![]() |
Vacancies
ATL73NCAPT 10 00146 05500 INCREASED FLYING ATL73NF/O 13 03292 11477 INCREASED FLYING ATLM88F/O 5 05508 12339 INCREASED FLYING CVG73NCAPT 5 00706 05535 INCREASED FLYING CVG73NF/O 10 05877 11921 INCREASED FLYING CVGM88F/O 5 06292 12362 INCREASED FLYING LAX7ERCAPT 94 00170 05564 SHIFT IN FLYING LAX7ERF/O 90 01972 11608 SHIFT IN FLYING NYC73NCAPT 5 01301 07397 INCREASED FLYING NYCM88CAPT 10 02008 10019 INCREASED FLYING NYC73NF/O 12 06125 12243 INCREASED FLYING NYCM88F/O 15 08890 12371 INCREASED FLYING In accordance with the provisions of the pilot agreement, the following surpluses are posted: Nbr Of Surpluses ATL767CAPT 15 LAX767CAPT 109 SLC767F/O 3 ATL767F/O 45 LAX767F/O 102 I'll get whacked, again. It looks like a few LAX folks will be moving. Atlanta will be getting more senior, even on the 88. CVG will probably go more junior, as will NYC (if that's even possible). But, nothing about this says "furlough" to me. |
Originally Posted by bigdaddie
(Post 658014)
Bids are out. Mostly unremarkable. You have to get it from DBMS (e/icrew).
Also, spoke with a ATL 76 F/O on a layover last week and he said that ATL 7ER guys were getting assigned domestic trips and had domestic trips in their open time that they (ATL domestic) could not p/u. Told him to get the union involved. Of course domestic pilots will appear overmanned if you give their trips away to other categories. |
What an amazing coincidence: the number of surplus equals the number of vacancies...
|
Originally Posted by slowplay
(Post 657983)
You think Tim will enjoy his return to line flying?
|
For us lowly FO, here's the prognosis in net inc/dec for each base:
-27 in ATL, +27 in NYC, +15 in CVG, -3 in SLC, last but not least, -12 in LAX. As expected, the long awaited west coast expansion hasn't occured yet:) |
They're just waiting to see what it will cost them when California goes BK.
|
Originally Posted by Burn Notice
(Post 658073)
They're just waiting to see what it will cost them when California goes BK.
|
Originally Posted by Burn Notice
(Post 658073)
They're just waiting to see what it will cost them when California goes BK.
Kinda funny since that's the 2 cities that I commuted out of from my previous employers. |
I don't not have long left in California, due to a pending move back east. This is my third time living in CA. People always talk trash about the state, but people are still moving here. It's the 7th largest economy in the world. It's not going away.
It's like a Dallas guy that I flew with recently that was telling me how Californians refuse to drill for oil. Asked him if he had driven through the central valley lately. Bakersfield area is just wall to wall oil wells. Strategic Petroleum Reserve there as well. When oil was approaching $150/barrel I saw new oil wells being drilled along the coast just South of Ventura within 1/4 of the beach. I imagine within a 8 mile stretch, I saw 20 new well being drilled. The Santa Barbara Channel, just in front of my house has several of the largest oil platforms that I have ever seen in my life. I guess the national news channels did happen to see this. The point is, California is not going anywhere. I hope that Delta eventually will have a good foothold here as they did when they bought Western. 80% of international flights flown out of LA are by foreign carriers. (Statistics 2-3 years old). |
Originally Posted by acl65pilot
(Post 657178)
Man, we have some 20 somethings that post here quite a bit, you really think that terminal can last that long?
I do not mind JFK either. Great for the pocket book! Well, the construction isn't quite as good, but some buildings DO last a pretty long time. http://i229.photobucket.com/albums/e...dofKhafre2.jpg |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:40 PM. |
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands