![]() |
|
Originally Posted by slowplay
(Post 1353788)
In the last 4 months the MEC elected a new MEC Chairman.
|
Originally Posted by johnso29
(Post 1354149)
And since I fly very little on reserve I'm home a lot. If I don't counteract cynicism with my own optimism, then that cynicism spreads to my home life(I know, it shouldn't. It really shouldn't) & makes my wife unhappy. So really, it's a defense mechanism to protect me from an angry wife!
|
Originally Posted by Carl Spackler
(Post 1354134)
Gentlemen, this has nothing to do with who is or who isn't optimistic about our airline. We all hope for the best. This is a debate on exactly what will make our families futures the brightest while not killing our golden goose. To be lumped in with the slowplay/sailingfun/alfaromeo group doesn't mean you're too optimistic about Delta. To many of us, it means you hold our bargaining agent in the most favorable possible light...no matter what. Even when that national agent does something as egregious as the Pinnacle deal. When I see you instantly go into the "defend ALPA mode", it makes me just do the face palm. Carl I always tried to make sure constituent pilots have all the facts. We lead busy, complicated lives as pilots, and there's enough information flowing out there that we could literally be overwhelmed by it. I'm thankful that some guys are crazy enough to try to wrestle with it all, but I'd appreciate a bigger picture view, and I'd appreciate more reps flying the line, rather than being part time office jockeys. Been there, tried that - you lose touch after about 10 days away from the line. Bottom line, ALPA lost the right to make up my mind for me after 10 days on the property. If I support them, even over something contentious, it's because unity is the prevailing winning condition. I assure you though, my own opinion and my own perspective is my own, typically derived from my own facts. If that's optimistic, then I guess that's a good thing. We're moving in the right direction, but I was certainly hoping for a larger shift in direction and tact from ALPA with a new poodle...err...MEC Chairman in place. |
Originally Posted by capncrunch
(Post 1353877)
I flew as an engeneer on the freighter out of ANC and have heard that story told a number of times. I believe it's true. I know for sure that NWA jumpseaters to/from ANC got priority over other offline jumpseaters.
The problem was, it was only supposed to be between LAX, SEA, ANC and MSP. The CSAs didn't get the word and were doing it system wide. |
Originally Posted by Jack Bauer
(Post 1354168)
I have a feeling your mood will change as the full productivity the company won (ie you are away from your family not by choice) is put into action over the coming months. Giving up work rules that decrease quality of life. DUMB DUMB DUMB! You will see. I have lived through this before and it's not fun. The question is not how far. The question is: Do you posses the constitution? The depth of faith... ...to go as far as is needed? |
Originally Posted by SailorJerry
(Post 1354169)
I'd heard so much good about constructive engagement when I stepped foot through the door here that I assumed that ALPA could do no wrong. By the end of my newhire pizza and beer fest I was angry enough to say something to the newhire guy. ALPA, as you pointed out earlier, was in fact the guiding force of the pilots - not the other way around, as it should be. It was clear, and remains clear over 2 years later that all committees are operating and dictating opinion TO the pilots while intentionally withholding facts. I never went into defend ALPA mode about the PNCL thing. (Mr Johnso on the other hand...) but I was at least put at ease after I reached out to my rep and got the facts. It's been years since anyone said "well the pilots think..." to management here. That's wrong.
I always tried to make sure constituent pilots have all the facts. We lead busy, complicated lives as pilots, and there's enough information flowing out there that we could literally be overwhelmed by it. I'm thankful that some guys are crazy enough to try to wrestle with it all, but I'd appreciate a bigger picture view, and I'd appreciate more reps flying the line, rather than being part time office jockeys. Been there, tried that - you lose touch after about 10 days away from the line. Bottom line, ALPA lost the right to make up my mind for me after 10 days on the property. If I support them, even over something contentious, it's because unity is the prevailing winning condition. I assure you though, my own opinion and my own perspective is my own, typically derived from my own facts. If that's optimistic, then I guess that's a good thing. We're moving in the right direction, but I was certainly hoping for a larger shift in direction and tact from ALPA with a new poodle...err...MEC Chairman in place. Carl |
Originally Posted by Jack Bauer
(Post 1354168)
I have a feeling your mood will change as the full productivity the company won (ie you are away from your family not by choice) is put into action over the coming months. Giving up work rules that decrease quality of life. DUMB DUMB DUMB! You will see. I have lived through this before and it's not fun.
|
Originally Posted by SailorJerry
(Post 1354169)
I'd heard so much good about constructive engagement when I stepped foot through the door here that I assumed that ALPA could do no wrong. By the end of my newhire pizza and beer fest I was angry enough to say something to the newhire guy. ALPA, as you pointed out earlier, was in fact the guiding force of the pilots - not the other way around, as it should be. It was clear, and remains clear over 2 years later that all committees are operating and dictating opinion TO the pilots while intentionally withholding facts. I never went into defend ALPA mode about the PNCL thing. (Mr Johnso on the other hand...) but I was at least put at ease after I reached out to my rep and got the facts. It's been years since anyone said "well the pilots think..." to management here. That's wrong.
I always tried to make sure constituent pilots have all the facts. We lead busy, complicated lives as pilots, and there's enough information flowing out there that we could literally be overwhelmed by it. I'm thankful that some guys are crazy enough to try to wrestle with it all, but I'd appreciate a bigger picture view, and I'd appreciate more reps flying the line, rather than being part time office jockeys. Been there, tried that - you lose touch after about 10 days away from the line. Bottom line, ALPA lost the right to make up my mind for me after 10 days on the property. If I support them, even over something contentious, it's because unity is the prevailing winning condition. I assure you though, my own opinion and my own perspective is my own, typically derived from my own facts. If that's optimistic, then I guess that's a good thing. We're moving in the right direction, but I was certainly hoping for a larger shift in direction and tact from ALPA with a new poodle...err...MEC Chairman in place. When did I ever defend the 9E Bridge Agreement? :confused: |
Originally Posted by johnso29
(Post 1354188)
I came from a regional. I'll take our current work rules over that anyday. My last 10 days in my previous life, I was JRA'd twice. No recourse. It was on my Release. Once at Delta, someone called and said I was the junior available, and asked if I'd be interested in working on days off for premium pay and some more days off. Couldn't make it in time, but it was nice of them to ask. |
Originally Posted by johnso29
(Post 1354190)
When did I ever defend the 9E Bridge Agreement? :confused: |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 09:17 PM. |
|
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands