![]() |
|
Originally Posted by sailingfun
(Post 1351475)
Our 88/90 fleet is being way underutilized so your numbers don't have any meaning. The number used to measure productivity that is valid is block hours flown per pilot.
2011 numbers SWA 62.1 DAL 42.9 Those numbers are being skewed some because Delta was carrying a greater surplus of pilots then SWA however we are no where near their level of productivity. 2012 numbers are not out yet.
Originally Posted by sailingfun
(Post 1351478)
The apples to apples measurement is block hours flown per pilot. Unless you know the average daily usage of each fleet comparing hulls to pilots is meaningless. The comparison posted also uses the total number of SW pilots including management, training, mil leave, personal leave, long term sick verses the exact manning numbers at Delta on the 88/90 excluding the above pilots. To get a actual comparison you have to add all those pilots back into the Delta numbers.
|
Originally Posted by Flamer
(Post 1351483)
It was intentionally misleading. It used small nuggets of data broken out in individual sections to portray the TA favorably to other contracts. To say our vacation, for example, is even in the same ball park as SWA or FDX is just not true. Then, the overall wrap up for compensation was absent as well. I'll repost the AirTran welcome packet link. Every SWA pilot here has stated that this is truth data. So if you are so proud of the transparent presentation of the data in the 2012 contract comparison, why is there such a disparity? Try not to take this personally, I just wish people didn't have to do their own research because our union was providing FULL truth data. Scambo makes 30% less flying the 777 than his peer SWA buddy. That is a fact. It would be nice if ALPA would at least acknowledge that. They lose credibility, at least with me, when they don't. I am not as upset about making less than I am about being told that I actually am.
http://library.constantcontact.com/d...me-Booklet.pdf Compensation
|
Originally Posted by forgot to bid
(Post 1351498)
Question for you, 621 vs 429 (I assume?), is that DAL domestic vs Southwest only? Because if it does include international pilots then that's skewed and not an apples-to-apples comparison.
If you want to argue about block hours per pilot a much better case can be made based on the fleet at Delta. Managements decision to operate a fleet comprised of every orphaned and bastard child aircraft in the world builds into the system ineffiencies not found at SW. Still even adjusting for that SW is far more efficient. In 2011 their average daily aircraft utilization was 10.5 hours a day. Delta was at 9.2 on narrow bodies. That alone should require SW to need 13 to 14 percent more pilots per airframe if all other factors were equal. |
Originally Posted by Flamer
(Post 1351483)
It was intentionally misleading. It used small nuggets of data broken out in individual sections to portray the TA favorably to other contracts.
TA? The one that SWAPA plagiarized for their own negotiation purposes?
Originally Posted by Flamer
(Post 1351483)
Try not to take this personally, I just wish people didn't have to do their own research because our union was providing FULL truth data.
Oh, I note that you and FtB aren't quoting the post-TA SWAPA bulletin where it talks how Delta pilots will pass them...are you being selective or intentionally misleading?:rolleyes: |
Originally Posted by Jack Bauer
(Post 1351438)
Don't forget 757's/767's are soon to be replaced by 737's further lowering the median Delta pilot wage negating C2012 wage increases paid for by RJ 2.0 and increased productivity.
|
Originally Posted by GunshipGuy
(Post 1351414)
Well, right now we're seeing more productivity, but without a comparable W-2. So if I'm experiencing the negative, it would only seem logical that I'd like the positive which the other guy enjoys.
|
Sailing, according to the welcome to SWA packet, they say they:
Last year we found out we flew around 1.9M domestic block hours and when divided by a fleet of 566 domestic jets you come up with a number of about 3,428 hours per domestic DAL jet per year. Those numbers are close to industry standards so I'll run with them. So using their data from the AirTran welcome packet:
So a little less... unless you take into account they are talking about reducing the staffing. Say, a 3.3% reduction or 58.38 pilots system wide? Then we equal SWA. Except that I don't know too many MD88/MD90 As and Bs making $240,000 and $140,000 with an average of 18 days off a month.So are we getting close to SWA productivity? I don't know, looks like they fly their jets a little more and the individual pilot flies more hours in less days than we do but they get more days off. So, yes from a company standpoint but no from a pilot standpoint. Now lets assume for a moment all of this is right, what now? What does it mean? It means, we get what we negotiate and approve or allow. *5813 pilots plus 10% is around 6458, so it looks like 10% is the average for offline pilots as well. **Based on 65 MD90s |
I'm stunned and amazed at just how inefficient Delta really is, when you consider all the different aircraft types, +717, we will be operating! Just consider how many pilots are tied up in training, plus all the instructors, for all those different fleets, plus fleet captains, etc.
Now throw in the cost of buying and holding all those different spare parts, and training the mechanics and F/A's and gate agents, how to deal with all the different types. I'm amazed we make any money at all! IF and when Delta mgt. ever decides to thin the fleets (ie. park all the 767's/757's for 737's) there will be a huge surplus of pilots, no doubt. This will take a few years obviously, but long term (next 10+ years), I expect them to consolodate and eventually have half as many different aircraft types as we have today. BUT...the bottom line is, with regard to SWA, no company can be as efficient as they are, unless you also operate only one fleet type. Back in 2004, I had Jerry the Genius on my jumpseat going ATL to AMS about 6mo. before he declared bankruptcy. We asked him what the long term plan was, aircraft wise. He said eventually they would like to have only two fleets; the 787 for all international flying, and the 737 for all domestic flying. And if I were king at Boeing, I'd be making their cockpits identical, and pushing for a dual type rating for the two of them. That was then, this is now, and RA2 doesn't seem to live by that rule, quite the opposite, seems he's never walked away from a yard sale empty handed...but I wonder about the additional costs of adding fleet types. Sure the airframes are cheaper than new ones, but what about the added costs of training people, and more, different parts, etc.? That has to get figured in there too. |
Originally Posted by Timbo
(Post 1351518)
I'm stunned and amazed at just how inefficient Delta really is.
But, we gotta push at a 45 degree angle? Huh? |
Originally Posted by forgot to bid
(Post 1351513)
Sailing, according to the welcome to SWA packet, they say they:
Last year we found out we flew around 1.9M domestic block hours and when divided by a fleet of 566 domestic jets you come up with a number of about 3,428 hours per domestic DAL jet per year. Those numbers are close to industry standards so I'll run with them. So using their data from the AirTran welcome packet:
So a little less... unless you take into account they are talking about reducing the staffing. Say, a 3.3% reduction or 58.38 pilots system wide? Then we equal SWA. Except that I don't know too many MD88/MD90 As and Bs making $240,000 and $140,000 with an average of 18 days off a month.So are we getting close to SWA productivity? I don't know, looks like they fly their jets a little more and the individual pilot flies more hours in less days than we do but they get more days off. So, yes from a company standpoint but no from a pilot standpoint. Now lets assume for a moment all of this is right, what now? What does it mean? It means, we get what we negotiate and approve or allow. *5813 pilots plus 10% is around 6458, so it looks like 10% is the average for offline pilots as well. **Based on 65 MD90s In the end however the only valid way to compare pilot productivity is block hours per pilot. SW enjoys a huge advantage in that department. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 11:51 PM. |
|
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands