Go Back  Airline Pilot Central Forums > Airline Pilot Forums > Major > Delta
Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? >

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Search

Notices

Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta?

Thread Tools
 
Search this Thread
 
Old 12-22-2012 | 10:45 AM
  #118561  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2010
Posts: 1,792
Likes: 0
From: Doing what you do, for less.
Default

I don't see what the big problem is. Delta Connection pilots are just baby Delta pilots. Why don't you all put on your big boy shoes and mentor them into the best Wind Checkers this industry has.

Old 12-22-2012 | 10:50 AM
  #118562  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 269
Likes: 0
From: 7ERA
Default

Originally Posted by johnso29
I emailed mine this morning, and received a quick response. My Rep is unaware of any participation by DALPA. It seems they weren't included.

As others have noted, the fact that DALPA was circumvented is a direct violation of our contract, as well as the ALPA National Policy Manual. It is not acceptable, and sets a very bad precedent.

EVERYONE needs to write their Rep on this issue.

Time will tell on this, but ALPA National is the exclusive bargaining agent and autonomy is give to the local level via the ALPA CBL.

Ford-Cooksey requires any part that may be effected to be made aware at the National level of ALPA that the talks are taking place. Local Autonomy provides that the MEC of a given airline does the direct bargaining and that National Approves the local level to initiate it. Nationals check of the process is have the president sign the agreement.

If DALPA was made aware, and the reps were not = issue on the MEC level

If all of DALPA was made aware on the MEC level = no issue but we should sign it too

If DALPA were totally unaware = big issue.
The cure for this is to restart negotiations with DALPA at the table and come to a new agreement that allows local autonomy to remain intact and the C&BL to be followed. The fix is not that big of a deal, but the repercussions may be for those at National that did not follow the admin manual or the C&BL.

Wait and see what transpires, there may be nothing to this. Facts need to come out. The issues that many have on here are; some of the details of the bridge agreement but mostly a process issue. Lets see if the process was followed. If it was not our MEC is bound to rectify it.
Old 12-22-2012 | 10:55 AM
  #118563  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jun 2008
Posts: 3,716
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by forgot to bid
Where is the rest of the language?
Old 12-22-2012 | 10:55 AM
  #118564  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: May 2010
Posts: 269
Likes: 0
From: 7ERA
Default

Originally Posted by lolwut
I don't see what the big problem is. Delta Connection pilots are just baby Delta pilots. Why don't you all put on your big boy shoes and mentor them into the best Wind Checkers this industry has.


The issues described have nothing to do with "those RJ pilots" its about process and protecting local autonomy. If Republic or another non-alpa carrier would have done this agreement without the concurrence of ALPA National the exclusivity language would be what would be used to stop it. Since it is a ALPA to ALPA represented pilot issue it comes down to local autonomy.

Many Delta pilots want to find ways to help DCI ALPA pilots, but they want the ALPA Constitution and By-laws as well as the Admin manual followed. Think if this was Virgin Atlantic (BALPA) and DAL. How do you think we would react? Probably much in the same way but the lines would be clearer drawn. Its about what this precedence sets not necessarily the terms of the deal. That is for the Delta MEC and their negotiators to decide.
Old 12-22-2012 | 11:05 AM
  #118565  
Roadkill's Avatar
meh
 
Joined: Oct 2010
Posts: 828
Likes: 0
Default

Originally Posted by LNL76
Hmmm, don't know---but I always got a big bear hug and a kiss whenever I saw him.
Hi, no offense intended here but... are you a pilot? I'm always confused by your posts, and have gotten the impression you may not be a pilot... which is OK but since this forum is at "Airline Pilot Central", then I'd say most folks assume everyone on here is a pilot.
If you're NOT a pilot, I think it would be more helpful for folks reading your posts and interacting with you to understand them, AND more honest, for you to put something in your user-info on the left that would let folks know that. Position "Fool Proof" would be the spot to put Flt Attendant, or something like that.
You may not realize it, but allowing folks to assume you are, since you're on an Airline Pilot Forum, changes the context of everything you write, and slants it in many reader's minds as an attempt to deceive. I don't get that impression from reading your posts, but am still left with a final impression of someone trying to deceive me. For example, the judgement of a captain's skills based on how smooth a landing was from the back is completely different than such a statement from someone flying with him as a co-pilot--one of them has a valid opinion on "Piloting skills" and another only on "captaining skills".

Anyways, I enjoy your input here but so much of what you post sounds slightly off and, well, "not informed" that I've begun to wonder if you're a flt attendant, and your response would be appreciated to help me understand and enjoy your posts more.
Thanks! Merry Xmas etc.
Old 12-22-2012 | 11:17 AM
  #118566  
georgetg's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Jul 2006
Posts: 1,724
Likes: 0
From: Boeing Hearing and Ergonomics Lab Rat, Night Shift
Default

Originally Posted by Rogue24
Think if this was Virgin Atlantic (BALPA) and DAL. How do you think we would react? Probably much in the same way but the lines would be clearer drawn. Its about what this precedence sets not necessarily the terms of the deal. That is for the Delta MEC and their negotiators to decide.
Rogue you get it, the precedence and how this might be used with bigger fish is the issue here!

Cheers
George
Old 12-22-2012 | 11:21 AM
  #118567  
Moderator
 
Joined: Oct 2006
Posts: 13,088
Likes: 0
From: B757/767
Default

Originally Posted by georgetg
Rogue you get it, the precedence and how this might be used with bigger fish is the issue here!

Cheers
George
Exactly. If we don't push back on this, then what stops Moak-a-man & management from circumventing DALPA while negotiating the VA JV?
Old 12-22-2012 | 11:29 AM
  #118568  
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Nov 2009
Posts: 1,226
Likes: 0
From: AN124 FE
Default

Originally Posted by NuGuy
Some of your reps are aware of the problem, but keep the cards and letters going...

Nu
I know I cant do anything but my "insider" had a lengthy talk with a rep about this, very ****ed off about the DALPA run around. The Rep had no clue about it either. Pretty shady that TW is...
Old 12-22-2012 | 11:47 AM
  #118569  
acl65pilot's Avatar
Happy to be here
 
Joined: Jun 2006
Posts: 18,563
Likes: 0
From: A-320A
Default

Guys and gals, e-mail your concerns and why they are concerns to your Reps and or elects.
Old 12-22-2012 | 01:07 PM
  #118570  
shiznit's Avatar
Gets Weekends Off
 
Joined: Feb 2009
Posts: 2,642
Likes: 0
From: right for a long, long time
Default

Originally Posted by georgetg
Agree...
I have no problem with the terms of the proposed bridge agreement.

What's troubling is that the Pinnacle Bridge agreement was negotiated without input or feedback from Delta ALPA.

Essentially this is about the scope of our Union.

Is Delta ALPA the exclusive bargaining agent representing pilots towards Delta management,
or can any other pilot group walk up and cut their own deal with Delta management?

Cheers
George
I'm merely referring to the principles of hiring other ALPA pilots in a preferential manner.

Oh I am completely in agreement as to the exclusivity we as Delta Pilots should have as it relates to negotiating with Delta management. Not sure how it works in lawyer world but it doesn't smell right to many of us line guys.
Related Topics
Thread
Thread Starter
Forum
Replies
Last Post
On Autopilot
Regional
22617
11-05-2021 07:03 AM
AeroCrewSolut
Delta
153
08-14-2018 12:18 PM
Bill Lumberg
Major
71
06-13-2012 08:36 AM
Quagmire
Major
253
04-16-2011 06:19 AM
JiffyLube
Major
12
03-07-2008 04:27 PM

Posting Rules
You may not post new threads
You may not post replies
You may not post attachments
You may not edit your posts

BB code is On
Smilies are On
[IMG] code is On
HTML code is Off
Trackbacks are On
Pingbacks are On
Refbacks are On



Your Privacy Choices