![]() |
|
Originally Posted by ilinipilot
(Post 1342656)
Hi
Their response was of interest and helping me find the answers and I was impressed. I think BC was happy with my question and really helped me find an answer by using his phone to contact HK. My worry about the formula was the fact that it looks good and helps with staffing but its just step one of a two step solution. If the staffing formula calls for the fact they need more people then what do you do? That was my honest question to the both of them because it seems good on the surface but without a trigger or enforcement mechanism its hard to see how it helps us outside of pointing out a problem. Another point I raised to HK was: OK so the staffing formula calls for more people (he agrees and the company puts out a bid). That does not solve the problem because that is not an immediate solution. If we get into an understaffed situation ie the M88. Lets say in May 2013 the one year look back says yes our TLV was too high we need more people. OK the company puts out a bid in May2013 that does not correct the problem. So now the M88 drivers are stuck again with a crappy summer of lots of flying and the relief comes in SEPT with more people and more lines. My beef with the staffing formula all along has been its a good idea on paper but it falls short of accomplishing what it was designed to do. I will admit I do not know what can be done outside of tying enforcment mechanisms to it. IE if the TLV is exceeded all bases with higher TLV are paid 5 hours above ALV something like that. This is a direction I would like to see our MEC/LEC pursue in the future penalties within the contract for lack of compliance so their becomes a cost to any noncompliance. Thanks |
Originally Posted by GunshipGuy
(Post 1342682)
Did he stab that deer before he snorted the antler powder?
|
Originally Posted by cni187
(Post 1342751)
That's funny! Not that I care anyway. Old man Lewis is not going to stop Kaep and the pistol read-option.
|
Turn on what ever chanel your local cable has CNBC on, right now, there is a great show about why the 787 is so AFU. (8pm east coast)
|
Originally Posted by Timbo
(Post 1342796)
Turn on what ever chanel your local cable has CNBC on, right now, there is a great show about why the 787 is so AFU. (8pm east coast)
|
Originally Posted by GunshipGuy
(Post 1342682)
Did he stab that deer before he snorted the antler powder?
|
Originally Posted by forgot to bid
(Post 1342802)
8pm east coast time, 5pm specific time?
The good news is, Boeing is working on replacing...PILOTS! At least the Boeing guy was honest when asked, "Is the 787 a black eye for Boeing?" "Yes, it's a setback" (re. 3 years overdue) And this was filmed -before- the battery issues started! :rolleyes: And the KC767 'procurement' issue is being discussed. Wow. Just fking wow. Such a great company, so sleezy. |
Originally Posted by forgot to bid
(Post 1342806)
Does deer antler powder make you a better football player or just increase your chances that you have a two year relationship with some dude that you think is a hot girl from Hawaii?
Did you see what Wes Welker's wife said about Ray Lewis? Oh yeah, 4 wives, 6 kids, aquited of Murder, paid off the family. Yeah, he's a real role model... :rolleyes: Of the 7 Patriots selected for the Pro Bowl, two showed up, one of them was -not- Wes Welker.:D |
Originally Posted by cni187
(Post 1342751)
That's funny! Not that I care anyway. Old man Lewis is not going to stop Kaep and the pistol read-option.
|
Originally Posted by buzzpat
(Post 1342820)
Its not gonna come down to Lewis. Ed Reed is gonna be the x factor. The Packer safeties never stepped up. If the Raven safeties do, its a game.
|
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 07:44 PM. |
|
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands