![]() |
|
Originally Posted by Check Essential
(Post 1353434)
Whoa there. I like dissenting opinions. Even when stated inartfully and sometimes offensively.
It'd be pretty boring around here if all we had were pro-ALPA pro-company sailingfun types. I be wearin' my Drank t-shirt. We need that boy all up in here. Fo shizzle. http://rlv.zcache.com/gimme_some_pur...30trlf_400.jpg |
Someone had a good synopsis of what was going on from In Command. The company isn't pleased with ALK's shenanigans, and we are starting to add our own feed to SEA. Also want to add more long range flying out of SEA to Asia, overflying NRT. HA doesn't fit into our plans, either, as they have a lot of debt and don't own many of their airplanes.
|
Originally Posted by sailingfun
(Post 1353371)
The shortcall max only goes up in a month where reserves are paid 75 hours or more. That works out to about half the year so short calls will increase on average to 6.5 max. The average overall shortcall utilization by the company runs around 2.8 per month.
You know my eyes typically focus straight on what is posted and then after reading will gravitate to who wrote what. Now this one was relatively tame, but it had that "defend the company at all costs" tinge to it since that 2.8 number seemed low compared to what my experience has been since last spring, so when my eyes drifted over to who its author was I had a sneaking suspicion I was on the money with one of my two picks. :D |
Originally Posted by GunshipGuy
(Post 1353457)
You know my eyes typically focus straight on what is posted and then after reading will gravitate to who wrote what. Now this one was relatively tame, but it had that "defend the company at all costs" tinge to it since that 2.8 number seemed low compared to what my experience has been since last spring, so when my eyes drifted over to who its author was I had a sneaking suspicion I was on the money with one of my two picks. :D Did you think it was gonna be me? |
2.8 a month seems pretty low to me, especially for the NYC 7ER A category.
|
Originally Posted by Purple Drank
(Post 1353388)
Yes, I think that will change. I doubt if the company negotiated for something they didn't intend to use.
Just one more way for the company to absorb impending retirements without replacing them 1 for 1. But we did get 4-8-3-3, so it's ok.
Originally Posted by Imapilot2
(Post 1353390)
Just curious, did you come from NWA? If so I understand but if not why did you apply to a company that you constantly berate? Everything out of your mouth 100% of the time is negative, condescending, anit-ALPA or anti-Delta. Why did you interview or even apply? Why stay?
I thought Delta was the end all be all, and was over joyed to get hired on. I still think it's the best place for me--great people, great leadership. But now that I've been here a while I do question some of the moves made and how DALPA doesn't always seem to put up much of a fight like I think they should. So one has to wonder why that is. That doesn't mean I appreciate the work they do and how hard they fight for the line pilot, but am I totally satisfied--no. At times I'm very disappointed. I didn't have an opportunity to see the reasons why I would think this when I applied and was hired. And as I said before I still feel with these negatives that Delta is the best place to be. So hopefully this perspective helps you understand why some of us agree with the opinions of folks like Purple D. |
Really if they're gonna put out planning documents calling for 2 or 3 a day, then assigning 5, even to guys with 1 day of availability, they should really just not put out the planning document. I understand calling everyone in to a bad weather day, but when it's 000/00 10SM CLR in NYC or ATL, then assigning 5 and using 0 is insulting.
|
Originally Posted by dalad
(Post 1353443)
Someone had a good synopsis of what was going on from In Command. The company isn't pleased with ALK's shenanigans, and we are starting to add our own feed to SEA. Also want to add more long range flying out of SEA to Asia, overflying NRT. HA doesn't fit into our plans, either, as they have a lot of debt and don't own many of their airplanes.
Dalad, someone must have spiked your drink. Talk like that sounds like organic growth could be around the corner. Crazy talk. :D |
Originally Posted by Purple Drank
(Post 1353395)
Most of us don't realize that ALPA doesn't give a tinker's damn about the Delta pilot. They care only about the Delta pilot's dues money, and how they can keep it. They're trying to preserve their empire any way they can.
|
Originally Posted by sailingfun
(Post 1353372)
You will get virtually nothing. The pilots bidding on the 400 seem to stay there. If they are not bidding off in less then 2 years then the cost savings to the company is zero. The copilots bidding off almost always seem to be going to Captain seats. No freeze at all there.
Its going to be a far different story on the 717. |
| All times are GMT -8. The time now is 01:35 PM. |
|
Website Copyright © 2026 MH Sub I, LLC dba Internet Brands