parker out of the car with his pants around his ankles becomes the icing on the cake; they put the pictures on fb, and move on. AMR has a strong history, and a strong sense of identity. I think they want to assimilate or conquer, not marry. I'm going purely on instinct here, and have no specific intel, but I expect a surprise, with the vote yielding the first clue. |
Originally Posted by Timbo
(Post 1298704)
A number I heard tossed around was 6%...not sure how accurate that is, but you'd better tell your wife it's 3%. :D
Mentally, that is. Unless you misbehave. So I just tell her she's getting... six. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 05:27 PM. |
|
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands