Airline Pilot Central Forums

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   Delta (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/delta/)
-   -   Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/delta/36912-any-latest-greatest-about-delta.html)

johnso29 01-22-2013 07:23 AM


Originally Posted by scambo1 (Post 1335783)
I think that can has been kicked 2-3 years down the road BY the competition. Trainer, if it's everything I hope, may just make us uncatchable.

+717

Agreed, & I think the competition is beginning to realize they're falling behind. The trainer just may put them all in the dust.

scambo1 01-22-2013 07:23 AM


Originally Posted by nwaf16dude (Post 1335785)
Basically right...their flow provisions will severely cut down on the number of "lifers" at the higher end of their longevity scales. As Bar often says, flow agreements reset longevity (or something like that). So as we start hiring, we'll take their guys at a pretty high rate before they get to the higher paid years...and of course their longevity doesn't transfer.

It's a crappy deal for the Pinnacle guys, but hopefully we will take their guys pretty quickly so that job becomes a truly temporary gig like it should be.

That's my take too.

Sink r8 01-22-2013 07:25 AM


Originally Posted by scambo1 (Post 1335783)
I think that can has been kicked 2-3 years down the road BY the competition. Trainer, if it's everything I hope, may just make us uncatchable.

True, but any of us can really crank up capacity, merely by dropping the aircraft retirement rate, considering the flood of new deliveries. I tend to see AMR as eager to gain a decisive advantage in terms of network, and UCAL won't want to become #2.

A lot is being made about network breadth driving revenue premiums, and Trainer can't get you there.

scambo1 01-22-2013 07:25 AM


Originally Posted by johnso29 (Post 1335786)
Agreed, & I think the competition is beginning to realize they're falling behind. The trainer just may put them all in the dust.

The real trainer benefit comes when crude is piped there directly from the oil field.

johnso29 01-22-2013 07:27 AM


Originally Posted by nwaf16dude (Post 1335785)
Basically right...their flow provisions will severely cut down on the number of "lifers" at the higher end of their longevity scales. As Bar often says, flow agreements reset longevity (or something like that). So as we start hiring, we'll take their guys at a pretty high rate before they get to the higher paid years...and of course their longevity doesn't transfer.

It's a crappy deal for the Pinnacle guys, but hopefully we will take their guys pretty quickly so that job becomes a truly temporary gig like it should be.

The other thing is does is keep the overall cost of DCI feed low. Several of the DCI carriers owned by Skywest Inc are required to be the 2nd lowest costing DCI carrier. Skywest Inc has a rate reset coming up in 2015. Both their ExpressJet unit and Skywest unit must meet the 2nd lowest DCI carrier requirement per the CPA.

Delta management has accelerated a DCI "race to the bottom".

scambo1 01-22-2013 07:28 AM


Originally Posted by Sink r8 (Post 1335789)
True, but any of us can really crank up capacity, merely by dropping the aircraft retirement rate, considering the flood of new deliveries. I tend to see AMR as eager to gain a decisive advantage in terms of network, and UCAL won't want to become #2.

A lot is being made about network breadth driving revenue premiums, and Trainer can't get you there.

I don't want to argue for the company at our expense, so I'll just whistle past the graveyard on this one.

firstmob 01-22-2013 07:32 AM


Originally Posted by scambo1 (Post 1335774)
That hasn't stopped us in the past. Although the real deal is the kingfisher jets and HI. Remember, consolidation isn't over. The pieces have to fall into place in just the right order though.

How many jets does Kingfisher Air have?

Sink r8 01-22-2013 07:33 AM


Originally Posted by scambo1 (Post 1335795)
I don't want to argue for the company at our expense, so I'll just whistle past the graveyard on this one.

Makes sense to me. We just don't know whether they're going to be able to keep the lid on capacity (hope not). I think they're hedging their bets more in these last two quarterly costs, and not letting themsleves be too tied to promises of capacity discipline.

Bottom line: I think we all understand we're not working for the airline that's going to grow more than the industry average, no matter which way total industry capacity goes.

scambo1 01-22-2013 07:35 AM


Originally Posted by firstmob (Post 1335797)
How many jets does Kingfisher Air have?

they have 66 jets.

Sink r8 01-22-2013 07:36 AM

Stock's just shy of a new 52-week high.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 04:35 PM.


Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands