Airline Pilot Central Forums

Airline Pilot Central Forums (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/)
-   Delta (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/delta/)
-   -   Any "Latest & Greatest" about Delta? (https://www.airlinepilotforums.com/delta/36912-any-latest-greatest-about-delta.html)

forgot to bid 01-31-2013 06:26 PM

Airplane News:
All Nippon likely to seek 787 compensation from Boeing
FAA 787 Inspections Reveal Checks Were Left to Boeing - Bloomberg
787 Investigation Progresses But Solution Is Elusive
Air Iceland Raises The Bar For Dash 8 Avionics
http://www.aviationweek.com/media/im...ldAviation.jpg

So wait, a Dash 8-200 operator can upgrade their cockpits but an MD-88 is a broken record of "free beer tomorrow!" or "it's been approved, just waiting the go ahead..."

Helpful Man Card News:
Doing household chores may mean less sex for married men - CBS News

Sports News:
NFLPA lay out complaints about player safety issues - ESPN
Falcons Starting To See Why No One Believed In Them | The Onion - America's Finest News Source

Low Information Voter News:
Beyonce says I sang along with national anthem at inauguration that I was late for...
Teenage Girl Blossoming Into Beautiful Object | The Onion - America's Finest News Source

Dang, most of the low information voter news is sports related from XGames death to Dan Marino to 49ers no gay players here rant. Sorry, trying to keep it all separated.

SailorJerry 01-31-2013 06:31 PM


Originally Posted by biigD (Post 1343480)
Quick question for you -88 drivers:

Assuming good VFR conditions and no anticipated delays, what kind of landing fuel do you guys typically plan for?

Does anyone else notice the -88 over burning and over flying estimated flying times? Where I come from that's mighty taboo.

KC10 FATboy 01-31-2013 06:36 PM

Not sure if it was posted yet ... Fly the Danica Skies.


forgot to bid 01-31-2013 06:36 PM


Originally Posted by SailorJerry (Post 1343715)
Does anyone else notice the -88 over burning and over flying estimated flying times? Where I come from that's mighty taboo.

I don't on either the fuel or ETEs. What are you seeing?

SailorJerry 01-31-2013 06:40 PM


Originally Posted by forgot to bid (Post 1343720)

I don't. What are you seeing?

Mostly into ATL. Overburns of 6-700lbs with a planned 1:15 flight taking 1:22-1:24. Same with other airports.

My guess is that there's no arrival buffer built into the flight planning software. It just plans time and gas from the end of the arrival direct the airport.

biigD 01-31-2013 07:02 PM

Interesting. Thanks all for the responses. My company is starting to get more aggressive about minimizing the extra fuel we carry around, and I was trying to get a feel for how the big boys play it.

forgot to bid 01-31-2013 07:04 PM


Originally Posted by SailorJerry (Post 1343726)
Mostly into ATL. Overburns of 6-700lbs with a planned 1:15 flight taking 1:22-1:24. Same with other airports.

My guess is that there's no arrival buffer built into the flight planning software. It just plans time and gas from the end of the arrival direct the airport.

Well, you're very precise. I guess I'm a measure once and cut twice type. :D But a few minutes here or there I just chalk that up to traffic (short final to 28 or way out there by Alabama landing on 8L). I've looked down and seen the ETE entered into the ACARS be pretty spot on but it'd be a good question to know if they're using favoring winds to determine approaches and therefore landing times. I'd say taxi times can be way off, but vast majority of the time that's in our favor.

I don't do a full HOWZITHANGIN unless I'm bored or it's a CUN type flight. When I do it I've never really seen a 600 lb difference that cannot be explained. I just run the CI that's on the flight plan though unless there is a good reason to go higher. Of course sometimes you go 3 hours staring at a yoke in a bank and those fading white indicators out of trim, but I don't tell anyone how to fly. Probably doesn't help fuel burn.

Next time I fly I'll watch it but I can't say I've seen anything that jumped out at me.

forgot to bid 01-31-2013 07:14 PM


Originally Posted by biigD (Post 1343734)
Interesting. Thanks all for the responses. My company is starting to get more aggressive about minimizing the extra fuel we carry around, and I was trying to get a feel for how the big boys play it.

Random story, but it kind of reminds me of when I was at Coex and we had a pilot only rule of thumb of 3000lbs as the sort of kinda min fuel on the E145. The company wanted to a) take us out of the loop on ordering fuel and b) start using the real min fuel of 1800 lbs or somewhere around there. For good reason.

Well right before they decided to go lower I'm doing a CLE-MSP flight the FMS pops up and says we'll land with 2900 lbs. Captain panics and wants to divert to MKE which was not on the flight plan anywhere. I said, okay, let me tell dispatch you want to divert. NO TIME! Well, it's 30 minutes behind us... NO TIME! MUST GO! TELL ATC WE NEED PRIORITY HANDLING! (all I could think was don't laugh, I think he's serious)

We made it to MSP. We landed with 2900 lbs and he filled out an ASAP. I bet that dude had an aneurism when it dropped to 1800ish lbs. Actually, I think he was bound to have an aneurism anyways.

The way I think we came to accept this was that we weren't the ones ordering fuel anymore. You couldn't blame us if the fuel we were given turned out not to be enough and we diverted. Which of course costs lots of money and if it happened often then they'd adjust up. I don't think they had to, it ended up working and we just reset our personal minimums.

but it was kind of like "this is your problem, not my problem." I'll land with plenty of fuel, but whether that place was the intended destination was up to them and their computer.

Carl Spackler 01-31-2013 07:23 PM


Originally Posted by forgot to bid (Post 1343146)
Has anyone ever seen this oil painting of LM? Where is it?

I wonder what it looks like? I'm thinking something like this:

http://i938.photobucket.com/albums/a...psaf10d46d.png



You're probably right. Some people can't even pose properly for their oil painting.



https://lh3.googleusercontent.com/-I...w/s512/Oil.jpg



Carl

Timbo 01-31-2013 07:31 PM


Originally Posted by hockeypilot44 (Post 1343679)
Unfortunately, most of the hotels internet is too slow to stream. I have a family member with a slingbox. I use this to watch my team at home. It does not help me on the road though. A lot of the games are on NHL network or NBC Sports Network.


Here's my problem, I live in FL, but I love the Bruins! So I can't watch the B's on local FL TV, unless they are playing the Lightning or Panthers. :rolleyes:

BUT...at least the Lightning are playing well this year, fun to watch Marty St. Louis, and Vinny and Stamkos, but tonight, the B's LOST, 7-4 to the much hated Sabres! :eek:

So...I'll just have to wait until it's the B's agains the L's again in the playoffs. That was fun, Marty vs. his old VT room mate, Thomas.


All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:06 AM.


Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands