![]() |
|
Originally Posted by scambo1
(Post 1351205)
My issue with what was put out by our union is that; "by the end of the contract you will make what they make," (paraphrased) is (only half) true...So they (the DALPA sales team) stopped right there...They compared hourly rate to hourly rate.
As most here know, at SWA, (established) pay rates are only a part of the story. I am no expert on all the SWA pay rules. (Apparently, from a previous post, I am no expert on DAL pay rules either.:D) If you compare W-2s, head to head, SWA pilots can make an a$$load more than we can. I don't personally believe it makes a person an outlier or two standard deviations to the left or right to expect our collective bargaining agent to tell us the whole truth. It is not my desire to find fault, but I find it personally insulting to be lied to. My own assessment is that the lies (or half truths) flow in order to further an agenda which, to me, seems counter to the true betterment of the DAL pilots. This is, in my viewpoint, true of the (perceived) lack of adherance to the contract surveys, the 717 won't come unless..., SWA pay, statements like "they aren't in our competitive set", statements like "outsourcing is good for DAL pilots", etc. It seems as if DAL management has plenty of investable capital - or ties to get it. Trainer, VA, 76 seaters, etc. They just don't seem willing to invest it in Delta Air Lines directly unless they get a super duper deal...Okay, I get that. The next big litmus test will be JV compliance. My prediction is... At any rate, most of the guys pushing don't seem to be lying, because they actually believe. |
Originally Posted by slowplay
(Post 1351212)
You mean the C2012 contract comparison that was completely plagiarized by SWAPA in their own contract preps?:rolleyes:
Originally Posted by slowplay
(Post 1351212)
Or that SWAPA memo that said DAL was going to pass them in contract value?:p
Originally Posted by slowplay
(Post 1351212)
Intentionally misleading and covering up the truths...please.
Carl |
Originally Posted by Sink r8
(Post 1351257)
At any rate, most of the guys pushing don't seem to be lying, because they actually believe.
But what is your view on why our own union would go to such galactic lengths to show heavily skewed data for the sole purpose of making management's case that we should only expect minimal gains? What union would do that? I totally get why management would do it, but why our own union? We had absolutely no advocate on our side of the table. We had note takers that simply communicated to us what management was willing to do...and not do. Carl |
Originally Posted by Carl Spackler
(Post 1351263)
That's a very interesting take.
But what is your view on why our own union would go to such galactic lengths to show heavily skewed data for the sole purpose of making management's case that we should only expect minimal gains? What union would do that? I totally get why management would do it, but why our own union? We had absolutely no advocate on our side of the table. We had note takers that simply communicated to us what management was willing to do...and not do. Carl |
Originally Posted by Carl Spackler
(Post 1351263)
That's a very interesting take.
But what is your view on why our own union would go to such galactic lengths to show heavily skewed data for the sole purpose of making management's case that we should only expect minimal gains? What union would do that? I totally get why management would do it, but why our own union? We had absolutely no advocate on our side of the table. We had note takers that simply communicated to us what management was willing to do...and not do. As to why people go to absurd lengths defending TA's, or the union, I wonder about them the same way I wonder about the guys trying at all cost to slam the union, or a TA. There isn't a straw so small that they aren't willing to grasp at it, or too big that the other side is trying to sweep under the rug. The only rational explanation to this behavior, in my mind, is power struggles. A lot of guys, ALPA or DPA, pro or anti-TA, sometimes N or S, are just in it for their side to prevail against another side. The more I observe, the more I think people get backed into an ideology, a little bit like what's happening in our national political scene, but without any press coverage. I don't think it's about the best outcome, or the pilot group, or the profession, but about the guys trying to steer something their way, get their cronies in, and the other guys' cronies out, and get changes effected, like the retirement age. As for the rest of us that would just like good governance, and reform... we're just the inconsequential casualties in the quest for a lower ideal. |
So if nothing great and stupendous materializes before the end of 2015, you think DALPA will try and sell us another subpar contract? Hopefully this group(Dal Pilots) will be a lot more critical next time.
|
Originally Posted by Purple Drank
(Post 1350416)
Then why are you still here spewing DALPA talking points?
Yes, yes. We've got it. you are trying to separate yourself from all the failure you helped propagate. It becomes more and more apparent with each passing day that we got bamboozled on the contract. Why can't DALPA just admit we got our clocks cleaned? Rather than telling us how they plan to rectify it, they just continue the demagoguery and jedi mind tricks. The well is poisoned. We'll never achieve our earnings/lifestyle potential with DALPA (and its self-serving, self-preserving agenda) on the property. If you ever decide to get off your butt and actually do something, then you will find out that solutions are never as easy as they seem. It is ironic that the same people that go ballistic on this forum over the "FLY" button on the Delta safety video, then act as if there is a "GET MORE" button at the union office, and the only thing we need to do is push that button and money will flow like the Mississippi in April. If it were that easy then someone at American, or United, or Continental, or Southwest, or US Airways would have pressed that button a long time ago. Remember American took 6 years and they never found that button, Airtran 7 years, United 3 years, Continental 4 years. Why oh why did they not push that button? Is it just that Carl, and TOGA, and Purple knew where the button was and didn't tell them, or is it because that button does not exist. I think you can tell that the button does not exist. There is only one thing. Work. Grinding, difficult, stressful work. Of course you don't know that because you have never done it, instead you choose to denigrate those that work on your behalf. But hey, we have a free country so you can say what you want. I just ask all the readers to decide which theory is more plausible; is there some magic button to push or is there just a series of extremely difficult problems to solve and solving them is neither easy nor free of problems. You decide. The fact is that our deal was the trigger that broke the entire industry out of the bankruptcy era. United followed us. American is directly hanging onto our coattails. US Airways is just along for the ride with American. Without our deal, we are stuck for years and years in stasis. So launch away with your attacks it makes no difference to me. I know what I did, I know what our team accomplished, I know what it meant to the industry. Almost every negotiator, professional and pilot alike, has expressed their gratitude to the Delta MEC for breaking out of the logjam. I value their opinions over the webboard guys any day. So I am now much happier that I have peeled off those layers of responsibility layers that affected me both at work and at home for too many years. I feel no remorse because I gave my time, now it is someone else's turn. In the most difficult times I always relied on this quote from Winston Churchill: "It is not the critic who counts: not the man who points out how the strong man stumbles or where the doer of deeds could have done better. The credit belongs to the man who is actually in the arena, whose face is marred by dust and sweat and blood, who strives valiantly, who errs and comes up short again and again, because there is no effort without error or shortcoming, but who knows the great enthusiasms, the great devotions, who spends himself for a worthy cause; who, at the best, knows, in the end, the triumph of high achievement, and who, at the worst, if he fails, at least he fails while daring greatly, so that his place shall never be with those cold and timid souls who knew neither victory nor defeat." So I have stumbled, I have fallen short, I have dared and lost, I admit to all those failings. But I was there, fighting the best fight I could and others were sitting on the sidelines carping and crying and complaining. If that makes you feel superior then go ahead. I don't see it that way. I have a camaraderie with those guys that I fought with that will last my lifetime. Those are just as important to me as the monetary gains that we achieved. I only wish for you that you can get off this mountain of bitterness that you have built for yourself and get involved in some positive action to better the lives of those around you. You seem to be a particularly unhappy and bitter person. Your attacks mean nothing to me as you aren't in the arena, you aren't fighting the fight, you are just a brick thrower. I hope that didn't bamboozle you. |
Originally Posted by dalad
(Post 1351217)
Well, JFK-GEO is cancelled in May. FLL-MEX is starting though. GEO used to be one of our most profitable routes, but Carribean has poached it, along with a fuel subsidy from the Trinidadian government.
|
Originally Posted by cni187
(Post 1351302)
So if nothing great and stupendous materializes before the end of 2015, you think DALPA will try and sell us another subpar contract? Hopefully this group(Dal Pilots) will be a lot more critical next time.
group would have grown a pair. I was shocked to see scope loosened, work rules not addressed, pay adjusted by the smallest amount and hear pilots sound scared if we turned down the first offer. Our union pushed the TA like nothing I've ever seen before. I'll never understand why the survey results were never published to the pilots. I truly hope that some day our pilots get upset over the set backs we've lived thru. |
Originally Posted by Carl Spackler
(Post 1351263)
That's a very interesting take.
But what is your view on why our own union would go to such galactic lengths to show heavily skewed data for the sole purpose of making management's case that we should only expect minimal gains? What union would do that? I totally get why management would do it, but why our own union? We had absolutely no advocate on our side of the table. We had note takers that simply communicated to us what management was willing to do...and not do. Carl Carl's pay rate premerger 178 per hour. Carl's payrate on 1 Jan 14. 262 per hour plus 39 per hour DC. Total new rate 301 per hour. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 03:43 PM. |
|
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands